Makes sense.
Yes I am running the same program.
I will be running couple of more tests to verify this.
BTW. two more questions on the related topics:
1. How much of performance boost does booster provide?
2. does the following
Sudipto Mukhopadhyay wrote:
Makes sense.
Yes I am running the same program.
I will be running couple of more tests to verify this.
BTW. two more questions on the related topics:
1. How much of performance boost does booster provide?
That it provides a performance boost is evident from
This could be tricky as you don't want too lookup too many
alternatives!!
But, as you are doing LD_PRELOAD, can you not ask the application to
specify the paths (I know it's going to be little error prone based on
what application supplies)
For example:
/mnt/glusterfs
If the application run
Sudipto Mukhopadhyay wrote:
This could be tricky as you don't want too lookup too many
alternatives!!
But, as you are doing LD_PRELOAD, can you not ask the application to
specify the paths (I know it's going to be little error prone based on
what application supplies)
For example:
I have a 4 node cluster in test production and this is quite the problem.
Linux Fedora 10/11 client Fuse 2.74 Gluster 2.0.3
Gentoo 2.6.27-gentoo-r8 server Gluster 2.0.3
When mounted native the filesystem does not complete the writing of
Point Cloud files. When mounted via CIFS (glusterfs
Hi,
I'm setting up gluster to share /usr/local among 24 compute nodes. The
basic goal is to be able to change files in /usr/local in one place, and
have it replicate out to all the other nodes.
What I'd like to avoid is having a single point of failure where one (or
several) nodes go down
