[Gluster-devel] questions about 'SYNCOP'

Hi all, I'm trying to understand syncop_* and others. but I don't understand at all. 1. what is the purpose of syncop_*? I found when glusterfs is executed, two of syncenv_processor thread is created. but when doing fio benchmark it works nothing. 2. I think '#define SYNCOP(subvol, stb, ...) is

Re: [Gluster-devel] release-3.10: Final call for release notes updates

Thanks Xavi, Looks good. Niels/Poornima, I would like to improve the release note on "Statedump support for gfapi based applications", it currently reads very poorly about the feature (I wrote it for RC0, so I know it is poor). Request one or both, of you to help with the same. Either

Re: [Gluster-devel] IMP: Release 3.10: RC1 Pending bugs (Need fixes by 21st Feb)

On 02/20/2017 11:29 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri > wrote: On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Shyam > wrote: Hi,

Re: [Gluster-devel] IMP: Release 3.10: RC1 Pending bugs (Need fixes by 21st Feb)

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Shyam wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> RC1 tagging is *tentatively* scheduled for 21st Feb, 2017 >> >> The intention is that RC1 becomes the release, hence we

Re: [Gluster-devel] IMP: Release 3.10: RC1 Pending bugs (Need fixes by 21st Feb)

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Shyam wrote: > Hi, > > RC1 tagging is *tentatively* scheduled for 21st Feb, 2017 > > The intention is that RC1 becomes the release, hence we would like to > chase down all blocker bugs [1] and get them fixed before RC1 is tagged. > > This

Re: [Gluster-devel] C99 requirement in Gluster ?

Le lundi 20 février 2017 à 06:33 -0500, Kaleb Keithley a écrit : > > - Original Message - > > From: "Michael Scherer" > > > > so I was reading coverty scan reports (as Nigel tricked me into looking > > them), and one of the first is this: > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] IMP: Release 3.10: RC1 Pending bugs (Need fixes by 21st Feb)

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 09:55:41PM -0500, Shyam wrote: > Hi, > > RC1 tagging is *tentatively* scheduled for 21st Feb, 2017 > > The intention is that RC1 becomes the release, hence we would like to chase > down all blocker bugs [1] and get them fixed before RC1 is tagged. > > This mail requests

Re: [Gluster-devel] C99 requirement in Gluster ?

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 06:33:24AM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Michael Scherer" > > > > so I was reading coverty scan reports (as Nigel tricked me into looking > > them), and one of the first is this: > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] C99 requirement in Gluster ?

- Original Message - > From: "Michael Scherer" > > so I was reading coverty scan reports (as Nigel tricked me into looking > them), and one of the first is this: >

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-1303028-Rebalance-glusterd-rpc-connection-issue.t failure

Hi Atin, will take a look. - Original Message - > From: "Atin Mukherjee" > To: "Hari Gowtham" > Cc: "Gluster Devel" > Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 2:29:38 PM > Subject: >

[Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-1303028-Rebalance-glusterd-rpc-connection-issue.t failure

Has failed earlier as well. -- ~ Atin (atinm) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] release-3.10: Final call for release notes updates

Hi Shyam, I've added some comments [1] for the issue between disperse's dynamic code generator and SELinux. It assumes that [2] will be backported to 3.10. Xavi [1] https://review.gluster.org/16685 [2] https://review.gluster.org/16614 On 20/02/17 04:04, Shyam wrote: Hi, Please find the

Re: [Gluster-devel] https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16643/

Hi Nithya, I've merged it. However Vijay said in another email [1] that backports to 3.9 are not needed anymore. Xavi [1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2017-February/052107.html On 20/02/17 09:19, Nithya Balachandran wrote: Hi, Can this be merged ? This is holding up

[Gluster-devel] https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16643/

Hi, Can this be merged ? This is holding up my 3.9 patch backports. Regards, Nithya ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel