[Gluster-devel] Regards glusterd.service is not started automatically after reboot the node

Hi, We are facing an issue after install glusterfs-6 rpms. After reboot, the node glusterd.service is not started automatically because glusterd.service is not enabled by the installation script.I am not able to find the patch from that we deleted command to enable service from glusterfs.s

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 6.1: Expected tagging on April 10th

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:53 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan < atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > My take is, lets disable sdfs for 6.1 (we also have issues with its > performance anyways). We will fix it properly by 6.2 or 7.0. Continue with > marking sdfs-sanity.t tests as bad in that case. > It is be

[Gluster-devel] glusterfsd memory leak issue found after enable ssl

Hi, In my recent test, I found that there are very severe glusterfsd memory leak when enable socket ssl option. If I monitor glusterfsd process RSS with command: pidstat -r -p 1 And at the same tme, execute command: gluster v heal info, i find that the RSS keep increasing until system Out of m

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 6.1: Expected tagging on April 10th

My take is, lets disable sdfs for 6.1 (we also have issues with its performance anyways). We will fix it properly by 6.2 or 7.0. Continue with marking sdfs-sanity.t tests as bad in that case. -Amar On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:04 AM Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:33 AM Pran

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 6.1: Expected tagging on April 10th

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:33 AM Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:27 PM Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 9:19 PM Atin Mukherjee >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:24 PM Shyam Ranganathan >>> wrote: >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 6.1: Expected tagging on April 10th

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:27 PM Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 9:19 PM Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:24 PM Shyam Ranganathan >> wrote: >> >>> Status: Tagging pending >>> >>> Waiting on patches: >>> (Kotresh/Atin) - glusterd: fix loading ctime

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 6.1: Expected tagging on April 10th

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:27 PM Atin Mukherjee wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 9:19 PM Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:24 PM Shyam Ranganathan >> wrote: >>> >>> Status: Tagging pending >>> >>> Waiting on patches: >>> (Kotresh/Atin) - glusterd: fix loading ctime in client gr

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 6.1: Expected tagging on April 10th

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:26 PM Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 9:19 PM Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:24 PM Shyam Ranganathan >> wrote: >> >>> Status: Tagging pending >>> >>> Waiting on patches: >>> (Kotresh/Atin) - glusterd: fix loading ctime

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 6.1: Expected tagging on April 10th

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 9:19 PM Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:24 PM Shyam Ranganathan > wrote: > >> Status: Tagging pending >> >> Waiting on patches: >> (Kotresh/Atin) - glusterd: fix loading ctime in client graph logic >> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22579

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 6.1: Expected tagging on April 10th

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:24 PM Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Status: Tagging pending > > Waiting on patches: > (Kotresh/Atin) - glusterd: fix loading ctime in client graph logic > https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22579 The regression doesn't pass for the mainline patch. I believe master

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 6.1: Expected tagging on April 10th

Status: Tagging pending Waiting on patches: (Kotresh/Atin) - glusterd: fix loading ctime in client graph logic https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22579 Following patches will not be taken in if CentOS regression does not pass by tomorrow morning Eastern TZ, (Pranith/KingLongMee) - cluster