Re: [Gluster-devel] Master branch lock down status (Fri, August 9th)
On 08/10/2018 09:59 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Today's patch set is 9 [1]. > > Total of 7 runs for line-coverage, mux regressions, centos7 regressions > are running (some are yet to complete). > > Test failure summary is as follows, Updating this section 1. ./tests/bugs/glusterd/validating-server-quorum.t (3 cores, 1 retry) 2. ./tests/bugs/core/multiplex-limit-issue-151.t (1 failure, 1 retry) 3. ./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1482023-snpashot-issue-with-other-processes-accessing-mounted-path.t (2 retries) 4. (NEW) ./tests/basic/afr/replace-brick-self-heal.t (1 retry) 5. ./tests/bugs/glusterd/quorum-validation.t (2 retires, 1 core) 6. (NEW) ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1408712.t (1 retry) (ravi looking at it) 7. replace-brick-self-heal.t (1 retry) 8. ./tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t (1 retry) > > Test output can be found at, [2] and [3]. [2] will be updated as runs > that are still ongoing complete. Above is also updated to find the runs where the tests fail. > > Shyam > [1] Patch set: https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20637/9 > [2] Sheet recording failures: > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IF9GhpKah4bto19RQLr0y_Kkw26E_-crKALHSaSjZMQ/edit#gid=1535799585 > [3] Comment on patch set 9 recording runs till now: > https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20637#message-07f3886dda133ed642438eb9e82b82d957668e86 > On 08/07/2018 07:37 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> Deserves a new beginning, threads on the other mail have gone deep enough. >> >> NOTE: (5) below needs your attention, rest is just process and data on >> how to find failures. >> >> 1) We are running the tests using the patch [2]. >> >> 2) Run details are extracted into a separate sheet in [3] named "Run >> Failures" use a search to find a failing test and the corresponding run >> that it failed in. >> >> 3) Patches that are fixing issues can be found here [1], if you think >> you have a patch out there, that is not in this list, shout out. >> >> 4) If you own up a test case failure, update the spreadsheet [3] with >> your name against the test, and also update other details as needed (as >> comments, as edit rights to the sheet are restricted). >> >> 5) Current test failures >> We still have the following tests failing and some without any RCA or >> attention, (If something is incorrect, write back). >> >> ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1290965-detect-bitrotten-objects.t (needs >> attention) >> ./tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-tarssh.t (Kotresh) >> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/add-brick-and-validate-replicated-volume-options.t >> (Atin) >> ./tests/bugs/ec/bug-1236065.t (Ashish) >> ./tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t (Kotresh) >> ./tests/basic/ec/ec-1468261.t (needs attention) >> ./tests/basic/afr/add-brick-self-heal.t (needs attention) >> ./tests/basic/afr/granular-esh/replace-brick.t (needs attention) >> ./tests/bugs/core/multiplex-limit-issue-151.t (needs attention) >> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/validating-server-quorum.t (Atin) >> ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1363721.t (Ravi) >> >> Here are some newer failures, but mostly one-off failures except cores >> in ec-5-2.t. All of the following need attention as these are new. >> >> ./tests/00-geo-rep/00-georep-verify-setup.t >> ./tests/basic/afr/gfid-mismatch-resolution-with-fav-child-policy.t >> ./tests/basic/stats-dump.t >> ./tests/bugs/bug-1110262.t >> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/mgmt-handshake-and-volume-sync-post-glusterd-restart.t >> ./tests/basic/ec/ec-data-heal.t >> ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1448804-check-quorum-type-values.t >> ./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1482023-snpashot-issue-with-other-processes-accessing-mounted-path.t >> ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-2.t >> >> 6) Tests that are addressed or are not occurring anymore are, >> >> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/rebalance-operations-in-single-node.t >> ./tests/bugs/index/bug-1559004-EMLINK-handling.t >> ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1386188-sbrain-fav-child.t >> ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1433571-undo-pending-only-on-up-bricks.t >> ./tests/bitrot/bug-1373520.t >> ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1117851.t >> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/quorum-validation.t >> ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1042725.t >> ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1586020-mark-dirty-for-entry-txn-on-quorum-failure.t >> ./tests/bugs/quota/bug-1293601.t >> ./tests/bugs/bug-1368312.t >> ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t >> ./tests/bugs/core/bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t >> >> Shyam (and Atin) >> >> On 08/05/2018 06:24 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>> Health on master as of the last nightly run [4] is still the same. >>> >>> Potential patches that rectify the situation (as in [1]) are bunched in >>> a patch [2] that Atin and myself have put through several regressions >>> (mux, normal and line coverage) and these have also not passed. >>> >>> Till we rectify the situation we are locking down master branch commit >>> rights to the following people, Amar, Atin, Shyam, Vijay. >>> >>> The intention is to stabilize master and not add more patches that my >>> destabilize it. >>> >>> Test cases that are track
Re: [Gluster-devel] Master branch lock down status (Fri, August 9th)
On 08/11/2018 07:29 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1408712.t (one retry) I'll take a look at this. But it looks like archiving the artifacts (logs) for this run (https://build.gluster.org/job/regression-on-demand-full-run/44/consoleFull) was a failure. Thanks, Ravi ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] Master branch lock down status (Fri, August 9th)
Today's patch set is 9 [1]. Total of 7 runs for line-coverage, mux regressions, centos7 regressions are running (some are yet to complete). Test failure summary is as follows, ./tests/bugs/glusterd/validating-server-quorum.t (2 cores) ./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1482023-snpashot-issue-with-other-processes-accessing-mounted-path.t (2 retries) ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1408712.t (one retry) ./tests/bugs/core/multiplex-limit-issue-151.t (one retry) ./tests/bugs/quick-read/bug-846240.t (one retry) ./tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t (one retry) Test output can be found at, [2] and [3]. [2] will be updated as runs that are still ongoing complete. Shyam [1] Patch set: https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20637/9 [2] Sheet recording failures: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IF9GhpKah4bto19RQLr0y_Kkw26E_-crKALHSaSjZMQ/edit#gid=1535799585 [3] Comment on patch set 9 recording runs till now: https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20637#message-07f3886dda133ed642438eb9e82b82d957668e86 On 08/07/2018 07:37 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Deserves a new beginning, threads on the other mail have gone deep enough. > > NOTE: (5) below needs your attention, rest is just process and data on > how to find failures. > > 1) We are running the tests using the patch [2]. > > 2) Run details are extracted into a separate sheet in [3] named "Run > Failures" use a search to find a failing test and the corresponding run > that it failed in. > > 3) Patches that are fixing issues can be found here [1], if you think > you have a patch out there, that is not in this list, shout out. > > 4) If you own up a test case failure, update the spreadsheet [3] with > your name against the test, and also update other details as needed (as > comments, as edit rights to the sheet are restricted). > > 5) Current test failures > We still have the following tests failing and some without any RCA or > attention, (If something is incorrect, write back). > > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1290965-detect-bitrotten-objects.t (needs > attention) > ./tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-tarssh.t (Kotresh) > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/add-brick-and-validate-replicated-volume-options.t > (Atin) > ./tests/bugs/ec/bug-1236065.t (Ashish) > ./tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t (Kotresh) > ./tests/basic/ec/ec-1468261.t (needs attention) > ./tests/basic/afr/add-brick-self-heal.t (needs attention) > ./tests/basic/afr/granular-esh/replace-brick.t (needs attention) > ./tests/bugs/core/multiplex-limit-issue-151.t (needs attention) > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/validating-server-quorum.t (Atin) > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1363721.t (Ravi) > > Here are some newer failures, but mostly one-off failures except cores > in ec-5-2.t. All of the following need attention as these are new. > > ./tests/00-geo-rep/00-georep-verify-setup.t > ./tests/basic/afr/gfid-mismatch-resolution-with-fav-child-policy.t > ./tests/basic/stats-dump.t > ./tests/bugs/bug-1110262.t > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/mgmt-handshake-and-volume-sync-post-glusterd-restart.t > ./tests/basic/ec/ec-data-heal.t > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1448804-check-quorum-type-values.t > ./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1482023-snpashot-issue-with-other-processes-accessing-mounted-path.t > ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-2.t > > 6) Tests that are addressed or are not occurring anymore are, > > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/rebalance-operations-in-single-node.t > ./tests/bugs/index/bug-1559004-EMLINK-handling.t > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1386188-sbrain-fav-child.t > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1433571-undo-pending-only-on-up-bricks.t > ./tests/bitrot/bug-1373520.t > ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1117851.t > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/quorum-validation.t > ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1042725.t > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1586020-mark-dirty-for-entry-txn-on-quorum-failure.t > ./tests/bugs/quota/bug-1293601.t > ./tests/bugs/bug-1368312.t > ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t > ./tests/bugs/core/bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t > > Shyam (and Atin) > > On 08/05/2018 06:24 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> Health on master as of the last nightly run [4] is still the same. >> >> Potential patches that rectify the situation (as in [1]) are bunched in >> a patch [2] that Atin and myself have put through several regressions >> (mux, normal and line coverage) and these have also not passed. >> >> Till we rectify the situation we are locking down master branch commit >> rights to the following people, Amar, Atin, Shyam, Vijay. >> >> The intention is to stabilize master and not add more patches that my >> destabilize it. >> >> Test cases that are tracked as failures and need action are present here >> [3]. >> >> @Nigel, request you to apply the commit rights change as you see this >> mail and let the list know regarding the same as well. >> >> Thanks, >> Shyam >> >> [1] Patches that address regression failures: >> https://review.gluster.org/#/q/starredby:srangana%2540redhat.com >> >> [2] Bunched up patch against which regressions were run: >> https://revi
