Re: [Gluster-devel] relative ordering of writes to same file from two different fds

2016-09-21 Thread Ric Wheeler
On 09/21/2016 08:58 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: However, my understanding is that filesystems need not maintain the relative order of writes (as it received from vfs/kernel) on two different fds. Also, if we have to maintain the order it might come with increased latency. The increased latency can be

Re: [Gluster-devel] relative ordering of writes to same file from two different fds

2016-09-21 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
- Original Message - > From: "Ric Wheeler" > To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" , "Gluster Devel" > > Cc: "ryan ding" > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 6:32:29 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel]

Re: [Gluster-devel] relative ordering of writes to same file from two different fds

2016-09-21 Thread Jeff Darcy
> However, my understanding is that filesystems need not maintain the relative > order of writes (as it received from vfs/kernel) on two different fds. Also, > if we have to maintain the order it might come with increased latency. The > increased latency can be because of having "newer" writes to

Re: [Gluster-devel] relative ordering of writes to same file from two different fds

2016-09-21 Thread Raghavendra Talur
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: > On 09/21/2016 08:06 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> This mail is to figure out the behavior of write to same file from two >> different fds. As Ryan quotes in one of comments, >> >> >> >> I think it’s

Re: [Gluster-devel] Introducing Tendrl

2016-09-21 Thread Dan Mick
On 09/20/2016 11:38 AM, Ric Wheeler wrote: > My assumption is that they might want to use these modules (from tendryl > down to the ceph/gluster bits) to add support for ceph and gluster. Is it Tendrl or Tendryl? (or the actual word, which would be 'tendril' and thus unambiguous and memorable)?

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] centos-5 build failures on mainline

2016-09-21 Thread Kaushal M
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:53:43AM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> >> >> As of now we don't check for build sanity on RHEL5/centos-5 distros. >> I believe Gluster still

[Gluster-devel] Weekly Community Meeting - 21-Sep-2016

2016-09-21 Thread Kaushal M
This weeks meeting started slow. But snowballed into quite an active meeting. Thank you all who attended the meeting! The meeting logs for the meeting are available at the links below, and the minutes have been pasted at the end. - Minutes:

Re: [Gluster-devel] relative ordering of writes to same file from two different fds

2016-09-21 Thread Ric Wheeler
On 09/21/2016 08:06 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: Hi all, This mail is to figure out the behavior of write to same file from two different fds. As Ryan quotes in one of comments, I think it’s not safe. in this case: 1. P1 write to F1 use FD1 2. after P1 write finish, P2 write to the same

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] centos-5 build failures on mainline

2016-09-21 Thread Niels de Vos
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:53:43AM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > As of now we don't check for build sanity on RHEL5/centos-5 distros. > I believe Gluster still has legacy support for these distros. Here we could > either add a

Re: [Gluster-devel] review request - Change the way client uuid is built

2016-09-21 Thread Niels de Vos
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:47:34AM -0400, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > Hi all, > > [1] might have implications across different components in the stack. Your > reviews are requested. > > > > rpc : Change the way client uuid is built > > Problem: > Today the main users of client uuid are

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] centos-5 build failures on mainline

2016-09-21 Thread Nigel Babu
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:53:43AM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > As of now we don't check for build sanity on RHEL5/centos-5 distros. > I believe Gluster still has legacy support for these distros. Here we could > either add a

[Gluster-devel] Removing strfmt job on Centos CI

2016-09-21 Thread Nigel Babu
Hello, I'm going to remove the strfmt job on Centos CI. We have it working as a pre-commit job now. Running it on Centos CI seems redundant now. -- nigelb ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org

[Gluster-devel] centos-5 build failures on mainline

2016-09-21 Thread Atin Mukherjee
As of now we don't check for build sanity on RHEL5/centos-5 distros. I believe Gluster still has legacy support for these distros. Here we could either add a glusterfs-devrpms script for el5 for every patch submission or at worst have a