[Gluster-devel] automating straightforward backports

hi, Nowadays I am seeing quite a few patches are straightforward backports from master. But if I follow the process it generally takes around 10 minutes to complete porting each patch. I was wondering if anyone else looked into automating this. Yesterday I had to backport

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Gluster Test Thursday - Release 3.9

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 01:11:26PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 10/25/2016 12:11 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 07:51:47AM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > >> On 10/25/2016 06:46 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Aravinda

Re: [Gluster-devel] Multiplexing status, October 26

Here are some of the numbers. Note that these are *without* multiplexing, which is where these changes are really most beneficial, because I wanted to measure the effect of this patch on its own. Also, perf-test.sh is a truly awful test. For one thing it's entirely single-threaded, which

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Test Thursday - Release 3.9

Gluster 3.9.0rc2 tarball is available here http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.9.0rc2.tar.gz regards Aravinda On Tuesday 25 October 2016 04:12 PM, Aravinda wrote: Hi, Since Automated test framework for Gluster is in progress, we need help from Maintainers and

[Gluster-devel] Memory management and friends

Hello. As a result of today's community meeting I start dedicated ML thread for gathering memory management issues together to make it possible to summarize them and construct some plan what to do next. Very important notice: I'm not the active GlusterFS developer, but gained excessive

[Gluster-devel] Weekly community meeting - 26-Oct-2016

Hi all! This weeks meeting was GD. We got rid of the regular updates, and just had an open floor. This had the intended effect of more conversations. We discussed 3 main topics today, - How do we recognize contributors and their contributions [manikandan] - What's happening with memory

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regarding merge window for the approaching GlusterFS-3.7.17 release

Hi all, Please be reminded that changes need to be merged into release-3.7 for GlusterFS-3,7.17 by today. Regards, Samikshan On 10/24/2016 05:32 PM, Samikshan Bairagya wrote: Hi all, GlusterFS-3.7.17 is on target to be released on October 30th (Sunday). In preparation for the release,

Re: [Gluster-devel] Input/output error when files in .shard folder are deleted

Do you also have the brick logs? Looks like the bricks are returning EINVAL on lookup which AFR is subsequently converting into an EIO. And sharding is merely delivering the same error code upwards. -Krutika On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:38 AM, qingwei wei wrote: > Hi, > > Pls

[Gluster-devel] NFS-Ganesha last week update

Brief update on progress we made on NFS-Ganesha In last week NFS-Ganesha with FSAL_GLUSTER was tested in Bakeathon- Boston 2016 and found issues in ACL, solaris client and pNFS. There were four different test environment used with default configuration, kerberos configured, ACLs enabled

[Gluster-devel] Multiplexing status, October 26

Ahead of the community meeting (barely), here's where things are. I've been in meetings all week, so progress has been a bit slower than usual. When I've been able to do direct work at all, it has mostly been on testing and mostly for the prerequisite io-threads patch

Re: [Gluster-devel] mechanism to match volume identity

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Saravanakumar Arumugam wrote: > > > On 10/26/2016 03:58 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: >> >> HI, >> >> Is there any method to determine if volume "myvol" accessible through >> volfile server "server1" is same as volume "myvol" accessible through

Re: [Gluster-devel] mechanism to match volume identity

On 10/26/2016 03:58 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: HI, Is there any method to determine if volume "myvol" accessible through volfile server "server1" is same as volume "myvol" accessible through volfile server "server2"? This is easy with trusted storage pool access, one has to determine if

Re: [Gluster-devel] quota-rename.t core in netbsd

Vijay Bellur wrote: > Emmanuel might be able to help with problems related to NetBSD > environment. Sure, feel free to ask if you hit NetBSD-speciic troubles. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz m...@netbsd.org ___

[Gluster-devel] Progress about small files performance

Any progress about the major issue with gluster: the small files performance? Anyone working on this? I would really like to use gluster as storage for maildirs or web hosting, but with the current performance this wouldn't be possible without adding additional layers (like exporting huge files

[Gluster-devel] Week in GlusterD-2.0

This week in GD2, - We now have a Docker image and Vagrantfile for easier testing of GD2. - The Dockerfiles and Vagrantfiles are available under `/extras/dev-docker`[1] and `/extras/test-env`[2] in the GD2 repository. - Docker images for testing will be automatically built for every GD2