On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:02 AM, riya khanna
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:42 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa > wrote:
>
>> +Manoj.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:18 PM, riya khanna
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I'm
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:42 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
wrote:
> +Manoj.
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:18 PM, riya khanna
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm trying to use the new framework to speed up lookups/attr/xattr
>> operations by split
+Manoj.
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:18 PM, riya khanna
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to use the new framework to speed up lookups/attr/xattr
> operations by split functionality between fast/slow execution paths. I'd
> highly appreciate if you could suggest experiments
Hi All,
I'm trying to use the new framework to speed up lookups/attr/xattr
operations by split functionality between fast/slow execution paths. I'd
highly appreciate if you could suggest experiments to evaluate the
performance improvement.
As I mentioned in my previous email, I'm caching replies
Thanks Amar! Please see my answers inline.
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 5:41 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote:
> Hi Riya,
>
> Thanks for writing to us. Some questions before we start on this.
>
> * Where can we see your work of modifying the fuse module to cache the
> calls? Some
Hi Riya,
Thanks for writing to us. Some questions before we start on this.
* Where can we see your work of modifying the fuse module to cache the
calls? Some reference would help us to provide more specific pointers. (or
ask better questions).
* If the caching happened in fuse module, and it