Hi,
Both swift[1] and gluster-swift[2] calls posix_fadvise64() with
POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED
right after calling fdatasync() or fsync(). This is only performed during
object PUT operation
(writing an object to disk) suggesting the kernel that the data written is
no longer needed
with the hopes that ca
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:47:47AM -0400, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In a conversation between me, Milind and Csaba, Milind pointed out
> fadvise(2) [1] and its potential benefits to Glusterfs' caching
> translators like read-ahead etc. After discussing about it, we agreed
> that ou
On 08/11/2017 04:51 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:47:47AM -0400, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
Hi all,
In a conversation between me, Milind and Csaba, Milind pointed out
fadvise(2) [1] and its potential benefits to Glusterfs' caching
translators like read-ahead etc. After d
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 05:50:47PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
>
>
> On 08/11/2017 04:51 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:47:47AM -0400, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > In a conversation between me, Milind and Csaba, Milind pointed out
> > > fadvise(2)
Hi All,
Below are the proposed protocol changes (ie, XDR changes on the wire) we
are thinking for Gluster 4.0.
- rchecksum/fsetattr: Add 'gfid' field on wire
Basic work already done at https://review.gluster.org/#/c/3956/ .
Considering its 5yrs old patch, I refreshed it at
https://review.glu
GlusterFS Coverity covscan results are available from
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/master/glusterfs-coverity/2017-08-11-811c7ba4
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 06:04:36PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Below are the proposed protocol changes (ie, XDR changes on the wire) we
> are thinking for Gluster 4.0.
One of the things that is missing in this list, is to have dictionary
entries have a (key, type, value) format. Thi
