Clift jus...@gluster.org
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 10:58:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] spurious regression failures again!
Hi Avra,
Just clarifying things here,
1) When testing with the setup provide by Justin, I found the only place
where bug-1112559.t failed was after
On 07/22/2014 07:19 AM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
Could this be a time to propose that gluster understands port reservation a'la
systemd (LISTEN_FDS),
and make the test harness make sure that random ports do not collide with the
set of expected ports,
which will be beneficial when starting from
On 2014-07-22 16:44, Justin Clift wrote:
On 22/07/2014, at 3:28 PM, Joe Julian wrote:
On 07/22/2014 07:19 AM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
Could this be a time to propose that gluster understands port reservation
a'la systemd (LISTEN_FDS),
and make the test harness make sure that random ports do
Hi,
Created a bug against the same. Please use it to submit if required.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121014
Thanks
Varun Shastry
On Tuesday 15 July 2014 09:34 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/15/2014 09:24 PM, Joseph Fernandes wrote:
Hi Pranith,
Could you please
: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org, Varun Shastry
vshas...@redhat.com, Justin Clift jus...@gluster.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 1:03:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] spurious regression failures again!
Joseph,
I am not sure I understand how this is affecting the spurious failure
Hi Pranith,
Could you please share the link of the console output of the failures.
Regards,
Joe
- Original Message -
From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com
To: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org, Varun Shastry
vshas...@redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 8:52:44 PM
