On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 5:38 PM Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
wrote:
> On 9/26/18 8:28 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > With the introduction of default python 3 shebangs and the change in
> > configure.ac to correct these to py2 if the build is being attempted on
> > a machine that does not
On 9/27/18 8:57 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 9/27/18 8:40 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>> On 09/27/2018 08:07 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
The thought is,
- Add a configure option "--enable-py-version-correction" to configure,
that is disabled by default
>>> "correction"
On 9/27/18 8:40 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> On 09/27/2018 08:07 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>>> The thought is,
>>> - Add a configure option "--enable-py-version-correction" to configure,
>>> that is disabled by default
>> "correction" implies there's something that's incorrect. How about
>>
On 09/27/2018 08:07 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>> The thought is,
>> - Add a configure option "--enable-py-version-correction" to configure,
>> that is disabled by default
> "correction" implies there's something that's incorrect. How about
> "conversion" or perhaps just --enable-python2
>
I
On 9/26/18 8:28 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the introduction of default python 3 shebangs and the change in
> configure.ac to correct these to py2 if the build is being attempted on
> a machine that does not have py3, there are a couple of issues
> uncovered. Here is the plan to
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 02:28:32PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:04 PM Sahina Bose wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > gluster-gnfs rpms are missing in 4.0/4.1 repos in CentOS storage. Is this
> > intended?
> >
>
> Rephrasing my question - is there plans to push gluster-gnfs
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:04 PM Sahina Bose wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> gluster-gnfs rpms are missing in 4.0/4.1 repos in CentOS storage. Is this
> intended?
>
Rephrasing my question - is there plans to push gluster-gnfs rpms to the
CentOS repos as well?
> thanks
> sahina
>
