Re: [Gluster-infra] [Bug 1418369] Need way to revert commits or mark tests bad without testing

[Niels de Vos]

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 05:46:53AM +, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418369
> 
> Nigel Babu  changed:
> 
>What|Removed |Added
> 
>  Status|NEW |CLOSED
>  CC||j...@pl.atyp.us,
>||nig...@redhat.com
>  Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
> Last Closed||2017-04-17 01:46:53
> 
> 
> 
> --- Comment #3 from Nigel Babu  ---
> The technical capability is now done. There's a team called gluster-plumbers
> who have permission to push to any branch directly. It has Vijay, Jeff, and
> Shyam. As far as infra is concerned this is fixed. If the policy dictates
> changes to this, please file a bug.

Just wondering if we should have a "plumber" role in the Maintainers 2.0
document too?

Thanks,
Niels


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1418369] Need way to revert commits or mark tests bad without testing

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418369

Nigel Babu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||j...@pl.atyp.us,
   ||nig...@redhat.com
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2017-04-17 01:46:53



--- Comment #3 from Nigel Babu  ---
The technical capability is now done. There's a team called gluster-plumbers
who have permission to push to any branch directly. It has Vijay, Jeff, and
Shyam. As far as infra is concerned this is fixed. If the policy dictates
changes to this, please file a bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=C9eRW4xHB4=cc_unsubscribe
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1418369] Need way to revert commits or mark tests bad without testing

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418369

Jeff Darcy  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(jda...@redhat.com |
   |)   |



--- Comment #2 from Jeff Darcy  ---
Yes, there should be a policy discussion about this, but it's moot if the
technical capability isn't implemented.  Therefore, I think the two efforts can
proceed in parallel.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LlJ4fflIM8=cc_unsubscribe
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1418369] Need way to revert commits or mark tests bad without testing

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418369

Niels de Vos  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||Triaged
 CC||jda...@redhat.com,
   ||nde...@redhat.com
  Flags||needinfo?(jda...@redhat.com
   ||)



--- Comment #1 from Niels de Vos  ---
Should we not have a discussion or at least a notification about this on the
maintainers list? I think permissions to push changes without reviews can be
done by release managers (because they need to be able to push tags?), but
fine-tuning the permissions sounds like a good idea.

Just some guidelines or recommendations on which changes to push and 'rules' to
notify relevant persons and track progress would be good.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6wF1TJLRhk=cc_unsubscribe
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra