On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <
gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2016-09-22 18:34 GMT+02:00 Amye Scavarda :
> > Nope! RHGS is the supported version and gluster.org is the open source
> > version. We'd like to keep the documentation reflecting that, but good
> > c
2016-09-22 18:34 GMT+02:00 Amye Scavarda :
> Nope! RHGS is the supported version and gluster.org is the open source
> version. We'd like to keep the documentation reflecting that, but good
> catch.
Ok but features should be the same, right?
___
Gluster-d
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <
gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2016-09-22 17:25 GMT+02:00 Rajesh Joseph :
>>
>> I merged our upstream documenation with the Red Hat documentation and
>> removed
>> few Red Hat specific contents.
>>
>> Which content is RH specific?
2016-09-22 17:25 GMT+02:00 Rajesh Joseph :
>
> I merged our upstream documenation with the Red Hat documentation and
> removed
> few Red Hat specific contents.
>
> Which content is RH specific? Aren't gluster and RHGS the same ?
___
Gluster-devel mailing
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Amye Scavarda wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Joe Julian wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 08/23/2016 12:27 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
>>
>>> On 11 Aug 2016, at 21:23, Amye Scavarda wrote:
>>>
The Red Hat Gluster Storage documentation team and I had a conversa
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Joe Julian wrote:
>
>
> On 08/23/2016 12:27 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
>
>> On 11 Aug 2016, at 21:23, Amye Scavarda wrote:
>>
>>> The Red Hat Gluster Storage documentation team and I had a conversation
>>> about how we can our upstream documentation more consistent
On 08/23/2016 12:27 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 11 Aug 2016, at 21:23, Amye Scavarda wrote:
The Red Hat Gluster Storage documentation team and I had a conversation
about how we can our upstream documentation more consistent and improved
for our users, and they're willing to work with us to fin
On 23 Aug 2016, at 20:27, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 11 Aug 2016, at 21:23, Amye Scavarda wrote:
>> The Red Hat Gluster Storage documentation team and I had a conversation
>> about how we can our upstream documentation more consistent and improved
>> for our users, and they're willing to work with
On 11 Aug 2016, at 21:23, Amye Scavarda wrote:
> The Red Hat Gluster Storage documentation team and I had a conversation
> about how we can our upstream documentation more consistent and improved
> for our users, and they're willing to work with us to find where the major
> gaps are in our documen
quot;Prashanth
Pai" mailto:p...@redhat.com>>
> Cc: "Amye Scavarda" mailto:a...@redhat.com>>,
"Gluster Devel" mailto:gluster-devel@gluster.org>>
> Sent: Monday, 15 August, 2016 10:45:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] [gluster-
gt; > Cc: "Amye Scavarda" , "Gluster Devel" <
> gluster-devel@gluster.org>
> > Sent: Monday, 15 August, 2016 10:45:59 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] [gluster-devel] Documentation Tooling Review
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Ni
- Original Message -
> From: "Amye Scavarda"
> To: "Niels de Vos" , "Humble Chirammal"
> , "Prashanth Pai"
> Cc: "Amye Scavarda" , "Gluster Devel"
>
> Sent: Monday, 15 August, 2016 10:45:59 PM
> Subj
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 01:23:43PM -0700, Amye Scavarda wrote:
> > The Red Hat Gluster Storage documentation team and I had a conversation
> > about how we can our upstream documentation more consistent and improved
> > for our users, and th
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <
gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Il 15 ago 2016 18:32, "Amye Scavarda" ha scritto:
> >
> > I'm not sure what you're proposing here?
> >>
>
> I'm proposing to not move current docs from markdown to asciidoc (that
> means to rewrite
Il 15 ago 2016 18:32, "Amye Scavarda" ha scritto:
>
> I'm not sure what you're proposing here?
>>
I'm proposing to not move current docs from markdown to asciidoc (that
means to rewrite everithing) but just change read the docs with something
else
If read the docs is the main issue, just change
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <
gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Il 13 ago 2016 1:18 AM, "Amye Scavarda" ha scritto:
> > Pushing this one higher again to see if anyone has objections to looking
> more into ASCIIdocs.
> > Our RTD search issue is a known issue and
Il 13 ago 2016 1:18 AM, "Amye Scavarda" ha scritto:
> Pushing this one higher again to see if anyone has objections to looking
more into ASCIIdocs.
> Our RTD search issue is a known issue and not likely to be resolved in
the RTD platform.
> - amye
If main issue is the RTD broken search, why rewr
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 01:23:43PM -0700, Amye Scavarda wrote:
> The Red Hat Gluster Storage documentation team and I had a conversation
> about how we can our upstream documentation more consistent and improved
> for our users, and they're willing to work with us to find where the major
> gaps are
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Amye Scavarda wrote:
[snip]
> I'm happy to take comments on this proposal. Over the next week, I'll be
> reviewing the level of effort it would take to migrate to ASCIIdocs and
> ASCIIbinder, with the goal being to have this in place by end of September.
This is
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote:
> The Red Hat Gluster Storage documentation team and I had a conversation
> about how we can our upstream documentation more consistent and improved
> for our users, and they're willing to work with us to find where the major
> gaps are in our
20 matches
Mail list logo
