[Gluster-devel] Gluster Build System not updating the Verified tag

Hi, Due to the issues with the regression machines the Gluster Build System had posted -1 to the verified tag of http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14619/ previously this week. Now all the regression tests and the build are successful, even then it is not updating the verified tag for the patch. It

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Build System not updating the Verified tag

- Original Message - > From: "Nigel Babu" <nig...@redhat.com> > To: "Karthik Subrahmanya" <ksubr...@redhat.com> > Cc: "Niels de Vos" <nde...@redhat.com>, "Jeff Darcy" <jda...@redhat.com>, > "Gluster Devel&

[Gluster-devel] Smoke Test not running

Hi, The smoke tests are not running. Can someone have a look? [2] has blocked all the other tests from long time. [1]https://build.gluster.org/job/netbsd6-smoke/ [2]https://build.gluster.org/job/netbsd6-smoke/14076/changes#detail0 Thanks & Regards, Karthik

[Gluster-devel] WORM/Retention Feature - 03/06/2016

# Thanks & Regards, Karthik Subrahmanya ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Gluster-devel] WORM/Retention Feature - 27/05/2016

://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1339524 Blog: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YSTDsbA93--AIU_myjqKkK2qTput0i0jOG2VMw_7mjc/edit?ts=5739915e# Thanks & Regards, Karthik Subrahmanya ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster

Re: [Gluster-devel] Change in glusterfs[master]: features/worm: updating function names & unwinding FOPs with...

Hi Jeff, Thank you for your time and the valuable reviews. I have addressed the review comments. Can you please have a look. Thanks & Regards, Karthik - Original Message - > From: "Jeff Darcy (Code Review)" > To: "Karthik U S" > Cc:

[Gluster-devel] WORM/Retention Feature - 24/06/2016

Hi all, This week's status: -Updated the blog -Working on implementation of automatic state transition with WRITE FOP -While trying to set the utimes with write FOP, getting "posix_do_futimes not implemented" error -Looking into the posix code to implement the "posix_do_futimes" function Plan

[Gluster-devel] WORM/Retention Feature - 17/06/2016

Hi all, This week's status: -Tested the feature -Working on state automatic state transition with write FOP Plan for next week: -Completing the state transition with write FOP -Working on performance improvement part of the feature Current work: Patch: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13429/

[Gluster-devel] WORM/Retention Feature - 26/02/2016

Your valuable suggestions, wish lists, and reviews are most welcome. Regards, Karthik Subrahmanya ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] WORM/Retention Feature: 07-04-2016

- Original Message - > From: "Niels de Vos" <nde...@redhat.com> > To: "Karthik Subrahmanya" <ksubr...@redhat.com> > Cc: "gluster-devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org> > Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 2:00:57 PM > Subject: Re:

[Gluster-devel] WORM/Retention Feature - 24/03/2016

work: POC: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13429/ Spec: http://review.gluster.org/13538 Feature page: http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Features/gluster_compliance_archive Your valuable suggestions, reviews, and wish lists are most welcome Thanks & Regards, Kar

[Gluster-devel] WORM/Retention Feature - 04/03/2016

ster_compliance_archive Your valuable reviews and suggestions are most welcome Thanks & Regards, Karthik Subrahmanya ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Gluster-devel] Requesting for help with gluster test framework

plan found in TAP output Files=1, Tests=0, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr + 0.01 sys = 0.03 CPU) Result: FAIL It would be awesome if someone can guide me with this. Thanks & Regards, Karthik Subrahmanya ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gl

Re: [Gluster-devel] Requesting for help with gluster test framework

- Original Message - From: "Prasanna Kalever" <pkale...@redhat.com> To: "Karthik Subrahmanya" <ksubr...@redhat.com> Cc: "Joseph Fernandes" <josfe...@redhat.com>, "Raghavendra Talur" <rta...@redhat.com>, "Vijaikumar

[Gluster-devel] WORM/Retention Feature: 01-04-2016

://review.gluster.org/#/c/13429/ Spec: http://review.gluster.org/13538 Feature page: http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Features/gluster_compliance_archive Your valuable suggestions, reviews, and wish lists are most welcome Thanks & Regards, Karthik Subrahm

[Gluster-devel] WORM/Retention Feature - 22/04/2016

/community/documentation/index.php/Features/gluster_compliance_archive Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326308 Blog: http://uskarthik.blogspot.in/ Your valuable suggestions, reviews, and wish lists are most welcome Thanks & Regards, Karthik Subrahm

Re: [Gluster-devel] Requesting for NetBSD setup

- Original Message - > From: "Emmanuel Dreyfus" <m...@netbsd.org> > To: "Karthik Subrahmanya" <ksubr...@redhat.com> > Cc: "gluster-devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org>, gluster-in...@gluster.org > Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 12:3

Re: [Gluster-devel] ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-mount.t failing

- Original Message - > From: "Karthik Subrahmanya" <ksubr...@redhat.com> > To: "Atin Mukherjee" <amukh...@redhat.com> > Cc: "gluster-devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org> > Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2016 4:36:11 PM > Subject

Re: [Gluster-devel] ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-mount.t failing

- Original Message - > From: "Atin Mukherjee" <amukh...@redhat.com> > To: "Karthik Subrahmanya" <ksubr...@redhat.com>, "gluster-devel" > <gluster-devel@gluster.org> > Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2016 4:22:31 PM > Subject

[Gluster-devel] Requesting for NetBSD setup

://review.gluster.org/#/c/13429/ Thanks & Regards, Karthik Subrahmanya ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] [smoke failure] Permission denied error while install-pygluypPYTHON

> > http://review.gluster.org/14337 has been posted but still needs some > reviewing. > > Niels > Thanks! ~Karthik ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] [smoke failure] Permission denied error while install-pygluypPYTHON

Got the same issue while backporting to 3.8 branch. Can some one please have a look? https://build.gluster.org/job/smoke/27834/console Regards, Karthik - Original Message - > From: "Aravinda" > To: "Kaushal M" > Cc: "Gluster Devel"

[Gluster-devel] WORM/Retention Feature - 13/05/2016

Hi all, This week's status: -Fixed some review comments on the patch -Working on re-factoring some parts of the feature Plan for next week: -Completing the re-factoring of the feature Current work: Patch: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13429/ http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14222/

Re: [Gluster-devel] Worm translator not truly disabled by default?

- Original Message - > From: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhan...@redhat.com> > To: "Joseph Fernandes" <josfe...@redhat.com>, "Karthik Subrahmanya" > <ksubr...@redhat.com> > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluste

Re: [Gluster-devel] Worm translator not truly disabled by default?

Thanks Krutika, Atin, Joseph for the inputs. I will send out a patch with this issue fixed. Regards, Karthik - Original Message - > From: "Joseph Fernandes" <josfe...@redhat.com> > To: "Karthik Subrahmanya" <ksubr...@redhat.com>, "Kruti

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster 3.8 : File level WORM/Retention

t; else if (label == 2) > op_errno = ENOMEM > > Unwind here... > goto out; > > wind: > ret = 0; > Wind here... > > out: return ret; > > 3. Talur's comment : Most of the functions in worm-helper need to have > gf_worm prefix. > > 4. Caching the

[Gluster-devel] WORM/Retention Feature - 06/05/2016

Hi all, This week's status: -Feature got merged with 3.8 branch -Fixed the bug #14182 reported by Krutika Dhananjay -Fixed the review comments by Vijay on unwinding the FOPs and naming the functions by Raghavendra Talur bug

[Gluster-devel] Requesting for review

Hi, Could you please review this fix? http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14182/ Thanks, Karthik ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Gluster-devel] WORM/Retention Feature - 15/04/2016

/gluster_compliance_archive Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326308 Your valuable suggestions, reviews, and wish lists are most welcome Thanks & Regards, Karthik Subrahmanya ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster

Re: [Gluster-devel] Thank You!

- Original Message - > From: "Niels de Vos" <nde...@redhat.com> > To: "Karthik Subrahmanya" <ksubr...@redhat.com> > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org>, josephau...@gmail.com, > "vivek sb agarwal" &g

[Gluster-devel] Review request for http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14815/

Hi, I have added implementation for the posix_do_futimes function, which is not complete in the current implementation. I did the implementation by looking into the current implementation of posix_do_utimes function. Please review the patch and correct me if I am wrong anywhere. Bug:

Re: [Gluster-devel] Thank You!

- Original Message - > From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowd...@redhat.com> > To: "Karthik Subrahmanya" <ksubr...@redhat.com> > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org>, josephau...@gmail.com, > "vivek sb

[Gluster-devel] WORM/Retention Feature - 01/07/2016

Hi all, This week's status: -Implemented the posix_do_futimes function and sent the patch for review -Fixed the review comments on the patch -Working on writing a test script for the posix_do_futimes function Plan for next week: -Completing the test script Current work: Patches:

Re: [Gluster-devel] About WORM feature

2 (GPLv2), > in all cases as published by the Free Software Foundation. > > > 以上、よろしくお願いします > 李 丹（LI DAN） > Dept. III of Technology and DevelopmentNanjing Fujitsu Nanda Software > Tech. Co., Ltd.(FNST) No. 6 Wenzhu Road, Nanjing, 210012, China > T: +86-25-86630566-

Re: [Gluster-devel] About WORM feature

request. > > The version info is as following: > samba-vfs-glusterfs-4.4.4-14.el7_3.x86_64 > glusterfs-3.10.3.tar.gz > > Can you give me some suggestion? Thanks! > > Regards, > Li Dan > > > > > From: Karthik Subrahmanya [mailto:ksubr...@redhat.com]

Re: [Gluster-devel] About WORM feature

Hi, On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Li, Dan wrote: > Hi, all > > I cannot find the introduction of WORM feature in the latest version of > documents. > Does it means that this feature is not recommended anymore? > We recommend the feature, but unfortunately the

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/basic/afr/gfid-mismatch-resolution-with-fav-child-policy.t - regression failures

Hey Atin, I had a look at "tests/basic/afr/gfid-mismatch-resolution-with-fav-child-policy.t". The test case passes in my local system with latest master. I also tried cherry picking some of the patches which failed regression but it passed on my system. In the list

Re: [Gluster-devel] geo-rep regression because of node-uuid change

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Aravinda wrote: > I think following format can be easily adopted by all components > > UUIDs of a subvolume are seperated by space and subvolumes are separated > by comma > > For example, node1 and node2 are replica with U1 and U2 UUIDs

Re: [Gluster-devel] geo-rep regression because of node-uuid change

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Xavier Hernandez wrote: > That's ok. I'm currently unable to write a patch for this on ec. Sunil is working on this patch. ~Karthik > If no one can do it, I can try to do it in 6 - 7 hours... > > Xavi > > > On Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] after hard reboot, split-brain happened, but nothing showed in gluster voluem heal info command !

ide it > to your, Thanks! > Ok. > > > Best regards, > *Cynthia **（周琳）* > > MBB SM HETRAN SW3 MATRIX > > Storage > Mobile: +86 (0)18657188311 > > > > *From:* Karthik Subrahmanya [mailto:ksubr...@redhat.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, September 28, 2017

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] after hard reboot, split-brain happened, but nothing showed in gluster voluem heal info command !

Hi, To resolve the gfid split-brain you can follow the steps at [1]. Since we don't have the pending markers set on the files, it is not showing in the heal info. To debug this issue, need some more data from you. Could you provide these things? 1. volume info 2. mount log 3. brick logs 4. shd

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] after hard reboot, split-brain happened, but nothing showed in gluster voluem heal info command !

at. They have many new features, bug fixes & performance improvements. If you can try to reproduce the issue on that would be very helpful. Regards, Karthik > Best regards, > *Cynthia **（周琳）* > > MBB SM HETRAN SW3 MATRIX > > Storage > Mobile: +86 (0)18657188311 > &

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.13: (STM release) Details

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Shyam Ranganathan <srang...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/31/2017 08:11 AM, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > >> Hey Shyam, >> >> Can we also have the heal info summary feature [1], which is merged >> upstream [2]. >> I have

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

On Tue 31 Jul, 2018, 10:17 PM Atin Mukherjee, wrote: > I just went through the nightly regression report of brick mux runs and > here's what I can summarize. > > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:00 PM Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > > On Tue 31 Jul, 2018, 10:17 PM Atin Mukherjee, wrote: > >> I just went through the nightly regression report of brick mux runs and >> her

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:12 PM Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:00 PM Karthik Subrahmanya > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue 31 Jul, 2018, 10:17 PM Atin Mukherjee, >> wrote: >> >>> I just went through the nightly regress

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:07 PM Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:12 PM Karthik Subrahmanya > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:00 PM Karthik Subrahmanya >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Master branch lock down status

On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 2:28 PM Nigel Babu wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 2:00 PM Ravishankar N > wrote: > >> >> On 08/08/2018 05:07 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> > 5) Current test failures >> > We still have the following tests failing and some without any RCA or >> > attention, (If

[Gluster-devel] bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t failing

Hi, $subject is failing on centos regression for most of the patches with timeout error. 07:32:34 07:32:34 [07:33:05] Running tests in file ./tests/bugs/core/bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t 07:32:34 Timeout set is

Re: [Gluster-devel] bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t failing

he regression system RAM size OR > - Decrease the number of volumes in the test case. > > But what is strange is why the test passes sometimes for some patches. > There could be some bug/? in memory consumption. > > Regards, > Poornima > > > On Fri, Jul 6,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t failing

t; > We've created the issue [1] and will solve it sooner. > Great. Thanks for the update. > > Sorry for the inconvenience. > > [1] https://github.com/gluster/softserve/issues/40 > > Thanks, > Deepshikha Khandelwal > > On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Karthik Subrahm

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t failing

Thanks for the patch Xavi :) Regards, Karthik On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:45 PM Xavi Hernandez wrote: > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:14 AM Karthik Subrahmanya > wrote: > >> Hi Deepshikha, >> >> Are you looking into this failure? I can still see this happening for

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t failing

AM i.e. same as that of the Jenkins builder's sizing >> configurations. >> >> [1] https://github.com/gluster/softserve/issues/40 >> >> Thanks, >> Deepshikha Khandelwal >> >> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Karthik Subrahmanya >> wrote: >>

Re: [Gluster-devel] replace-brick commit force fails in multi node cluster

Hey Atin, This is happening because of bringing down the glusterd on the third node before doing the replcae brick. In replace brick we do a temporary mount to mark pending xattr on the source bricks saying that the brick being replaced is sink. But in this case, since one of the source brick's

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Replica 3 - how to replace failed node (peer)

Hi Strahil, Thank you for sharing your experience with reset-brick option. Since he is using the gluster version 3.7.6, we do not have the reset-brick [1] option implemented there. It is introduced in 3.9.0. He has to go with replace-brick with the force option if he wants to use the same path &

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Replica 3 - how to replace failed node (peer)

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:23 AM Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > Hi Strahil, > > Can you give us some more insights on > - the volume configuration you were using? > - why you wanted to replace your brick? > - which brick(s) you tried replacing? > - if you remember the co

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Replica 3 - how to replace failed node (peer)

it never let me down. > > Best Regards, > Strahil Nikolov > On Apr 11, 2019 07:34, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > Hi Strahil, > > Thank you for sharing your experience with reset-brick option. > Since he is using the gluster version 3.7.6, we do not have the > reset-b

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Replica 3 - how to replace failed node (peer)

ng my experience. > Highly appreciated. Regards, Karthik > > Best Regards, > Strahil Nikolov > > В четвъртък, 11 април 2019 г., 0:53:52 ч. Гринуич-4, Karthik Subrahmanya < > ksubr...@redhat.com> написа: > > > Hi Strahil, > > Can you give us some more insights o

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Replica 3 - how to replace failed node (peer)

odes? I am running really > old 3.7.6 but stable version. > > Thanks, > BR! > > Martin > > > On 10 Apr 2019, at 12:20, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > After you add the new disks and creating raid array, you can run the > following command to

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Replica 3 - how to replace failed node (peer)

Hi Martin, After you add the new disks and creating raid array, you can run the following command to replace the old brick with new one: - If you are going to use a different name to the new brick you can run gluster volume replace-brickcommit force - If you are planning to use the same

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression failure continues: 'tests/basic/afr/split-brain-favorite-child-policy.t`

Hi Amar, I found the issue, will be sending a patch in a while. Regards, Karthik On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:46 PM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan < atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > Fails with: > > *20:56:58* ok 132 [ 8/ 82] < 194> 'gluster --mode=script --wignore > volume heal

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression failure continues: 'tests/basic/afr/split-brain-favorite-child-policy.t`

Patch posted: https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/22850/ -Karthik On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:47 PM Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > Hi Amar, > > I found the issue, will be sending a patch in a while. > > Regards, > Karthik > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:46 PM Am

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] [External] Replica 3 - how to replace failed node (peer)

Hi Martin, The reset-brick command is introduced in 3.9.0 and not present in 3.7.6. You can try using the same replace-brick command with the force option even if you want to use the same name for the brick being replaced. 3.7.6 is EOLed long back and glusterfs-6 is the latest version with lots

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Code Metrics Weekly Report

Hi Saju, Seems like coverity builds are failing. According to the overview page "Last Analyzed" is pointing to 21st September. I have seen few of the issues being triaged/fixed but the count is still showing as 27 issues