Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t - fails almost all the times in mainline

2018-02-20 Thread Nigel Babu 
Aha. Thanks Mohit. That was infra. Sorry about that. The first line in
/etc/hosts said

::1 localhost   localhost.localdomain   localhost6
localhost6.localdomain6

Once I removed it, the tests started running faster. I'll update my patch
to remove this particular test from timeout fix

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:42 AM, Mohit Agrawal  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I think as per test logs it is showing most of the taken by while test
> case is trying to mount a volume through nfs
> with a nolock option, i think it needs to be checked by nfs team why it is
> taking more time
>
> 
>
> sudo grep -i "mount_nfs" -A 1 d-backends-patchy.log
> [2018-02-21 04:55:56.466891]:++ G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t:
> TEST: 17 mount_nfs builder500.cloud.gluster.org:/patchy /mnt/nfs/0 nolock
> ++
> [2018-02-21 04:55:59.496667]:++ G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t:
> TEST: 18 Y force_umount /mnt/nfs/0 ++
> --
> [2018-02-21 04:56:24.943041]:++ G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t:
> TEST: 25 mount_nfs localhost:/patchy /mnt/nfs/0 nolock ++
> [2018-02-21 04:58:29.986140]:++ G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t:
> TEST: 26 Y force_umount /mnt/nfs/0 ++
> --
> [2018-02-21 04:58:54.419774]:++ G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t:
> TEST: 32 ! mount_nfs localhost:/patchy /mnt/nfs/0 nolock ++
> [2018-02-21 05:00:59.463965]:++ G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t:
> TEST: 33 gluster --mode=script --wignore volume reset patchy force
> ++
> --
> [2018-02-21 05:01:19.095653]:++ G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t:
> TEST: 39 ! mount_nfs localhost:/patchy /mnt/nfs/0 nolock ++
> [2018-02-21 05:03:24.150833]:++ G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t:
> TEST: 42 gluster --mode=script --wignore volume set patchy
> nfs.rpc-auth-reject 192.168.1.1 ++
> --
> [2018-02-21 05:03:44.550737]:++ G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t:
> TEST: 45 mount_nfs localhost:/patchy /mnt/nfs/0 nolock ++
> [2018-02-21 05:05:49.595573]:++ G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t:
> TEST: 46 Y force_umount /mnt/nfs/0 ++
> --
> [2018-02-21 05:06:15.297241]:++ G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t:
> TEST: 57 mount_nfs localhost:/patchy /mnt/nfs/0 nolock ++
> [2018-02-21 05:08:20.341869]:++ G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t:
> TEST: 58 Y force_umount /mnt/nfs/0 ++
>
> .
>
> Regards
> Mohit Agrawal
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa  > wrote:
>
>> +Mohit.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Atin Mukherjee 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/15/consoleFull 
>>> 20:24:36* 
>>> [20:24:39] Running tests in file ./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t*20:27:56* 
>>> ./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t timed out after 200 seconds*20:27:56* 
>>> ./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t: bad status 124
>>>
>>> This is just one of the instances, but I have seen this test failing in 
>>> last 3-4 days at least 10 times.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, it doesn't look like the regression actually passes in 
>>> mainline for any of the patches atm.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ___
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
nigelb
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t - fails almost all the times in mainline

2018-02-20 Thread Mohit Agrawal 
Hi,

I think as per test logs it is showing most of the taken by while test case
is trying to mount a volume through nfs
with a nolock option, i think it needs to be checked by nfs team why it is
taking more time



sudo grep -i "mount_nfs" -A 1 d-backends-patchy.log
[2018-02-21 04:55:56.466891]:++
G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t: TEST: 17 mount_nfs
builder500.cloud.gluster.org:/patchy /mnt/nfs/0 nolock ++
[2018-02-21 04:55:59.496667]:++
G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t: TEST: 18 Y force_umount /mnt/nfs/0
++
--
[2018-02-21 04:56:24.943041]:++
G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t: TEST: 25 mount_nfs localhost:/patchy
/mnt/nfs/0 nolock ++
[2018-02-21 04:58:29.986140]:++
G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t: TEST: 26 Y force_umount /mnt/nfs/0
++
--
[2018-02-21 04:58:54.419774]:++
G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t: TEST: 32 ! mount_nfs localhost:/patchy
/mnt/nfs/0 nolock ++
[2018-02-21 05:00:59.463965]:++
G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t: TEST: 33 gluster --mode=script
--wignore volume reset patchy force ++
--
[2018-02-21 05:01:19.095653]:++
G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t: TEST: 39 ! mount_nfs localhost:/patchy
/mnt/nfs/0 nolock ++
[2018-02-21 05:03:24.150833]:++
G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t: TEST: 42 gluster --mode=script
--wignore volume set patchy nfs.rpc-auth-reject 192.168.1.1 ++
--
[2018-02-21 05:03:44.550737]:++
G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t: TEST: 45 mount_nfs localhost:/patchy
/mnt/nfs/0 nolock ++
[2018-02-21 05:05:49.595573]:++
G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t: TEST: 46 Y force_umount /mnt/nfs/0
++
--
[2018-02-21 05:06:15.297241]:++
G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t: TEST: 57 mount_nfs localhost:/patchy
/mnt/nfs/0 nolock ++
[2018-02-21 05:08:20.341869]:++
G_LOG:./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t: TEST: 58 Y force_umount /mnt/nfs/0
++

.

Regards
Mohit Agrawal

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa 
wrote:

> +Mohit.
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Atin Mukherjee 
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> *https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/15/consoleFull 
>> 20:24:36* 
>> [20:24:39] Running tests in file ./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t*20:27:56* 
>> ./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t timed out after 200 seconds*20:27:56* 
>> ./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t: bad status 124
>>
>> This is just one of the instances, but I have seen this test failing in last 
>> 3-4 days at least 10 times.
>>
>> Unfortunately, it doesn't look like the regression actually passes in 
>> mainline for any of the patches atm.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t - fails almost all the times in mainline

2018-02-20 Thread Milind Changire 
wow! the very first test run on my CentOS 6.9 VM passed successfully within
1 minute
I'll now try this on a CentOS 7 VM


On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Nigel Babu  wrote:

> The immediate cause of this failure is that we merged the timeout patch
> which gives each test 200 seconds to finish. This test and another one
> takes over 200 seconds on regression nodes.
>
> I have a patch up to change the timeout https://review.gluster.org/#/
> c/19605/1
>
> However, tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t taking 897 seconds is in itself an
> abnormality and is worth looking into.
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Atin Mukherjee 
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> *https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/15/consoleFull 
>> 20:24:36* 
>> [20:24:39] Running tests in file ./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t*20:27:56* 
>> ./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t timed out after 200 seconds*20:27:56* 
>> ./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t: bad status 124
>>
>> This is just one of the instances, but I have seen this test failing in last 
>> 3-4 days at least 10 times.
>>
>> Unfortunately, it doesn't look like the regression actually passes in 
>> mainline for any of the patches atm.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel@gluster.org
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> nigelb
>



-- 
Milind
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t - fails almost all the times in mainline

2018-02-20 Thread Nigel Babu 
The immediate cause of this failure is that we merged the timeout patch
which gives each test 200 seconds to finish. This test and another one
takes over 200 seconds on regression nodes.

I have a patch up to change the timeout
https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19605/1

However, tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t taking 897 seconds is in itself an
abnormality and is worth looking into.

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Atin Mukherjee  wrote:

>
>
> *https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/15/consoleFull 
> 20:24:36* 
> [20:24:39] Running tests in file ./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t*20:27:56* 
> ./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t timed out after 200 seconds*20:27:56* 
> ./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t: bad status 124
>
> This is just one of the instances, but I have seen this test failing in last 
> 3-4 days at least 10 times.
>
> Unfortunately, it doesn't look like the regression actually passes in 
> mainline for any of the patches atm.
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
nigelb
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t - fails almost all the times in mainline

2018-02-20 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa 
+Mohit.

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Atin Mukherjee  wrote:

>
>
> *https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/15/consoleFull 
> 20:24:36* 
> [20:24:39] Running tests in file ./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t*20:27:56* 
> ./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t timed out after 200 seconds*20:27:56* 
> ./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t: bad status 124
>
> This is just one of the instances, but I have seen this test failing in last 
> 3-4 days at least 10 times.
>
> Unfortunately, it doesn't look like the regression actually passes in 
> mainline for any of the patches atm.
>
>
>
>
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t - fails almost all the times in mainline

2018-02-20 Thread Atin Mukherjee 
*https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/15/consoleFull
20:24:36*
[20:24:39] Running tests in file
./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t*20:27:56* ./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t
timed out after 200 seconds*20:27:56* ./tests/bugs/rpc/bug-921072.t:
bad status 124

This is just one of the instances, but I have seen this test failing
in last 3-4 days at least 10 times.

Unfortunately, it doesn't look like the regression actually passes in
mainline for any of the patches atm.
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel