-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/05/2015 06:54 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le lundi 29 juin 2015 à 18:48 -0400, Kaleb Keithley a écrit :
From: Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 02:45:50PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
wrote:
On 06/29/2015 02:40 PM,
Le lundi 29 juin 2015 à 18:48 -0400, Kaleb Keithley a écrit :
From: Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 02:45:50PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
On 06/29/2015 02:40 PM, Anoop C S wrote:
Niels and I had a brief chat a while back about adding a Fedora
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Fernandes josfe...@redhat.com
Agree with Jeff
But now the question is should we have this patch go through or leave it to
float in time and space :)
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11214/
The patch just makes the existing inline calls static or
Or perhaps we could just get everyone to stop using 'inline'
I agree that it would be a good thing to reduce/modify our use of
'inline' significantly. Any advantage gained from avoiding normal
function-all entry/exit has to be weighed against cache pollution from
having the same code repeated
Agree with Jeff
But now the question is should we have this patch go through or leave it to
float in time and space :)
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11214/
The patch just makes the existing inline calls static or extern appropriately
without causing any harm to the existing
code but removes the
-devel] Gluster and GCC 5.1
From: Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 02:45:50PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
On 06/29/2015 02:40 PM, Anoop C S wrote:
Niels and I had a brief chat a while back about adding a Fedora 22 VM to
Jenkins to catch these. I don't
On 06/29/2015 02:45 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
E.g. by building on Fedora Rawhide last year, reporting the bugs,
and getting them fixed before Rawhide turned into Fedora 22.
Immediately after the Fedora 22 release, we had a similar issue
reported from a user with gcc v5 and was fixed
From: Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 02:45:50PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
On 06/29/2015 02:40 PM, Anoop C S wrote:
Niels and I had a brief chat a while back about adding a Fedora 22 VM to
Jenkins to catch these. I don't think anything ever happened
