Re: [Gluster-devel] ec spurious regression failures

2015-05-05 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org wrote: I sent http://review.gluster.org/10540 to address it completely. Not sure if it works on netBSD. Emmanuel help!! I launched test runs in a loop on nbslave70. More later. Failed on first pass: Test Summary Report ---

Re: [Gluster-devel] ec spurious regression failures

2015-05-05 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On 05/05/2015 01:35 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 05/05/2015 11:40 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org wrote: I sent http://review.gluster.org/10540 to address it completely. Not sure if it works on netBSD. Emmanuel help!! I launched test runs in a loop on nbslave70.

Re: [Gluster-devel] ec spurious regression failures

2015-05-05 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 05/05/2015 11:40 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org wrote: I sent http://review.gluster.org/10540 to address it completely. Not sure if it works on netBSD. Emmanuel help!! I launched test runs in a loop on nbslave70. More later. Failed on first pass: Test

Re: [Gluster-devel] ec spurious regression failures

2015-05-05 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On 05/05/2015 01:54 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 01:45:03PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: Already updated the status about this in the earlier mail. http://review.gluster.org/10539 is the fix. That one only touches bug-1202244-support-inode-quota.t ... RCA:

Re: [Gluster-devel] ec spurious regression failures

2015-05-04 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On 05/05/2015 08:39 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: Vijai/Sachin, Did you get a chance to work on this? http://review.gluster.com/10166 failed Just now again in ec because http://review.gluster.org/10069 is merged yesterday which can lead to same problem. I sent

Re: [Gluster-devel] ec spurious regression failures

2015-05-04 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
Vijai/Sachin, Did you get a chance to work on this? http://review.gluster.com/10166 failed Just now again in ec because http://review.gluster.org/10069 is merged yesterday which can lead to same problem. I sent http://review.gluster.org/10539 to address the issue for now. Please look