Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

2017-09-11 Thread Raghavendra G
Update. Two more days to go for the deadline. Till now, there are no open issues identified against this patch. On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "FNU Raghavendra Manjunath" > > To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" > > Cc: "Raghavend

[Gluster-devel] Release 3.13: (STM release) Details

2017-09-11 Thread Shyam Ranganathan
Hi, The next community release of Gluster is 3.13, which is a short term maintenance release is slated for release on 30th Nov [1] [2]. Thus giving a 2 month head room to get to 4.0 work done, while maintaining the cadence of releasing every 3 months. This mail is to announce the scope, sche

Re: [Gluster-devel] netbsd-periodic failing on master

2017-09-11 Thread Nigel Babu
Woops, Atin just pointed out that this was a link to the centos regression with multiplex, not netbsd. Here's a link to the NetBSD job: https://build.gluster.org/job/netbsd-periodic/ On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Hari Gowtham wrote

Re: [Gluster-devel] netbsd-periodic failing on master

2017-09-11 Thread Atin Mukherjee
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Hari Gowtham wrote: > Hi, > > I took a look at the issue. The new command "gluster volume status > client-list" > Has an issue with brick multiplexing. > > The way this command aggregates the values and the way the brick > multiplexing aggreagates are > messing u

[Gluster-devel] Coverity covscan for 2017-09-11-ecc5b302 (master branch)

2017-09-11 Thread staticanalysis
GlusterFS Coverity covscan results are available from http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/master/glusterfs-coverity/2017-09-11-ecc5b302 ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman

Re: [Gluster-devel] netbsd-periodic failing on master

2017-09-11 Thread Hari Gowtham
Hi, I took a look at the issue. The new command "gluster volume status client-list" Has an issue with brick multiplexing. The way this command aggregates the values and the way the brick multiplexing aggreagates are messing up the command output and its broken. I'm taking a look at it. will sen