Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.10.11: Planned for the 28th of Feb, 2018

[Atin Mukherjee]

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 7:26 AM, Atin Mukherjee  wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 7:46 PM, Shyam Ranganathan 
> wrote:
>
>> On 01/30/2018 02:14 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > As release 3.10.10 is tagged and off to packaging, here are the needed
>> > details for 3.10.11
>> >
>> > Release date: 28th Feb, 2018
>>
>> Checking the 3.10 review backlog, here are a couple of concerns,
>>
>> 1) Reviews,
>>   - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19081/
>>   - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19082/
>>
>> Have been submitted since Jan 9th, but are not passing regressions or
>> smoke. I rebased them again today, but they still fail.
>>
>> @Du, can you look at these, as you have backported them.
>>
>> 2) @Hari, https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19553/ seems to be failing
>> consistently in the test, ./tests/bugs/posix/bug-990028.t please take a
>> look, as this patch is important from an upgrade perspective.
>>
>
> atin@dhcp35-96:~/codebase/upstream/glusterfs_master/glusterfs$ git log
> tests/bugs/posix/bug-990028.t
> commit 858fae39936e5aee5ea4e3816a10ba310d04cf61
> Author: Amar Tumballi 
> Date:   Mon Nov 27 23:56:50 2017 +0530
>
> tests: mark currently failing regression tests as known issues
>
> Change-Id: If6c36dc6c395730dfb17b5b4df6f24629d904926
> BUG: 1517961
> Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi 
>
> FWIW, this test is marked as bad in master.  Should we mark it bad in
> release-3.12 as well?
>

s/release-3.12/release-3.10/g


>
>
>> > Tracker bug for blockers:
>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.10.11
>> >
>> > Shyam
>> > ___
>> > Gluster-devel mailing list
>> > Gluster-devel@gluster.org
>> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>> >
>> ___
>> maintainers mailing list
>> maintain...@gluster.org
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>
>
>
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.10.11: Planned for the 28th of Feb, 2018

[Atin Mukherjee]

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 7:46 PM, Shyam Ranganathan 
wrote:

> On 01/30/2018 02:14 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As release 3.10.10 is tagged and off to packaging, here are the needed
> > details for 3.10.11
> >
> > Release date: 28th Feb, 2018
>
> Checking the 3.10 review backlog, here are a couple of concerns,
>
> 1) Reviews,
>   - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19081/
>   - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19082/
>
> Have been submitted since Jan 9th, but are not passing regressions or
> smoke. I rebased them again today, but they still fail.
>
> @Du, can you look at these, as you have backported them.
>
> 2) @Hari, https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19553/ seems to be failing
> consistently in the test, ./tests/bugs/posix/bug-990028.t please take a
> look, as this patch is important from an upgrade perspective.
>

atin@dhcp35-96:~/codebase/upstream/glusterfs_master/glusterfs$ git log
tests/bugs/posix/bug-990028.t
commit 858fae39936e5aee5ea4e3816a10ba310d04cf61
Author: Amar Tumballi 
Date:   Mon Nov 27 23:56:50 2017 +0530

tests: mark currently failing regression tests as known issues

Change-Id: If6c36dc6c395730dfb17b5b4df6f24629d904926
BUG: 1517961
Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi 

FWIW, this test is marked as bad in master.  Should we mark it bad in
release-3.12 as well?


> > Tracker bug for blockers:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.10.11
> >
> > Shyam
> > ___
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel@gluster.org
> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
> ___
> maintainers mailing list
> maintain...@gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel