Re: [Gluster-users] ERROR in glusterfs2.0.4 using afr+dht

2009-08-19 Thread Vikas Gorur
- eagleeyes eaglee...@126.com wrote: HI all: My glusterfs storage was using for xen images , which configure afr+dht ,but had some error Thanks for reporting this crash. This has been fixed in release-2.0 by: commit f4513b4de104f1c6f40f7bbe0a4bd698340db805 Author: Anand Avati

[Gluster-users] ERROR in glusterfs2.0.6 using afr+dht+quota

2009-08-19 Thread eagleeyes
HI all: I met some error in glusterfs2.0.6 [2009-08-19 15:56:54] E [dht-common.c:1573 ht_setxattr] dht: invalid argument: loc-inode [2009-08-19 15:56:54] C [quota.c:794:quota_setxattr_cbk] quota: failed to set the disk-usage value: Invalid argument client config is volume dht

Re: [Gluster-users] ERROR in glusterfs2.0.4 using afr+dht

2009-08-19 Thread eagleeyes
Thanks , Did it patch into 2.0.6? When the 2.1 version could be released? I hope it into using very much 2009-08-19 eagleeyes 发件人: Vikas Gorur 发送时间: 2009-08-19 16:04:09 收件人: eagleeyes 抄送: gluster-users; Anand Babu 主题: Re: [Gluster-users] ERROR

Re: [Gluster-users] 2.0.6

2009-08-19 Thread Stephan von Krawczynski
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:41:05 +0530 Vijay Bellur vi...@gluster.com wrote: Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:01:46 +0200 And, I forgot to mention: it took me around 1 hour of bonnie to crash a server in a classical distribute setup... This is new to us. We

Re: [Gluster-users] 2.0.6

2009-08-19 Thread Greg
Stephan wrote : Please stop featurism and start reliability. just a +1. I'm also agree with Steve flames... but reliability is really the thing were Gluster Teams must work on. Any comparatives will complain about that and prefer NFS or anything ... About 1 thread of 3 are complaining

Re: [Gluster-users] 2.0.6

2009-08-19 Thread Anand Avati
we tried to reproduce the freeze, but instead a classical hang showed up. This one is nice as everything seems fine with the boxes, only glusterfs mountpoints hang on both clients. There are no unusual outputs in the standard glusterfs logfiles, so we can only show you this: These are

Re: [Gluster-users] 2.0.6

2009-08-19 Thread John Leach
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:22 +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:01:46 +0200 And, I forgot to mention: it took me around 1 hour of bonnie to crash a server in a classical distribute setup... Please stop featurism and start reliability. Hi Stephan, I just reviewed the

Re: [Gluster-users] Interesting experiment

2009-08-19 Thread Hiren Joshi
-Original Message- From: Liam Slusser [mailto:lslus...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 August 2009 18:51 To: Hiren Joshi Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Interesting experiment On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Hiren Joshij...@moonfruit.com wrote: Hi, Ok,

Re: [Gluster-users] Interesting experiment

2009-08-19 Thread Mickey Mazarick
Just a note we initially tried to set up our storage network with bonded 4 port gig E connections per client and storage node and it was still ~1/3 the speed of infiniband. There also appears to be more overhead in unwrapping data from packets even with jumbo frames set. We did see about a

[Gluster-users] Update on internal development

2009-08-19 Thread Anand Babu Periasamy
John Leach wrote: On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:22 +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:01:46 +0200 And, I forgot to mention: it took me around 1 hour of bonnie to crash a server in a classical distribute setup... Please stop featurism and start reliability. Hi Stephan,