On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Xavier Hernandez
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would need some reviews if you have some time:
>
> A memory leak fix in fuse:
> * Patch already merged in master and 3.10
> * Backport to 3.9: https://review.gluster.org/16402
> * Backport to 3.8: https://re
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Xavier Hernandez
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would need some reviews if you have some time:
>
> A memory leak fix in fuse:
> * Patch already merged in master and 3.10
> * Backport to 3.9: https://review.gluster.org/16402
> * Backport to 3.8: https://re
Hi everyone,
I would need some reviews if you have some time:
A memory leak fix in fuse:
* Patch already merged in master and 3.10
* Backport to 3.9: https://review.gluster.org/16402
* Backport to 3.8: https://review.gluster.org/16403
A safe fallback for dynamic code generation in E
Hi all,
I'd like to point out that there are reviews needed before I will merge
changes in the release-3.5 branch. Many bugs that have been proposed as
a blocker [1] for gluserfs-3.5.3 have patches posted. Bugs that are in
the POST state, should have links to the review request, please have a
look
Hi all,
at least for the stable 3.5 release branch, we need reviewers and
merging of the following patches:
- http://review.gluster.org/7642
glfs_fini: Clean up all the resources allocated in glfs_new
+ blocking bug 1134050
+ backport needed for bug 1134050
- http://review.gluster.org/8064
Hopefully we can get a beta2 for glusterfs-3.5.1 out in the following
days. Most of the outstanding patches have now passed regression testing
and are merged. There are still a few bugs listed as blockers, and their
patches need to be included in the master branch before I'll merge their
counte
