I recently added 3 builders builder208, builder209, builder210 to the
regression pool. Network to these new builders did not come up because it
was looking for non-existing ethernet card eth0 on reboot and hence
failing. I'll reconnect them back and update here once I fix the issue
today.
Sorry
What was the result of this investigation? I suspect seeing the same issue
on builder209[1].
Y.
[1] https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/6302/consoleFull
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 5:40 PM Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le vendredi 05 avril 2019 à 16:55 +0530, Nithya Balachandran a écrit :
>
Le vendredi 05 avril 2019 à 16:55 +0530, Nithya Balachandran a écrit :
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 12:16, Michael Scherer
> wrote:
>
> > Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 18:24 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> > > Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 19:10 +0300, Yaniv Kaul a écrit :
> > > > I'm not convinced this is
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 12:16, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 18:24 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> > Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 19:10 +0300, Yaniv Kaul a écrit :
> > > I'm not convinced this is solved. Just had what I believe is a
> > > similar
> > > failure:
> > >
> > >
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 9:55 AM Deepshikha Khandelwal
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 12:16 PM Michael Scherer
> wrote:
>
>> Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 18:24 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit :
>> > Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 19:10 +0300, Yaniv Kaul a écrit :
>> > > I'm not convinced this is
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 12:16 PM Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 18:24 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> > Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 19:10 +0300, Yaniv Kaul a écrit :
> > > I'm not convinced this is solved. Just had what I believe is a
> > > similar
> > > failure:
> > >
> > >
Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 18:24 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 19:10 +0300, Yaniv Kaul a écrit :
> > I'm not convinced this is solved. Just had what I believe is a
> > similar
> > failure:
> >
> > *00:12:02.532* A dependency job for rpc-statd.service failed. See
> >
Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 19:10 +0300, Yaniv Kaul a écrit :
> I'm not convinced this is solved. Just had what I believe is a
> similar
> failure:
>
> *00:12:02.532* A dependency job for rpc-statd.service failed. See
> 'journalctl -xe' for details.*00:12:02.532* mount.nfs: rpc.statd is
> not
I'm not convinced this is solved. Just had what I believe is a similar
failure:
*00:12:02.532* A dependency job for rpc-statd.service failed. See
'journalctl -xe' for details.*00:12:02.532* mount.nfs: rpc.statd is
not running but is required for remote locking.*00:12:02.532*
mount.nfs: Either use
Thanks misc. I have always seen a pattern that on a reattempt (recheck
centos) the same builder is picked up many time even though it's promised
to pick up the builders in a round robin manner.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 7:24 PM Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 15:19 +0200, Michael
Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 15:19 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 13:53 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> > Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 16:13 +0530, Atin Mukherjee a écrit :
> > > Based on what I have seen that any multi node test case will fail
> > > and
> > > the
> > >
Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 13:53 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 16:13 +0530, Atin Mukherjee a écrit :
> > Based on what I have seen that any multi node test case will fail
> > and
> > the
> > above one is picked first from that group and If I am correct none
> > of
> >
Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 16:13 +0530, Atin Mukherjee a écrit :
> Based on what I have seen that any multi node test case will fail and
> the
> above one is picked first from that group and If I am correct none of
> the
> code fixes will go through the regression until this is fixed. I
> suspect it
13 matches
Mail list logo
