On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote:
> All,
>
> Thanks for participating actively in the discussions. With all your
> co-operation we now have a update on maintainers 2.0 proposal. Vijay Bellur
> sent a patch last week [1] capturing all the discussions.
>
>
Le mardi 18 avril 2017 à 10:25 +0200, Niels de Vos a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 04:53:55PM -0700, Amye Scavarda wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Michael Scherer
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Le jeudi 13 avril 2017 à 18:01 -0700, Amye Scavarda a écrit :
> > > > In
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 04:53:55PM -0700, Amye Scavarda wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Michael Scherer
> wrote:
>
> > Le jeudi 13 avril 2017 à 18:01 -0700, Amye Scavarda a écrit :
> > > In light of community conversations, I've put some revisions on the
> > >
Following up on this, this revision cycle is meant to be more clear about
owners + peers, and less focused on the Red Hat shorthand for levels of
responsibility.
As far as further goals, I think we can outline Architects and Leads
responsibility in a further cycle. I'll let Vijay respond to a
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Michael Scherer
wrote:
> Le jeudi 13 avril 2017 à 18:01 -0700, Amye Scavarda a écrit :
> > In light of community conversations, I've put some revisions on the
> > Maintainers changes, outlined in the hackmd pad:
> >
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:40:35AM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le jeudi 13 avril 2017 à 18:01 -0700, Amye Scavarda a écrit :
> > In light of community conversations, I've put some revisions on the
> > Maintainers changes, outlined in the hackmd pad:
> > https://hackmd.io/s/SkwiZd4qe
> >
> >
Le jeudi 13 avril 2017 à 18:01 -0700, Amye Scavarda a écrit :
> In light of community conversations, I've put some revisions on the
> Maintainers changes, outlined in the hackmd pad:
> https://hackmd.io/s/SkwiZd4qe
>
> Feedback welcomed!
>
> Note that the goals of this are to expand out our
In light of community conversations, I've put some revisions on the
Maintainers changes, outlined in the hackmd pad:
https://hackmd.io/s/SkwiZd4qe
Feedback welcomed!
Note that the goals of this are to expand out our reach as a project
(Gluster.org) and make it easy to define who's a maintainer
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> > Cc: "Amar Tumballi" , "GlusterFS
- Original Message -
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> To: "Michael Scherer"
> Cc: "Amar Tumballi" , "GlusterFS Maintainers"
> , "Gluster Devel"
>
> Sent: Friday,
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We have been working on a proposal [1] to make the lifecycle management
>> of Gluster maintainers more
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Amar Tumballi
> wrote:
>
>> I don't want to take the discussions in another direction, but want
>> clarity on few things:
>>
>> 1. Does maintainers
12 matches
Mail list logo