Re: [Gluster-devel] Release Management Process change - proposal

2016-06-03 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Aravinda wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > Discovered two regression issues in Geo-rep, identified the fix and patch > posted to master and release-3.7. Waiting for regression tests run. > > Is it possible to take these patches for 3.7.12? Sure, I will

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release Management Process change - proposal

2016-06-03 Thread Aravinda
Hi Vijay, Discovered two regression issues in Geo-rep, identified the fix and patch posted to master and release-3.7. Waiting for regression tests run. Is it possible to take these patches for 3.7.12? Master: BZ http://review.gluster.org/14636 http://review.gluster.org/14425 Release-3.7:

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release Management Process change - proposal

2016-06-02 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > Since we do not have any objections to this proposal, let us do the > following for 3.7.12: > > 1. Treat June 1st as the cut-off for patch acceptance in release-3.7. > 2. I will tag 3.7.12rc1 on June 2nd. Gentle reminder

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release Management Process change - proposal

2016-05-29 Thread Vijay Bellur
Since we do not have any objections to this proposal, let us do the following for 3.7.12: 1. Treat June 1st as the cut-off for patch acceptance in release-3.7. 2. I will tag 3.7.12rc1 on June 2nd. 3. All maintainers to ack content and stability of components by June 9th. 4. Release 3.7.12 around

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release Management Process change - proposal

2016-05-13 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Aravinda wrote: > +1 from Geo-rep. > > Will explicit ack to be done in the mailing list? > Yes, sending out a note on gluster-devel would be appropriate. A description of tests done etc. in the note would help us track and improve quality

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release Management Process change - proposal

2016-05-13 Thread Aravinda
+1 from Geo-rep. Will explicit ack to be done in the mailing list? regards Aravinda On 05/10/2016 12:01 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: Hi All, We are blocked on 3.7.12 owing to this proposal. Appreciate any feedback on this! Thanks, Vijay On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Vijay Bellur

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release Management Process change - proposal

2016-05-09 Thread Vijay Bellur
Hi All, We are blocked on 3.7.12 owing to this proposal. Appreciate any feedback on this! Thanks, Vijay On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > Hi All, > > We have encountered a spate of regressions in recent 3.7.x releases. The > 3.7.x maintainers are

[Gluster-devel] Release Management Process change - proposal

2016-04-28 Thread Vijay Bellur
Hi All, We have encountered a spate of regressions in recent 3.7.x releases. The 3.7.x maintainers are facing additional burdens to ensure functional, performance and upgrade correctness. I feel component maintainers should own these aspects of stability as we own the components and