Glusterfs 3.10.3 has been tagged.
Packages for the various distributions will be available in a few days,
and with that a more formal release announcement will be made.
- Tagged code: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/tree/v3.10.3
- Release notes:
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 04:08:06PM +0530, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote:
> We are using 3.7.6 and on link https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16279 status
> is "can't merge"
Note that 3.7.x will not get any updates anymore. We currently maintain
version 3.8.x, 3.10.x and 3.11.x. See the release schedele for
GlusterFS Coverity covscan results are available from
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/master/glusterfs-coverity/2017-05-31-57b0a4a3
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
So is there any one working on it to fix this issue either by this patch or
some other way? if yes then please provide the time plan.
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Amar Tumballi wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:08 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL >
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:08 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL
wrote:
> We are using 3.7.6 and on link https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16279
> status is "can't merge"
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Amar Tumballi
> wrote:
>
>> This is already part of 3.11.0
We are using 3.7.6 and on link https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16279 status
is "can't merge"
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Amar Tumballi wrote:
> This is already part of 3.11.0 release?
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:47 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL >
hi,
I just read the pdf linked in the patch https://review.gluster.org/16832
and learned something I didn't know before about how to use conditional
variables efficiently. Just wanted to share it here in case it is useful
for others too. Do go through the patch as well to see how the idea is
This is already part of 3.11.0 release?
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:47 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL
wrote:
> Hi Atin,
>
> Could you please let us know any time plan for deliver of this patch.
>
> Regards,
> Abhishek
>
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 6:37 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL
Hi Atin,
Could you please let us know any time plan for deliver of this patch.
Regards,
Abhishek
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 6:37 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL
wrote:
> Actually it is very risky if it will reproduce in production thats is why
> I said it is on high priority as want
I just realised there was already some effort in 2010 to have per-xl
latency measurement.
See commit d90c2f86ca7a8f6660e98da1e48c4798539b7d51.
Turns out you need to send SIGUSR2 to the process to enable it.
And the stats are collected through statedump.
Haven't yet tested it. Will try and get
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Shyam wrote:
> On 05/30/2017 05:28 AM, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
>
>> You're right. With brick graphs, this will be a problem.
>>
>> Couple of options:
>>
>> 1. To begin with we identify points where we think it would be useful to
>> load
11 matches
Mail list logo