Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 11: Revisting our proposed timeline and features

with the branching related activities? -Amar On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 3:24 PM Xavi Hernandez wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:40 AM Yaniv Kaul wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 8:41 AM Xavi Hernandez >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 4:03 AM Ama

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 11: Revisting our proposed timeline and features

Here is my honest take on this one. On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 3:06 PM Shwetha Acharya wrote: > It is time to evaluate the fulfillment of our committed > features/improvements and the feasibility of the proposed deadlines as per > Release > 11 tracker

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS storage driver deprecation in Kubernetes.

Thanks for the heads up Humble. This would help many of the gluster community users, who may not be following k8s threads actively to be planning their migration plans actively. For all the users who are currently running heketi + glusterfs, starting from k8s v1.26, you CANNOT use heketi +

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Smallfile-Replica-3] Performance report for Gluster Upstream - 30/12/2021 Test Status: FAIL (-7.91%)

Any PR to suspect here? On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 6:25 AM Gluster-jenkins wrote: > *Test details:* > RPM Location: Upstream > OS Version: Red-Hat-Enterprise-Linux 8.4-(Ootpa) > Baseline Gluster version: glusterfs-10.0-1 > Current Gluster version: glusterfs-20211228.b8e32c3-0.0 > Intermediate

Re: [Gluster-devel] mem-pool.c magic trailer causes SIGBUS, fix or remove?

Thanks for the initiative Paul. Let me answer the major question from the thread. > > Remove the trailer? Or fix it? Ideal one is to fix it, as we do use mem-pool info to identify leaks etc through statedumps of the process. Remove can be an option on SPARC to start with if fixing is time

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Freenode takeover and GlusterFS IRC channels

We (at least many developers and some users) actively use Slack at https://gluster.slack.com While I agree that it's not a free/open alternative to IRC, it does get many questions answered, and also gets communication happen related to the project. Regards, Amar On Mon, 7 Jun, 2021, 9:27 pm

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] high load when copy directory with many files

Hi Marco, this is really good test/info. Thanks. One more thing to observe is you are running such tests is 'gluster profile info', so the bottleneck fop is listed. Mohit, Xavi, in this parallel operations, the load may be high due to inodelk used in mds xattr update in dht? Or you guys suspect

Re: [Gluster-devel] Bugs summary jenkins job

I personally haven't checked it after migrating to GitHub. Haven't seen any PRs coming with bug reference either. IMO, ok to stop the job, and cleanup python2 reference. On Wed, 10 Mar, 2021, 7:21 pm Michael Scherer, wrote: > Hi, > > are we still using the bugs summary on >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Automatic clang-format for GitHub PRs

On Thu, 11 Feb, 2021, 9:19 pm Xavi Hernandez, wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:33 PM Amar Tumballi wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:29 PM Xavi Hernandez >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm wondering if enforcing clang

Re: [Gluster-devel] Automatic clang-format for GitHub PRs

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:29 PM Xavi Hernandez wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm wondering if enforcing clang-format for all patches is a good idea... > > I've recently seen patches where clang-format is doing changes on parts of > the code that have not been touched by the patch. Given that all files

Re: [Gluster-devel] New Testing Framework For Gluster

While I am going through the document, I would like people to take a look at what we had done - https://kadalu.io/rfcs/0002-test-framework-binnacle.html At least the goals looks similar, ie, simplify testing, make it language agnostic, and also provide distributed infra awareness. Our goal was to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Repository access and review policy

Add the Reviewers in comment for now! (@amarts is me on github). Lets see how better we can handle this. -Amar On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:46 PM Dmitry Antipov wrote: > Is it possible to request reviews for pull requests from the persons > without write access? > Considering myself as an

Re: [Gluster-devel] Toggle storage.linux-aio and volume restart

Depends on if posix_reconfigure() handles this option or not. If it handles it, then without volume restart, we can use it. -Amar On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 6:59 PM Dmitry Antipov wrote: > Is it expected that toggling storage.linux-aio should take an effect > immediately without > doing the full

Re: [Gluster-devel] Pull Request review workflow

Thanks for taking time on this, and sending this note Xavi! Some comments inline! On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 4:03 PM Xavi Hernandez wrote: > Hi all, > > after the recent switch to GitHub, I've seen that reviews that require > multiple iterations are hard to follow using the old workflow we were

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] [Gluster-Maintainers] ACTION REQUESTED: Migrate your glusterfs patches from Gerrit to GitHub

On Mon, 12 Oct, 2020, 8:08 pm sankarshan, wrote: > It is perhaps on Amar to send the PR with the changes - but that would > kind of make the approval/merge process a bit muddled? How about a PR > being sent for review and then merged in? > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 19:22, Kaleb Keithley wrote: >

Re: [Gluster-devel] ACTION REQUESTED: Migrate your glusterfs patches from Gerrit to GitHub

Thanks for getting this done, Deepshika and Michael, and Infra team members. Thanks everyone for valuable feedback during this process! I personally hope this change will help glusterfs project to attract more developers, and we can engage more closely with our developers! Note that this would

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 7.7

Hi Hu Bert, Thanks for letting us know about improvements. Now to check on possible reason, the question is, from which version did you upgrade to 7.7? Thanks On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:16 PM Hu Bert wrote: > Hi there, > > just wanted to say thanks to all the developers, maintainers etc.

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] [gluster-infra] build-jobs repo is migrated to Github

Thanks Deepshika and @misc, This is a great step for getting glusterfs project migrated. Regards, Amar On Mon, 22 Jun, 2020, 4:18 pm Deepshikha Khandelwal, wrote: > Hi All, > > We have migrated the build-jobs repo from Gerrit[1] to Github[2]. It is a > repository for automatically

Re: [Gluster-devel] Multithreaded Iterative Dir Tree Scan

This looks like a good effort to pick up Barak. A needed one indeed. -Amar On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 3:18 PM Barak Sason Rofman wrote: > Hello everyone! > Following a discussion I had with @Susant Palai some time ago, we have > decided to look into an option to improve the rebalance process in

[Gluster-devel] Updating the repository's actual 'ACTIVE'ness status

Hi all, We have 101 repositories in gluster org in github. Only handful of them are being actively managed, and progressing. After seeing https://github.com/gluster/gluster-kubernetes/issues/644, I feel we should at least keep the status of the project up-to-date in the repository, so the users

Re: [Gluster-devel] could you help to check about a glusterfs issue seems to be related to ctime

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:18 AM Zhou, Cynthia (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) < cynthia.z...@nokia-sbell.com> wrote: > Hi glusterfs expert, > > Our product need to tolerate change date to future and then change back. > > How about change like this ? > > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] ACL issue v6.6, v6.7, v7.1, v7.2

Hi Nikolov, On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 12:29 AM Strahil Nikolov wrote: > Hello List, > > Recently I had upgraded my oVirt + Gluster (v6.5 -> v6.6) and I hit an > ACL bug , which forced me to upgrade to v7.0 > > Another oVirt user also hit the bug when upgrading to v6.7 and he had to > rebuild

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Release-8] Thin-Arbiter: Unique-ID requirement

e feedback Atin. > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:42 PM Amar Tumballi wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> As we are gearing up for Release-8, and its planning, I wanted to bring >> up one of my favorite topics, 'Thin-Arbiter' (or Tie-Breaker/Metro-Cluster >> etc etc). >> >>

Re: [Gluster-devel] WORM-Xlator: How to get filepath in worm_create_cbk?

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 7:16 PM David Spisla wrote: > Dear Gluster Community, > in worm_create_cbk a file gets the xattr "trusted.worm_file" and > "trusted.start_time" if worm-file-level is enabled. Now I want to exclude > some files in a special folder from the WORM function. Therefore I want to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Do we still support the '"GlusterFS 3.3" RPC client?

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:02 AM Yaniv Kaul wrote: > Or can we remove this code? > In my opinion this should stay for at least another year! Especially because we still have products and user deployment which use 3.x version in them. While we say from community that we don't 'support' any old

[Gluster-devel] [Release-8] Planning Meeting update

#280 <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/280> Amar Tumballi - Instrumentation - Logging : - Structured logging Issue #657 <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/657> Yati P - Observability : - More documentation on how to use prometheus or ot

[Gluster-devel] [Release-8] Checking on the work done for reflink (#349)

Hi Raghavendra, Pranith, I have ambitiously tagged Issue #349 for Release-8. It was mainly done as there were some work done in that regard last year. I wanted to understand if it is possible to take it to a basic level of completion so it can

[Gluster-devel] [Release-8] Thin-Arbiter: Unique-ID requirement

Hello, As we are gearing up for Release-8, and its planning, I wanted to bring up one of my favorite topics, 'Thin-Arbiter' (or Tie-Breaker/Metro-Cluster etc etc). We have made thin-arbiter release in v7.0 itself, which works great, when we have just 1 cluster of gluster. I am talking about a

Re: [Gluster-devel] Following up on the Gluster 8 conversation from the community meeting

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:55 AM Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay < sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I had mentioned that I'll reach out to Amar to urge about making > progress on Gluster 8. We did have a conversation and upon reviewing > the present state of the list of issues/features with

Re: [Gluster-devel] What do extra_free and extrastd_free params do in the dictionary object?

On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 2:33 PM Xavi Hernandez wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 9:44 AM Amar Tumballi wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 1:38 PM Xavi Hernandez >> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 4:56 PM Yaniv Kaul wrote: >>> >

Re: [Gluster-devel] What do extra_free and extrastd_free params do in the dictionary object?

On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 1:38 PM Xavi Hernandez wrote: > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 4:56 PM Yaniv Kaul wrote: > >> I could not find a relevant use for them. Can anyone enlighten me? >> > > I'm not sure why they are needed. They seem to be used to keep the > unserialized version of a dict around

Re: [Gluster-devel] Infra & Tests: Few requests

On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 10:10 PM Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 4:07 PM Amar Tumballi wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> First thing first - Happy 2020 !! Hope this year will be great for all of >> us :-) >> >> Few requests to begin the ne

[Gluster-devel] Infra & Tests: Few requests

Hi Team, First thing first - Happy 2020 !! Hope this year will be great for all of us :-) Few requests to begin the new year! 1. Lets please move all the fedora builders to F31. - There can be some warnings with F31, so we can start with 'skip' mode and once fixed enabled to vote. 2.

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] periodical warnings in brick-log after upgrading to gluster 7.1

On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 9:50 PM Michael Böhm wrote: > Hello, > > i've finally upgraded our gluster-server to 7.1 (3.8 debian stretch -> > gluster-repo 3.12 -> gluster-repo 7.1) and it actually went real smooth. > There is just that warning in all brick-logs and every server every 15min i > can't

Re: [Gluster-devel] Expanding Volume problem in old release 3.12.2

After expand, you need to run rebalance (at least the fix-layout) to get the files get distributed to newer bricks. Regards, Amar -- https://kadalu.io On Wed, 25 Dec, 2019, 9:34 AM PSC, <1173701...@qq.com> wrote: > Hello, > I have a glusterfs deployment, the version of which is 3.12.2. When I

[Gluster-devel] Gluster Release 8.0: Call for proposals

Hello everyone, For a change, you are seeing me posting release planning email, instead of Shyam, (and recently Rinku/Hari). Just today, I summed up my thoughts on Gluster’s release planning in my blog [1]. Continuation of that, I am asking for providing your valuable feedback on what are the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Modifying gluster's logging mechanism

Hi Barak, My replies inline. On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 6:34 PM Barak Sason Rofman wrote: > Hello Gluster community, > > My name is Barak and I’ve joined RH gluster development in August. > Shortly after my arrival, I’ve identified a potential problem with > gluster’s logging mechanism and I’d

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal to change gNFS status

Responses inline. On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 6:04 PM Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 04:01:23PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > As per the discussion on https://review.gluster.org/23645, recently we > > changed the status of gNFS (glu

[Gluster-devel] Fwd: Proposal to change gNFS status

vities into this Direction we see in the Future. I understand this is may just some Words from 1 user,…. But may some others thinking Similar. Appreciated and Thx for Reading. Max *From:* Amar Tumballi *Sent:* Donnerstag, 21. November 2019 11:31 *To:* GlusterFS Maintainers *Cc:* Gluster

[Gluster-devel] Proposal to change gNFS status

Hi All, As per the discussion on https://review.gluster.org/23645, recently we changed the status of gNFS (gluster's native NFSv3 support) feature to 'Depricated / Orphan' state. (ref: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/master/MAINTAINERS#L185..L189). With this email, I am proposing to

Re: [Gluster-devel] [RFC] inode table locking contention reduction experiment

-limit.t tests/bugs/shard/shard-inode-refcount-test.t Ideal is to run the full regression with `./run-tests.sh -c` Regards, Amar On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 9:21 AM Changwei Ge wrote: > Hi Amar, > > On 2019/10/31 6:30 下午, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, O

Re: [Gluster-devel] [RFC] inode table locking contention reduction experiment

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 4:32 PM Xavi Hernandez wrote: > Hi Changwei, > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 7:56 AM Changwei Ge > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am recently working on reducing inode_[un]ref() locking contention by >> getting rid of inode table lock. Just use inode lock to protect inode >> REF. I

Re: [Gluster-devel] [RFC] various lists on inode table usage?

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 1:02 PM Changwei Ge wrote: > Hi Amar, > > Thank you very much for your quick reply :-) > > On 2019/10/21 2:44 下午, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:58 AM Changwei Ge > <mailto:c...@linux.alibaba.com>

Re: [Gluster-devel] [RFC] various lists on inode table usage?

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:58 AM Changwei Ge wrote: > Hi, > > I am recently working on optimizing inode searching/getting/putting > concurrency. Before the experiment/trial goes, I would like to get fully > understand what the usage of several lists of inode table, especially > for 'invalidate

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS API to manipulate open file descriptor - glfs_fcntl?

It would be great if you can point at the requirements, or new additions you are talking about. On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:26 PM Anoop C S wrote: > Hi all, > > This is to check and confirm whether we have an API(or an internal > implementation which can be exposed as API) to perform operations

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal: move glusterfs development to github workflow, completely

On Mon, 14 Oct, 2019, 5:37 PM Niels de Vos, wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 03:52:30PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > Any thoughts on this? > > > > I tried a basic .travis.yml for the unified glusterfs repo I am > > maintaining, and it is good enough fo

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal: move glusterfs development to github workflow, completely

h github migration. We surely need suggestion and volunteers > here to get this going. > > Regards, > Amar > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:38 PM Niels de Vos wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 06:57:14AM +0530, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan >> wrote: >&g

Re: [Gluster-devel] Query regards to expose client-pid to fuse process

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 5:05 PM Mohit Agrawal wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, you are right it is not a default value. > > We can assign the client_pid only while volume has mounted after through a > glusterfs binary directly like > /usr/local/sbin/glusterfs --process-name fuse

Re: [Gluster-devel] RDMA in GlusterFs

t; > That said, Officially GlusterFs doesn't support RDMA on master branch. > > [1] : > https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2018-July/034400.html > > > Regards > Rafi KC > > > > > > Does anyone use RDMA in Glusterfs before? What’s RDMA us

[Gluster-devel] kadalu - k8s storage with Gluster

Hi Gluster users, I am not sure how many of you use Gluster for your k8s storage (or even considering to use). I have some good news for you. Last month, I along with Aravinda spoke at DevConf India, about project kadalu. The code & README available @ https://github.com/kadalu/kadalu. We are

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal: move glusterfs development to github workflow, completely

and volunteers here to get this going. Regards, Amar On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:38 PM Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 06:57:14AM +0530, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:10 AM Niels de Vos wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal: move glusterfs development to github workflow, completely

hich we can actually do 'rebase and merge' option, which can preserve the commits as is. -Amar > Niels > ___ > maintainers mailing list > maintain...@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts)

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal: move glusterfs development to github workflow, completely

On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 4:33 PM Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay < sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 6:42 PM Amar Tumballi wrote: > > > > Hi developers, > > > > With this email, I want to understand what is the general feeling around >

[Gluster-devel] Proposal: move glusterfs development to github workflow, completely

Hi developers, With this email, I want to understand what is the general feeling around this topic. We from gluster org (in github.com/gluster) have many projects which follow complete github workflow, where as there are few, specially the main one 'glusterfs', which uses 'Gerrit'. While this

Re: [Gluster-devel] [RFC] alter inode table lock from mutex to rwlock

APAC Schedule - > Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST > Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/836554017 > > NA/EMEA Schedule - > Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM EDT > Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/486278655 > > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org &g

Re: [Gluster-devel] URGENT: Release 7 blocked due to patches failing centos regression

Looks like these issues are now fixed in master. Need a port to release-7 branch, and other patches has to be taken in. On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 12:35 PM Rinku Kothiya wrote: > Hi Team, > > The following patches posted in release 7 are failing centos regression. > For some of the patches I have

Re: [Gluster-devel] directory filehandles

On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 7:33 AM Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > Hello > > I have trouble figuring the whole story about how to cope with FUSE > directory filehandles in the NetBSD implementation. > > libfuse makes a special use of filehandles exposed to filesystem for > OPENDIR, READDIR, FSYNCDIR, and

[Gluster-devel] [Announcement] Gluster Community Update

source <https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/red-hat-and-ibm-accelerating-adoption-open-source> - FAQ on Red Hat Community Blog <https://community.redhat.com/blog/2019/07/faq-for-communities/> Amar Tumballi, Maintainer, Lead, Gluster Community.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Migration of the builders to Fedora 30

On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 9:55 PM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan < atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 9:37 PM Michael Scherer > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have upgraded for testing some of the builder to F30 (because F28 is >> EOL and peop

[Gluster-devel] GlusterFS 8+: Roadmap ahead - Open for discussion

Hello everyone, This email is long, and I request each one of you to participate and give comments. We want your collaboration in this big step. TL;DR; We are at an interesting time in Gluster project’s development roadmap. In the last year, we have taken some hard decisions to not focus on

Re: [Gluster-devel] Migration of the builders to Fedora 30

Infrastructure > > > > ___ > > Community Meeting Calendar: > > APAC Schedule - > Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST > Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/836554017 > > NA/EMEA Schedule -

Re: [Gluster-devel] Removing glupy from release 5.7

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 2:35 PM Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 02:11:21PM +0530, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 1:13 PM Niels de Vos wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 11:36:46AM +0530, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Removing glupy from release 5.7

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 1:13 PM Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 11:36:46AM +0530, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote: > > Considering python3 is anyways the future, I vote for taking the patch we > > did in master for fixing regression tests with python3 int

Re: [Gluster-devel] Removing glupy from release 5.7

> > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:43 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan < > > > > > atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We recently n

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 7: Gentle Reminder, Regression health for release-6.next and release-7

9-06-14 >> >> Please file a bug if needed against the test case and report the same >> here, in case a problem is already addressed, then do send back the >> patch details that addresses this issue as a response to this mail. >> >> Regards >> Rinku >> >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Project Update: Containers-based distributed tests runner

017 > > NA/EMEA Schedule - > Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM EDT > Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/486278655 > > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) _

[Gluster-devel] Quick Update: a cleanup patch and subsequent build failures

syscall.h after header cleanup in one of the recent patches, we cleaned-up the unneccesary header file includes. In the order of merging the patches, there cropped up an compile error. updates: bz#1193929 Change-Id: I2ad52aa918f9c698d5273bb293838de6dd50ac31 Signed-off-by: Amar

Re: [Gluster-devel] Seems like Smoke job is not voting

, 2019 at 5:16 PM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan < atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > I see patches starting from 10:45 AM IST (7hrs before) are not getting > smoke votes. > > For one of my patch, the smoke job is not triggered at all IMO. > > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/22863/ &g

[Gluster-devel] Seems like Smoke job is not voting

I see patches starting from 10:45 AM IST (7hrs before) are not getting smoke votes. For one of my patch, the smoke job is not triggered at all IMO. https://review.gluster.org/#/c/22863/ Would be good to check it. Regards, Amar ___ Community Meeting

Re: [Gluster-devel] Removing glupy from release 5.7

o the BZ with the build error and patches that attempt > > > fixing it? > > > > > > We normally do not remove features with minor updates. Fixing the build > > > error would be the preferred approach. > > > > > > Thanks, > > &

Re: [Gluster-devel] Linux 5.2-RC regression bisected, mounting glusterfs volumes fails after commit: fuse: require /dev/fuse reads to have enough buffer capacity

sday at 01:00 PM EDT > Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/486278655 > > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Community Meeting Calenda

[Gluster-devel] Regression failure continues: 'tests/basic/afr/split-brain-favorite-child-policy.t`

< 197> '0 echo 0' Looks like when the error occurred, it took 80seconds. I see 2 different patches fail on this, would be good to analyze it further. Regards, Amar -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Community Meeting Calendar: APAC Schedule - Every 2

Re: [Gluster-devel] CI failure - NameError: name 'unicode' is not defined (related to changelogparser.py)

-devel >> >> ___ > > Community Meeting Calendar: > > APAC Schedule - > Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST > Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/836554017 > > NA/EMEA Schedule - > Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Fwd: Build failed in Jenkins: regression-test-with-multiplex #1359

vidual wrapper > function > > [atin] glusterd/svc: Stop stale process using the glusterd_proc_stop > > [Amar Tumballi] lcov: more coverage to shard, old-protocol, sdfs > > [Kotresh H R] tests/geo-rep: Add EC volume test case > > [Amar Tumballi] glusterfsd/cleanup: Protect graph object u

[Gluster-devel] Update: GlusterFS code coverage

All, I just wanted to update everyone about one of the initiatives we have undertaken, ie, increasing the overall code coverage of GlusterFS above 70%. You can have a look at current code coverage here: https://build.gluster.org/job/line-coverage/lastCompletedBuild/Line_20Coverage_20Report/ (This

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests are timing out in master branch

; > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Community Meeting Calendar: APAC Schedule - Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 6.2: Expected tagging on May 15th

; -- > > > > Regards, > > > > Hari Gowtham. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Hari Gowtham. > > > > -- > Regards, > Hari Gowtham. > ___ > &

Re: [Gluster-devel] nightly builds are available again, with slightly different versioning

> APAC Schedule - > Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST > Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/836554017 > > NA/EMEA Schedule - > Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM EDT > Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/486278655 > > Gluster-devel mailing list

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] gluster-block v0.4 is alive!

/gluster/gluster-block/ > [9] https://github.com/gluster/gluster-block/issues/new > > Cheers, > Team Gluster-Block! > ___ > Gluster-users mailing list > gluster-us...@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > -- Amar Tumba

Re: [Gluster-devel] Coverity scan - how does it ignore dismissed defects & annotations?

luster-glusterfs/view_defects >>> [2] https://review.gluster.org/#/c/22619/ >>> ___ >>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> &

Re: [Gluster-devel] glusterfsd memory leak issue found after enable ssl

shutdown whenever BIO > is freed. > > > _______ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Query regarding dictionary logic

istoric/blob/master/libglusterfs/src/dict.c >> >> >> >>> >>> Please share your view on the same. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mohit Agrawal >>> ___ >>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> Glu

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] One more way to contact Gluster team - Slack (gluster.slack.com)

cture needs, and has valid concerns from his perspective :-) I, on the other hand, bother more about code, users, and how to make sure we are up-to-date with other technologies and communities, from the engineering view point. > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019, 3:16 AM Michael Scherer wrote: >&g

[Gluster-devel] One more way to contact Gluster team - Slack (gluster.slack.com)

Hi All, We wanted to move to Slack from IRC for our official communication channel from sometime, but couldn't as we didn't had a proper URL for us to register. 'gluster' was taken and we didn't knew who had it registered. Thanks to constant ask from Satish, Slack team has now agreed to let us

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Proposal: Changes in Gluster Community meetings

carve out an AI to get them fixed. <https://hackmd.io/OqZbh7gfQe6uvVUXUVKJ5g?both#RoundTable>RoundTable - Regards, Amar On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 8:53 PM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan < atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback Darrell, > > The new proposal is to hav

Re: [Gluster-devel] test failure reports for last 15 days

rs to see why the number of failures are so high >> against few tests. >> >> [1] >> https://fstat.gluster.org/summary?start_date=2019-01-26_date=2019-02-25=all >> > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluste

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Proposal: Changes in Gluster Community meetings

ing 12 hours opposed to the one you’re proposing? > > -Darrell > > On Mar 25, 2019, at 4:25 AM, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan < > atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > > All, > > We currently have 3 meetings which are public: > > 1. Maintainer's Meeting > > -

[Gluster-devel] Proposal: Changes in Gluster Community meetings

All, We currently have 3 meetings which are public: 1. Maintainer's Meeting - Runs once in 2 weeks (on Mondays), and current attendance is around 3-5 on an avg, and not much is discussed. - Without majority attendance, we can't take any decisions too. 2. Community meeting - Supposed to happen

[Gluster-devel] GlusterFS v7.0 (and v8.0) roadmap discussion

Hello Gluster Members, We are now done with glusterfs-6.0 release, and the next up is glusterfs-7.0. But considering for many 'initiatives', 3-4 months are not enough time to complete the tasks, we would like to call for a road-map discussion meeting for calendar year 2019 (covers both

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

honest we only use quotas. We got scared of trying out new >> performance features that potentially would open up a new back of issues. >> >> Sorry for being such a buzzkill. I really wanted it to be different. >> >> Cheers, >> Hans Henrik >> On 19/07/2018 08.56,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

the versions you tried ? We hope in coming months, our recent focus on Stability and Technical debt reduction will help you to re-look at Gluster after sometime. > Cheers, > Hans Henrik > On 19/07/2018 08.56, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > > * Hi all, Over last 12 years of Gluster,

Re: [Gluster-devel] Github#268 Compatibility with Alpine Linux

org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Glusterfsd crashed with SIGSEGV

/5.4-r0/sysroot-destdir/usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0.0.1: >>> not a dynamic executable >>> pabhishe@arn-build3$ldd >>> ./5.4-r0/sysroot-destdir/usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0.0.1 >>> not a dynamic executable >>> >>> >>> For backtraces I ha

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Glusterfsd crashed with SIGSEGV

more_data = 1 >> #22 0x3fffb7842ec0 in .xdr_gfx_dirplist () from >> /usr/lib64/libgfxdr.so.0 >> No symbol table info available. >> #23 0x3fffb7764c28 in __GI_xdr_reference (xdrs=0x3fffb1686d20, >> pp=0x3fffa81090f0, size=, proc=) at >> xdr_ref.c:84 >&g

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Glusterfsd crashed with SIGSEGV

obj_size=, >> xdr_obj=@0x3fff95c6a4b0: 0x3fff95c4ddc0 <.xdr_gfx_dirplist>) at >> xdr_ref.c:135 >> #31 0x3fff95c4dec0 in .xdr_gfx_dirplist () from >> /usr/lib64/libgfxdr.so.0 >> #32 0x3fff95b6fc28 in __GI_xdr_reference (xdrs=0x3fff90391d20, >> pp=0x3fff7c1312a0, size=, proc=) at >> xdr_ref.c:84 >> #33 0x3fff95b6fe04 in __GI_xdr_pointer (xdrs=0x3fff90391d20, >> objpp=0x3fff7c1312a0, obj_size=, >> xdr_obj=@0x3fff95c6a4b0: 0x3fff95c4ddc0 <.xdr_gfx_dirplist>) at >> xdr_ref.c:135 >> >> Frames are getting repeated, could any one please me. >> -- >> Regards >> Abhishek Paliwal >> > > > -- > > > > > Regards > Abhishek Paliwal > ___ > Gluster-users mailing list > gluster-us...@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS - 6.0RC - Test days (27th, 28th Feb)

Thanks to those who participated. Update at present: We found 3 blocker bugs in upgrade scenarios, and hence have marked release as pending upon them. We will keep these lists updated about progress. -Amar On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:41 PM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan < atumb...@redhat.com>

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Version uplift query

gt; >> Regards >> Abhishek >> > > > -- > > > > > Regards > Abhishek Paliwal > ___ > Gluster-users mailing list > gluster-us...@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -

[Gluster-devel] GlusterFS - 6.0RC - Test days (27th, 28th Feb)

ade to 6.0 version. Regards, Gluster Ants. -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFs v4.1.5: Need help on bitrot detection

test case > > *(See attached file: bug-1207627-bitrot-scrub-status.7z)* > > Note: *Enough memory is available on the system*. > > Regards, > Chandranana Naik > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gl

Re: [Gluster-devel] md-cache: May bug found in md-cache.c

Spisla wrote: > Hello Amar, > > > > no problem. How can I do that? Can you please tell me the procedure? > > > > Regards > > David > > > > *Von:* Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2019 14:18 > *An:* David Spisla >

  1   2   3   4   >