On 06/29/2015 02:40 PM, Anoop C S wrote:
>
>
> On 06/29/2015 11:56 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>> On 06/29/2015 02:04 PM, Anoop C S wrote:
>>>
>>> Reading through gcc docs I could see that with gcc v5, it
>>> defaults to C99 semantics and compiling with
On 06/29/2015 02:45 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>>
>>> E.g. by building on Fedora Rawhide last year, reporting the bugs,
>>> and getting them fixed before Rawhide turned into Fedora 22.
>>
>>
>> Immediately after the Fedora 22 release, we had a similar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/05/2015 06:54 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le lundi 29 juin 2015 à 18:48 -0400, Kaleb Keithley a écrit :
>>
>>
>>> From: "Niels de Vos"
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 02:45:50PM -0400, K
The NFS-ganesha project is looking for somewhere to host their mailing
lists after SourceForge's most recent meltdown.
Could we — would we be willing to — host their lists? (All two of them I
think. Probably with a few dozen subscribers at most I'm guessing.)
--
Kaleb
On 09/09/2015 01:27 PM, Joe Julian wrote:
> http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/CentOS/glusterfs-epel.repo
> is broken. Should CentOS be a symlink to EPEL.repo?
>
> Michael, is that handled in salt or is it a manual thing?
It's manual. Whatever stuckee^h^h^h^h^h^h^hvolunteer
Hi,
I thought I had privs to do this myself, but I'm not seeing how to do it
atm.
Please add Manikandan (Manikandan-Selvaganesh) to glusterfs-debian team
members. Maybe add him to GlusterFS team too?
Thanks
--
Kaleb
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
On 02/16/2016 04:47 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le lundi 15 février 2016 à 17:11 +0100, Michael Scherer a écrit :
>> Le lundi 15 février 2016 à 17:07 +0100, Michael Scherer a écrit :
>>> Le lundi 15 février 2016 à 08:03 -0500, Kaleb Keithley a écrit :
Hi,
e.g.
...
X-
On 06/28/2016 08:07 PM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
>
> I have a follow-up question on the production of these artifacts -
> when do we check whether the RPMs or, the images produced are sane?
> For example, that the RPMs are packaged well and as per specifications
> ...
>
For Fedora/RHEL/Cen
On 09/02/2016 06:36 AM, Nigel Babu wrote:
>
> Here's the flow as I see it:
> 1. Propose a review request.
> 2. Smoke tests run as soon as a patchset is created or updated.
> 3. Reviewer gives +2.
> 4. Zuul will run regressions in the order than patches received Code Review
> +2.
>If they pass
On 02/21/2017 10:40 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Hi,
I am pondering on putting the result of coverty scan on a separate
website than download.gluster.org, or if possible, on a separate vhost.
I did deploy today a server that verify the integrity of
download.gluster.org, and I realize that since w
On 03/24/2017 09:39 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 05:29:05PM -0400, Michael Scherer wrote:
>> Another example:
>> pub/gluster/glusterfs has various directory for versions of glusterfs,
>> but also do have libvirt, vagrant and nfs-ganesha, who are not version,
>> and might be rat
On 04/20/2017 08:17 AM, Shyam wrote:
On 04/20/2017 01:27 AM, Nigel Babu wrote:
Hello folks,
As I was testing the Jenkins upgrade, I realized we store quite a lot
of old
builds on Jenkins that doesn't seem to be useful. I'm going to start
cleaning
them slowly in anticipation of moving Jenkins ov
We don't do 3.X.y versions in bugzilla any more.
Just 3.8, 3.10, 3.11, and mainline.
On 05/15/2017 02:56 AM, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/14/2017 04:02 PM, Raghavendra
https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/glusterfs-3.13.1.tar.gz
Check with NigelB about the copy to bits.gluster.org
On 12/21/2017 05:07 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 02:07:50AM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote:
SRC:
https://build.gluste
FYI
At around 13:00 EST Reiner030 reported in #gluster that
download.gluster.org had been rejecting http requests for at least 30
minutes.
I signed on and saw that $subject was getting I/O errors. I unmounted
(remounted to replay the journal and unmounted again.) I ran xfs_repair,
then remounted.
On 03/15/2018 04:53 AM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> Hi Kaleb,
>
> Do you know what's going wrong with Coverity jobs?
disk filled up due to a bug in clang-analyze script. Nobody noticed that
that's been broken for even longer. :-(
bug fixed, disk cleaned up, coverity runs corrected.
Are we getting close
16 matches
Mail list logo
