On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Joseph Fernandes wrote:
>
> > ./tests/performance/open-behind.t is failing continuously on 3.7.11
>
> This is the fate of non enforced tests. It may be a good idea to
> invetigate it: perhaps NetBSD
Joseph Fernandes wrote:
> ./tests/performance/open-behind.t is failing continuously on 3.7.11
This is the fate of non enforced tests. It may be a good idea to
invetigate it: perhaps NetBSD gets a reliable failure for a rare bug
that is not NetBSD specific. We already saw
shan...@redhat.com>, "Gluster Devel"
> <gluster-devel@gluster.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 11:19:09 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/performance/open-behind.t fails on NetBSD
>
> Have you rebased your patch? open-behind.t is now marked bad.
>
Have you rebased your patch? open-behind.t is now marked bad.
~Atin
On 04/04/2016 11:16 AM, Ravishankar N wrote:
>
> Test Summary Report
> ---
> ./tests/performance/open-behind.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 18 Failed: 4)
> Failed tests: 15-18
>
>
>
Test Summary Report
---
./tests/performance/open-behind.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 18 Failed: 4)
Failed tests: 15-18
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/15553/consoleFull