Hi All,
As discussed in the last community meeting [1], we are considering
addition of sub-maintainers to GlusterFS. The intent of this activity is
to streamline our patch management and make it more scalable.
The responsibilities of sub-maintainers would include:
1. Overall patch
Hi All,
I am happy to announce that Niels de Vos will be the release maintainer
for release-3.5. Kaleb Keithley will continue to function as the release
maintainer for release-3.4. Please join me in congratulating Niels on
his new role and extend your co-operation to him for further 3.5.x
On 04/30/2014 09:28 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
We plan to perform update gerrit to provide access to sub-maintainers by
end of this week (i.e. 4th May). If you have any objections, concerns or
feedback on this process, please feel free to provide that before then
on this thread or to me in person
On 05/15/2014 07:57 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 06:05:00PM +0530, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 04/30/2014 07:03 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
Hi us,
Was trying out the GlusterFS regression tests in Rackspace VMs last
night for each of the release-3.4, release-3.5, and master branches
On 05/16/2014 08:59 AM, James wrote:
Hi,
When automatically building volumes, a volume create failed:
volume create: puppet: failed: Commit failed on
----. Please check log file for
details.
The funny thing was that 'gluster volume info' showed a normal looking
On 05/17/2014 02:10 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com
To: gluster-infra gluster-in...@gluster.org
Cc: gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 4:13:02 PM
Subject: [Gluster-devel] Changes to Regression script
Hi
On 05/19/2014 09:41 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com
To: Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com
Cc: gluster-infra gluster-in...@gluster.org, gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Saturday, 17 May, 2014 2:52:03 PM
Subject: Re
On 05/21/2014 08:50 PM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
KP, Atin and myself did some debugging and found that there was a
deadlock in glusterd.
When creating a volume snapshot, the back-end operation 'taking a
lvm_snapshot and starting brick' for the each brick
are executed in parallel using synctask
[Adding the right alias for gluster-devel this time around]
On 05/22/2014 05:29 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
Hi All,
Given the addition of new sub-maintainers release maintainers to the
community [1], I have felt the need to publish a set of guidelines for
all categories of maintainers to have
On 05/22/2014 02:10 AM, Alex Pyrgiotis wrote:
On 02/17/2014 06:22 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 02/17/2014 05:11 PM, Alex Pyrgiotis wrote:
On 02/10/2014 07:06 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 02/05/2014 04:10 PM, Alex Pyrgiotis wrote:
Hi all,
Just wondering, do we have any news on that?
Hi Alex
On 05/29/2014 06:04 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
The test-case in question uses the cluster framework, where the logs are
saved in /d/backends and is not present in the compressed log file. So i
wrote a patch http://review.gluster.org/#/c/7924/ which creates the
glusterd logs for the cluster
On 06/01/2014 04:13 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
It _may_ be related to the new regression test cleanup function
I'm working on:
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/7937/
(possibly cleaned up / removed too much stuff)
It also might not be, as it's only supposed to have run on the
slaves.
+ Justin
On 06/11/2014 10:45 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 06/11/2014 09:45 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 06/11/2014 08:21 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
I see that quota-anon-fd.t is causing too many spurious failures. I
think we should revert it and raise a bug so that it can
On 06/11/2014 11:18 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 06/11/2014 10:45 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 06/11/2014 09:45 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 06/11/2014 08:21 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
I see that quota-anon-fd.t is causing too many spurious failures. I
think
On 06/12/2014 01:35 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
Vijay,
Could you merge this patch please.
http://review.gluster.org/7928
Done, thanks.
-Vijay
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
On 06/13/2014 01:34 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
Would you have a sec to merge this?
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8057/
It's just passed regression testing, and is a fix for
the spurious failure of bug-830665.t, which is
happening a lot. :)
Done, thanks!
-Vijay
On 06/15/2014 04:42 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 06/15/2014 03:55 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 15/06/2014, at 3:36 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 06/13/2014 06:41 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
Hi Pranith,
Do you want me to keep sending you spurious regression failure
notification?
On 06/20/2014 08:13 PM, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
Hi,
I am seeing glupy.t test being failed in some testcases. It is failing
in my local machine as well (with latest master). Is it a genuine
failure or a spurious one?
/tests/features/glupy.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 6
Failed: 2)
Hi All,
I have pulled together some statistics from gerrit for fun. The
statistics that I have generated are limited by my understanding of
gerrit's gsql interface. I don't claim that these stats are 100%
accurate - if you notice any aberrations, please let me know :).
[1] has number of
On 07/04/2014 08:44 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
Given the holiday weekend in US, I feel that it would be appropriate
to move the 3.6 feature freeze date to mid next week so that we can
have more reviews done address review comments too. We can still
continue to track other milestones as per our
On 07/04/2014 11:15 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
There is an improved implementation of trash in gerrit and can help get
more traction with more reviews, rebases etc.
I see nine patches for this, all failing verification and all but one
inactive since March 10. Given our review rate, is this likely
On 07/05/2014 01:59 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 04/07/2014, at 1:14 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
Hi All,
I have pulled together some statistics from gerrit for fun. The statistics that
I have generated are limited by my understanding of gerrit's gsql interface. I
don't claim that these stats
On 07/06/2014 07:47 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi Justin/Vijay,
I always felt '-1' saying 'I prefer you didn't submit this' is a
bit harsh. Most of the times all it means is 'Need some more changes' Do
you think we can change this message?
The message can be changed. What would
On 07/09/2014 10:09 AM, Viktor Villafuerte wrote:
Hi all,
On Gluster website I can see section Language bindings for the
libgfapi C library for Java/Python/.. However I cannot find any
documentation of the interface itself.
Are there any docs on how to use libgfapi using C?
The api header
On 07/09/2014 09:56 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
BTW: doc/hacker-guide/en-US/markdown/unittest.md seems to lack info on how
to write tests/bugs/bug-*.t files.
unittest.md is for writing code unit tests using cmockery.
some details about writing tests/bugs/bug-*.t files is available at [1].
On 07/08/2014 01:54 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
In the test case, we are checking gluster snap status to see if all the
bricks are alive. One of the snap bricks fail to start up, and hence we
see the failure. The brick fails to bind with Address already in use
error. But if we see clearly that same
On 07/10/2014 02:23 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 10/07/2014, at 9:45 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 09:33:01PM +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
That v3.5qa2 tag name on master is annoying, due to the RPM
naming it causes when building on master.
Did we figure out a solution?
Maybe
Hi All,
A new branch, 'release-3.6', has been branched from this commit in master:
commit 950f9d8abe714708ca62b86f304e7417127e1132
Author: Jeff Darcy jda...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jul 8 21:56:04 2014 -0400
dht: fix rename race
You can checkout this branch through:
$git checkout -b
[Adding gluster-devel]
On 07/18/2014 05:20 PM, Andrew Lau wrote:
Hi all,
As most of you have got hints from previous messages, hosted engine
won't work on gluster . A quote from BZ1097639
Using hosted engine with Gluster backed storage is currently something
we really warn against.
I think
...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/18/2014 05:43 PM, Andrew Lau wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Vijay Bellur
vbel...@redhat.com mailto:vbel...@redhat.com wrote:
[Adding gluster-devel]
On 07/18/2014 05:20 PM, Andrew Lau wrote:
Hi all
On 08/01/2014 10:53 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
If there are no more comments, could we take
http://review.gluster.com/#/c/8343 in.
Thanks, have merged the patch.
-Vijay
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
On 08/06/2014 12:11 AM, David F. Robinson wrote:
I have been testing some of the fixes that Pranith incorporated into the
3.5.2-beta to see how they performed for moderate levels of i/o. All of
the stability issues that I had seen in previous versions seem to have
been fixed in 3.5.2; however,
Hi All,
GlusterFS 3.6 is still awaiting a few fixes to land - primarily from
afrv2, dht and user serviceable snapshots. Hence the release schedule
for 3.6 has been revised. The updated schedule can be found at [1].
Nightly builds from release-3.6 are now available at [2]. Testing
feedback
On 08/11/2014 11:20 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 08/09/2014 12:18 AM, Harshavardhana wrote:
Some initial thoughts on the solution based on Harsha/Joe/Emmanuel's
inputs are:
1) gluster volume heal volname info split-brain should give output in
some 'format' giving stat/pending-matrix
DESCRIPTION:A single instance of the following meeting has been modified:\n\
nSubject: Gluster Community Weekly Meeting \nOrganizer: Vijay Bellur vbel
l...@redhat.com \n\nLocation: #gluster-meeting on irc.freenode.net \nTime: W
ednesday\, August 13\, 2014\, 5:30:00 PM - 6:30:00 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai\, K
Hi All,
Patch and review statistics for the month of July:
[1] has number of patches sent by submitters in July 2014, [2] has
number of patches sent by submitters in 2014 till July 31st, [3] has
number of reviews done by reviewers in July 2014 and [4] has number of
reviews done by reviewers
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:Zimbra-Calendar-Provider
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Asia/Kolkata
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETTO:+0530
TZOFFSETFROM:+0530
TZNAME:IST
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:7b49ac44-ffca-4de4-a179-f9edde80bf1e
On 06/12/2014 09:06 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
Avra/Poornima,
Please look into this.
Patch == http://review.gluster.com/#/c/6483/9
Author== Poornima pguru...@redhat.com
Build triggered by== amarts
Build-url ==
On 09/05/2014 11:08 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Harshavardhana har...@harshavardhana.net wrote:
release-3.6 is already done some time ago - you have to post all the
patches to release-3.6 branch.
How much time ago? It would help to knowif I have to consider e.g.
patches from 18th august.
On 09/08/2014 05:33 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
Hi,
At last week's community meeting it was stated that we would release
3.4.6beta1 early this week.
The following fixes have been committed to the release-3.4 branch for
3.4.6 to date:
BUG: 1123289, commit
On 08/06/2014 06:26 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
- Original Message -
Did we get to break the tie? :)
Yep. Latest results are:
* 5:30 PM IST / 12:00 UTC - 47 votes (52%)
* 6:30 PM IST / 13:00 UTC - 9 votes (10%)
* 7:30 PM IST / 14:00 UTC - 12 votes (13%)
* 8:30 PM IST /
On 09/10/2014 12:22 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 09/09/2014, at 7:47 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 08/06/2014 06:26 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
- Original Message -
Did we get to break the tie? :)
Yep. Latest results are:
* 5:30 PM IST / 12:00 UTC - 47 votes (52%)
* 6:30 PM IST / 13
Getting right the alias for gluster-devel now ;-).
-Vijay
Original Message
Subject: [Gluster-users] Fwd: [ovirt-users] ovirt35 - deep dive -
Monitoring (UI plugin) Dashboard (Integrated with Nagios monitoring)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:13:37 +0530
From: Vijay Bellur vbel
On 09/18/2014 06:07 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 05:42:01PM +0530, Humble Devassy Chirammal wrote:
As decided in our last GlusterFS meeting and the 3.6 planning schedule, we
shall conduct GlusterFS 3.6 test days starting from next week.
I still have a few portability
On 09/18/2014 05:42 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal wrote:
Greetings,
As decided in our last GlusterFS meeting and the 3.6 planning schedule,
we shall conduct GlusterFS 3.6 test days starting from next week.
This time we intend testing one component and functionality per day.
GlusterFS
On 09/22/2014 03:27 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 21/09/2014, at 7:47 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 09/18/2014 05:42 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal wrote:
Greetings,
As decided in our last GlusterFS meeting and the 3.6 planning schedule,
we shall conduct GlusterFS 3.6 test days starting from next
Hi All,
I am happy to announce the availability of 3.6.0beta2 release for
testing. This release contains improvements in snapshot, afrv2, erasure
coding and has a few fixes for portability.
The source tarball is available at [1] and RPMs for Fedora 19,20,21,22
and RHEL/CentOS 5,6,7. are
On 09/26/2014 04:22 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 26/09/2014, at 7:16 AM, Kiran Patil wrote:
snip
Justin, Is CentOS 7 considered for regression testing or not ?
How about Fedora 19/20, which one do you recommend ?
The only OS that I know for sure regression testing works on is
CentOS 6.5.
We
On 10/01/2014 05:15 PM, Nux! wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone confirm whether 3.6 beta 3 contains this feature?
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8093/
Yes, beta 3 contains this feature.
-Vijay
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
On 10/13/2014 06:19 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Hello
Testing quota feature on NetBSD, I get strange results, I wonder if
this is what should happen.
If I set a directory quota to 4 MB, the start writing to it uwing
dd bs=1024k, I will get EDQUOTA after 15 blocks (that is 15 MB).
Is there a
:27 PM, Vijay Bellur vbel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
We are aiming to document all new features, CLIs, perceivable behavior
change or troubleshooting procedures for new features in admin-guide before
3.6.0 GA happens.
Here is a list of features from 3.6 that already have documentation
[Adding gluster-devel]
On 10/22/2014 06:50 PM, Michael Lessard wrote:
Hi list,
Deduplication is mentioned on the Gluster project page :
http://gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Projects
I'm wondering what is the priority for this feature to be added to
Gluster ? Is it already on
FYI - if you are interested in trying out libgfapi support with oVirt.
-Vijay
-- Forwarded message --
From: Federico Simoncelli fsimo...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:06 AM
Subject: [ovirt-devel] Using libgfapi on Gluster Storage Domains
To: oVirt Development
Hi All,
As we move closer to the release of 3.6.0, we are looking to add a
release maintainer for the 3.6.0 development branch (release-3.6).
Primary requirements for being this release maintainer would include:
1. Ensure regular minor releases of 3.6
2. Actively manage patches in the
Hi All,
Thanks to the efforts of several folks, the release notes for GlusterFS
3.6.0 is now available at [1]. Can you please review and provide
feedback on gerrit?
Thanks,
Vijay
[1] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8993/
___
Gluster-devel mailing
On 10/30/2014 06:45 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 10/30/2014 09:22 AM, Jaicel R. Sabonsolin wrote:
Hi Guys,
I need help with my ovirt Hosted-Engine HA setup. I am running on 2
ovirt hosts and 2 gluster nodes with replicated volumes. i already have
VMs running on my hosts and they can migrate
Hi All,
GlusterFS 3.6.0 is now generally available. GlusterFS 3.6.0 can be
downloaded from [1] and release notes are available at [2]. Upgrade
instructions can be found at [3]. Packages for various distributions
will be available shortly at the download site.
If you would like to propose
On 11/08/2014 08:19 AM, Peter Auyeung wrote:
I have a node down while gfs still open for writing.
Got tons of heal-failed on a replicated volume showing as gfid.
Tried gfid-resolver and got the following:
# ./gfid-resolver.sh /brick02/gfs/ 88417c43-7d0f-4ec5-8fcd-f696617b5bc1
On 11/09/2014 05:23 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
Hi,
we've been working on triaging bugs against unsupported versions. I
think we would do our community users a favour if we have a deprecated
or old unsupported version in Bugzilla. There should be no need for
users to select old versions that we do
On 11/08/2014 03:50 PM, Jaden Liang wrote:
Hi all,
We are testing BD xlator to verify the KVM running with gluster. After some
simple tests, we encountered a coredump of glusterfs lead by liblvm2app.so.
Hope some one here might give some advises about this issue.
We have debug for some time,
Hi All,
GlusterFS 3.6.1 tag was pushed to the repository last week and packages
for Fedora, RHEL CentOS are now available at [1].
This release has been made available to overcome some of the packaging
problems seen with 3.6.0 [2]. 3.6.1 contains this patch in addition to
3.6.0:
commit
[Adding gluster-users]
On 10/29/2014 12:11 PM, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
On Monday 27 October 2014 06:34 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
Hi All,
As we move closer to the release of 3.6.0, we are looking to add a
release maintainer for the 3.6.0 development branch (release-3.6).
Primary requirements
On 11/13/2014 03:11 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
Hey Jeff,
I'm trying to understand how the SSL support in socket-transport
works. I'm having a little trouble understanding it though.
Do you have any document describing how it works? Even user
documentation on how to use the feature will help.
This
On 11/16/2014 04:17 AM, Rudra Siva wrote:
same goes for fsync.
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Rudra Siva rudrasiv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In adding a new FOP and using writev as a reference, this may not be correct -
On 10/31/2014 04:09 PM, Venky Shankar wrote:
Hey folks,
Myself and Raghavendra (@rabhat) have been discussing about BitRot[1]
and came up with a list of high level tasks (breakup items) captured
here[2]. The pad will be updated on an ongoing basis reflecting the
current status/items that are
On 11/24/2014 05:55 PM, Kiran Patil wrote:
getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, {rlim_cur=1024, rlim_max=4*1024}) = 0
lstat(testfile, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
getxattr(testfile, system.posix_acl_access, 0x7fff9ce10d00, 132) =
-1 ENODATA (No data available)
stat(testfile,
On 11/28/2014 09:25 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:55:07 +0100
m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus) wrote:
snip
Some news on triggered NetBSD regression tests: we still have a few
test that always fail in basic. I tweaked the regression test
launching script to skip them, so that
On 11/28/2014 08:30 AM, Venky Shankar wrote:
[snip]
1. Can the bitd be one per node like self-heal-daemon and other global
services? I worry about creating 2 * N processes for N bricks in a node.
Maybe we can consider having one thread per volume/brick etc. in a single
bitd process to make it
On 11/28/2014 09:44 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:55:22PM +, Justin Clift wrote:
We're trying to get the NetBSD side of things running 100%, and
waiting on these is blocking us. ;)
And as the fix crop, I have a few others to share :-)
More the merrier :-).
Hi All,
Shall we set a goal for ourselves to be Coverity Scan clean by GlusterFS
3.7?
I think fixing problems reported in the incremental reports here would
be a good way of keeping the number of static analysis defects in
control. It would be great if developers who checked in code
On 12/01/2014 11:09 PM, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
Hi,
As per my understanding samba calls get_real_filename API to get the
actual case sensitive name of the entry. And get_real_filename calls
getxattr call with a key get_real_filename:entry name.
When I checked the glusterfs plugin's code in
On 11/28/2014 11:03 PM, Dave McAllister wrote:
Trying again for the Bitrot Discussion,
Dev 2nd, 1300 UTC / 0500 PST
Scheduled: http://bit.ly/12bAQDr
Having problems with the original event. Using this URL for today's hangout:
On 12/04/2014 12:44 AM, Ben England wrote:
I've expanded specification of two proposals for improving small-file
performance as new feature pages, referenced at the bottom of this list (not in
priority order I hope?). Could we possibly review these proposals at a
gluster.org meeting this
On 11/28/2014 01:08 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
Hi All,
To supplement our ongoing effort of better patch management, I am
proposing the addition of more sub-maintainers for various components.
The rationale behind this proposal the responsibilities of maintainers
continue to be the same
On 12/15/2014 11:13 AM, Aravinda wrote:
On 12/15/2014 10:39 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 12/11/2014 11:40 AM, Aravinda wrote:
Hi,
While geo-replication is running it keeps processed changelog files in
$WORKING_DIR/.processed or $WORKING_DIR/.history/.processed. These
changelog files are useful
On 12/15/2014 11:46 AM, Aravinda wrote:
On 12/15/2014 11:21 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 12/15/2014 11:13 AM, Aravinda wrote:
On 12/15/2014 10:39 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 12/11/2014 11:40 AM, Aravinda wrote:
Hi,
While geo-replication is running it keeps processed changelog files
On 12/15/2014 10:12 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
Nice effort
It would be good to mention how gluster is integrated for each of the
projects... Fuse, libgfapi etc?
For the ovirt case, it's used to store vm images, not VMs as u mention.
Also in ovirt, we support using Gluster in fuse and libgfapi
On 12/17/2014 04:48 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
Hi all,
In about 45 minutes from now we will have the regular weekly Gluster
Community
meeting.
Meeting minutes for this week can be found at [1].
Thanks,
Vijay
[1]
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2014-12-17/gluster-meeting.2014
Hi All,
We had a discussion today in #gluster-meeting about improving small file
performance in GlusterFS.next releases. Notes from the meeting can be
found at [1].
Thanks,
Vijay
[1]
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2014-12-19/gluster-meeting.2014-12-19-13.06.html
On 12/16/2014 10:59 PM, David F. Robinson wrote:
Gluster 3.6.1 seems to be having an issue creating symbolic links. To
reproduce this issue, I downloaded the file
dakota-6.1-public.src_.tar.gz from
https://dakota.sandia.gov/download.html
# gunzip dakota-6.1-public.src_.tar.gz
# tar -xf
On 12/20/2014 12:09 PM, David F. Robinson wrote:
Seems to work with -xPf. I obviously couldn't check all of the files,
but the two specific ones that I noted in my original email do not show
any problems when using -P...
This is related to the way tar extracts symbolic links by default its
DESCRIPTION:A single instance of the following meeting has been modified:\n\
nSubject: Gluster Community Weekly Meeting \nOrganizer: Vijay Bellur vbel
l...@redhat.com \n\nLocation: #gluster-meeting on irc.freenode.net \nTime: W
ednesday\, December 24\, 2014\, 5:30:00 PM - 6:30:00 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai
LAST-MODIFIED:20141222T124137Z
DTSTAMP:20141222T124137Z
SEQUENCE:8
DESCRIPTION:The following meeting has been cancelled:\n\nSubject: Gluster Co
mmunity Weekly Meeting \nOrganizer: Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com \n\n
Location: #gluster-meeting on irc.freenode.net \nTime: Wednesday\, December
24
please check if this resolves the problem without -P switch?
-Vijay
On Dec 21, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/20/2014 12:09 PM, David F. Robinson wrote:
Seems to work with -xPf. I obviously couldn't check all of the files,
but the two specific ones that I noted
A single bug reported by covscan this time.
KP, Kaushal - can you please check this out?
Thanks,
Vijay
Forwarded Message
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for GlusterFS
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 01:55:19 -0800
From: scan-ad...@coverity.com
To: vbel...@redhat.com
FYI.
Thanks Louis!
-Vijay
-- Forwarded message --
From: *Louis Zuckerman*m...@louiszuckerman.com
mailto:m...@louiszuckerman.com
Date: Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 8:54 PM
Subject: Ubuntu Debian packages
To: gluster-us...@gluster.org mailto:gluster-us...@gluster.org
I am gearing up
On 12/24/2014 02:30 PM, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
Hi,
I have a doubt. In user serviceable snapshots as of now statfs call is
not implemented. There are 2 ways how statfs can be handled.
1) Whenever snapview-client xlator gets statfs call on a path that
belongs to snapshot world, it can send the
gf_defrag_handle_migrate_error() seems broken at the moment.
/* if errno is not ENOSPC or ENOTCONN, we can still continue
with rebalance process */
if ((op_errno != ENOSPC) || (op_errno != ENOTCONN))
return 1;
if (op_errno == ENOTCONN) {
On 02/02/2015 09:14 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 02/02/2015 01:37 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 05:47:31PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
I see the following two patches in that state:
http://review.gluster.com/9456
http://review.gluster.com/9409
http
On 02/02/2015 01:37 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 05:47:31PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
I see the following two patches in that state:
http://review.gluster.com/9456
http://review.gluster.com/9409
http://review.gluster.com/#/q/status:submitted,n,z has a list of
On 02/06/2015 02:03 PM, Dan Lambright wrote:
Hi All, I hope this is not an overly stupid question..
Does anyone know a good way to test readdir (not readdirplus) on gluster?
I see in :
bugs/replicate/886998/strict-readdir.t
.. that there is a switch cluster.strict-readdir. It does not appear
On 02/04/2015 10:05 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
Thanks Niels. I've added links on each page to the other for now. We can
consolidate this when we find time.
You can pick up a few features from the community survey wishlist [1] too.
-Vijay
[1] http://goo.gl/MLPao6
On 01/21/2015 04:54 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
Hi all,
In about 40 minutes from now we will have the regular weekly Gluster
Community meeting.
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
- date: every Wednesday
- time: 7:00 EST, 12:00 UTC, 13:00 CET, 17:30 IST (in your terminal
On 01/14/2015 04:55 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
Hi all,
In about 40 minutes from now we will have the regular weekly Gluster
Community meeting.
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
- date: every Wednesday
- time: 7:00 EST, 12:00 UTC, 13:00 CET, 17:30 IST (in your terminal
On 01/19/2015 06:22 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
Hi All,
I had opened this feature request sometime back
http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Features/turn-off-glusterfs-proto-access
I wanted to know what would be the right way to implement this ?
The goal here is to have a
Hi all,
In about 40 minutes from now we will have the regular weekly Gluster
Community meeting.
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
- date: every Wednesday
- time: 7:00 EST, 12:00 UTC, 13:00 CET, 17:30 IST (in your terminal,
run: date -d 12:00 UTC)
- agenda:
Several coredumps are being generated in regression runs now [1]. Anyone
had a chance to look into this?
-Vijay
[1]
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/4233/consoleFull
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Hi All,
As we approach feature freeze for 3.7 (28th Feb), it would great to have
a status update for features being worked on for the release.
Action(s) needed for status updates:
1. If you are the owner for one of the features listed in the planning
page [1], can you please update status
Hi all,
In about 30 minutes from now we will have the regular weekly Gluster
Community meeting.
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
- date: every Wednesday
- time: 7:00 EST, 12:00 UTC, 13:00 CET, 17:30 IST (in your terminal,
run: date -d 12:00 UTC)
- agenda:
Hi All,
Thanks to everyone who responded to the recent community survey [1], we
have an idea of what you think would be necessary in GlusterFS. I have
tried to collate the wishlist of features under appropriate categories
here [2].
As a continuation of this, the approaching feature freeze
1 - 100 of 493 matches
Mail list logo
