On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:49:38AM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
I addressed the points you raised but now my patch is failing just newly
introduced ./tests/bugs/afr-quota-xattr-mdata-heal.t
(...)
There seems to be one more catch. afr_is_dirtime_splitbrain() only compares
equality of
On 12/18/2014 01:28 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 03:21:24PM -0500, Jeff Darcy wrote:
Is there *any* case, not even necessarily involving conservative merge,
where it would be harmful to propagate the latest ctime/mtime for any
replica of a directory?
In case of
On 12/19/2014 08:23 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Ravishankar N ravishan...@redhat.com wrote:
Point #1 would be addressed by your patch with some modifications (pending
review );
I addressed the points you raised but now my patch is failing just newly
introduced
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 03:21:24PM -0500, Jeff Darcy wrote:
Is there *any* case, not even necessarily involving conservative merge,
where it would be harmful to propagate the latest ctime/mtime for any
replica of a directory?
In case of conservative merge, the problem vanish on its own anyway:
Ravishankar N ravishan...@redhat.com wrote:
The check can be done in metadata selfheal itself but I don't think AFR is
to blame if the user space app in NetBSD sends a setattr on the parent
dir.
It is not exactly the problem: When adding an entry, you must update
parent directory mtime/ctime.
Here is a proposal: we know that at the end of conservative merge, we
should end up with the situation where directory ctime/mtime is the
ctime of the most recently added children.
Won't the directory mtime change as the result of a rename or unlink?
Neither of those would be reflected in the
Seems OK to me, as long as the appropriate locks are taken.
-Krutika
- Original Message -
From: Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org
To: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 8:08:03 PM
Subject: [Gluster-devel] AFR conservative merge portability
*From: *Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org
*To: *Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org
*Sent: *Saturday, December 13, 2014 8:08:03 PM
*Subject: *[Gluster-devel] AFR conservative merge portability
Hello
On NetBSD, tests/basic/afr/entry
