[Gluster-devel] Feature proposal: xlator to optimize heal and rebalance operations

Hi all, I've created a new GitHub issue [1] to discuss an idea to optimize self-heal and rebalance operations by not requiring to take a lock during data operations. Any thoughts will be welcome. Regards, Xavi [1] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/347

[Gluster-devel] RIO scope in release 4.0 (Was: Request for Comments: Upgrades from 3.x to 4.0+)

On 11/02/2017 08:10 AM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar wrote: Hi Amudhan, Please go through the following that would clarify up-gradation concerns from DHT to RIO in 4.0 1. RIO would not deprecate DHT. Both DHT and RIO would co-exist. 2. DHT volumes would not be migrated to RIO. DHT volumes

[Gluster-devel] Unplanned Gerrit Outage yesterday

Hello folks, Yesterday, we had an unplanned Gerrit outage. We have now determined that for some reason the machine rebooted for some reason. Michael is continuing to debug what lead to this issue. Gerrit does not start automatically when the VM restarted at this point. We are currently testing a

Re: [Gluster-devel] String manipulation

Missed to click "reply all" earlier :) On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Xavi Hernandez wrote: > Hi Atin, > > On 2 November 2017 at 16:31, Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Xavi Hernandez >>

[Gluster-devel] Coverity fixes

While I appreciate the folks to contribute lot of coverity fixes over last few days, I have an observation for some of the patches the coverity issue id(s) are *not* mentioned which gets maintainers in a difficult situation to understand the exact complaint coming out of the coverity. From my past

[Gluster-devel] tendrl-release v1.5.4 is available

Hello, The Tendrl team is happy to present tendrl-release v1.5.4 Install docs: https://github.com/Tendrl/documentation/wiki/Tendrl-release-v1.5.4-(install-guide) Metrics: https://github.com/Tendrl/documentation/wiki/Metrics ___ Gluster-devel mailing

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Request for Comments: Upgrades from 3.x to 4.0+

does RIO improves folder listing and rebalance, when compared to 3.x? if yes, do you have any performance data comparing RIO and DHT? On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Kaushal M wrote: > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Amudhan P wrote: > > if doing an

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Request for Comments: Upgrades from 3.x to 4.0+

if doing an upgrade from 3.10.1 to 4.0 or 4.1, will I be able to access volume without any challenge? I am asking this because 4.0 comes with DHT2? On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Kaushal M wrote: > We're fast approaching the time for Gluster-4.0. And we would like to >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] BoF - Gluster for VM store use case

Yes, I would be interested to hear more on the findings. Let us know once you have them. On Nov 1, 2017 13:10, "Shyam Ranganathan" wrote: > On 10/31/2017 08:36 PM, Ben Turner wrote: > >> * Erasure coded volumes with sharding - seen as a good fit for VM disk >>> storage >>>

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Request for Comments: Upgrades from 3.x to 4.0+

Hi Amudhan, Please go through the following that would clarify up-gradation concerns from DHT to RIO in 4.0 1. RIO would not deprecate DHT. Both DHT and RIO would co-exist. 2. DHT volumes would not be migrated to RIO. DHT volumes would still be using DHT code. 3. The new volume

[Gluster-devel] glusters 3.12.2: bricks do not start on NetBSD

Hello I have been missing updates for a while. Now I try to upgrade from 3.8.9 to 3.12.2 and I hit a regression: brick processes start, but gluster volume status show them as not started. A relevant line in the brick process log is: [2017-11-02 12:32:56.867606] E [MSGID: 115092]

[Gluster-devel] Coverity covscan for 2017-11-02-84f4f68b (master branch)

GlusterFS Coverity covscan results are available from http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/master/glusterfs-coverity/2017-11-02-84f4f68b ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Request for Comments: Upgrades from 3.x to 4.0+

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Amudhan P wrote: > if doing an upgrade from 3.10.1 to 4.0 or 4.1, will I be able to access > volume without any challenge? > > I am asking this because 4.0 comes with DHT2? > > Thanks for bringing this up. We did hear such concerns earlier

[Gluster-devel] String manipulation

Hi all, Several times I've seen issues with the way strings are handled in many parts of the code. Sometimes it's because of an incorrect use of some functions, like strncat(). Others it's because of a lack of error conditions check. Others it's a failure in allocating the right amount of memory,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Request for Comments: Upgrades from 3.x to 4.0+

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Amudhan P wrote: > if doing an upgrade from 3.10.1 to 4.0 or 4.1, will I be able to access > volume without any challenge? > > I am asking this because 4.0 comes with DHT2? Very short answer, yes. Your volumes will remain the same. And you

[Gluster-devel] Request for Comments: Upgrades from 3.x to 4.0+

We're fast approaching the time for Gluster-4.0. And we would like to set out the expected upgrade strategy and try to polish it to be as user friendly as possible. We're getting this out here now, because there was quite a bit of concern and confusion regarding the upgrades between 3.x and 4.0+.

[Gluster-devel] Maintainers' meeting: Minutes (11/01/2017 - Nov 1st, 2017)

Links - Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/205933580 - Download: https://bluejeans.com/s/9vElE Attendance - [Sorry Note] Jose, Atin (Holiday in India) - jdarcy, shyam, amarts, amye, nigelb, michael