Re: [Gluster-users] Problem with services glusterd

2012-02-23 Thread Cesar Miguel Fuentes
Hola Luis hablo Español, que alegría me das de verdad, lo que no hablo o hablo muy mal es el Ingles ggg Un saludo César From: Luis Cerezo [mailto:l...@luiscerezo.org] Sent: dinsdag 21 februari 2012 13:32 To: Cesar Miguel Fuentes Cc: 'gluster-users@gluster.org' Subject: Re: [Gluster-users]

[Gluster-users] help for different uid gid

2012-02-23 Thread Az
Hi，all I have serval several servers , they all have a user “a” ,I try to mount glusterfs client on them, but user “a” on two of them has different uid gid with others, So ,mount cause different permission. I saw there was a solution: features/filter: * root-squashing

Re: [Gluster-users] What about ZFS ?

2012-02-23 Thread Di Pe
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Lars Erik Dangvard Jensen l...@dcmediahosting.com wrote: Den 22/02/2012 kl. 16.46 skrev Dipeit: we have this running with zfsonlinux and glusterfs 3.2.5 and are using a 60TB volume across 3 storage server. In the last 6 months we had one unexplained reboot

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster on powerpc platform

2012-02-23 Thread Deepak C Shetty
On 02/23/2012 03:17 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 02/23/2012 11:01 AM, Deepak C Shetty wrote: Is gluster supported/tested or tried on powerpc platform ? Are there rpms available for the same ? Gluster is not supported on powerpc platform. There have been community testing and trial reports on

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster on powerpc platform

2012-02-23 Thread Deepak C Shetty
On 02/23/2012 04:10 PM, Fabricio wrote: On 23-02-2012 07:47, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 02/23/2012 11:01 AM, Deepak C Shetty wrote: Is gluster supported/tested or tried on powerpc platform ? Are there rpms available for the same ? Gluster is not supported on powerpc platform. There have been

Re: [Gluster-users] What about ZFS ?

2012-02-23 Thread Di Pe
I should add that if you really want great performance (random, metadata, throughput) you may want to use this http://www.fhgfs.com/ We installed it next to the gluster folder on our zfs volumes. fhgfs has better performance than gluster but backup and DR is much more difficult. However they run

Re: [Gluster-users] mismatching layouts errors after expanding volume

2012-02-23 Thread Dan Bretherton
Thanks Jeff, that's interesting. It is reassuring to know that these errors are self repairing. That does appear to be happening, but only when I run find -print0 | xargs --null stat /dev/null in affected directories. I will run that self-heal on the whole volume as well, but I have had to

Re: [Gluster-users] mismatching layouts errors after expanding volume

2012-02-23 Thread Jeff Darcy
On 02/23/2012 08:58 AM, Dan Bretherton wrote: It is reassuring to know that these errors are self repairing. That does appear to be happening, but only when I run find -print0 | xargs --null stat /dev/null in affected directories. Hm. Then maybe the xattrs weren't *set* on that brick. I

Re: [Gluster-users] mismatching layouts errors after expanding volume

2012-02-23 Thread Dan Bretherton
Jeff, The main question is therefore why we're losing connectivity to these servers. Could there be a hardware issue? I have replaced the network cables for the two servers but I don't really know what else to check. The network switch hasn't recorded any errors for those two ports. There

Re: [Gluster-users] mismatching layouts errors after expanding volume

2012-02-23 Thread Jeff Darcy
On 02/23/2012 11:45 AM, Dan Bretherton wrote: The main question is therefore why we're losing connectivity to these servers. Could there be a hardware issue? I have replaced the network cables for the two servers but I don't really know what else to check. The network switch hasn't

Re: [Gluster-users] volume set help-xml libxml problem anyone?

2012-02-23 Thread Carl Boberg
(Sorry, made my answer Rahul directly and not to the list) I have the rpm version installed on my test cluster at the moment Got theese libxml2 packages installed libxml2-static-2.7.6-4.el6_2.4.x86_64 libxml2-python-2.7.6-4.el6_2.4.x86_64 libxml2-2.7.6-4.el6_2.4.i686

[Gluster-users] Help with some socket related logwarnings

2012-02-23 Thread Carl Boberg
Hello I have just started to prepare a smallish production setup (nothing critical running on it yet). I have 2 gluster servers with 8 volumes and Im getting a lot of theese warnings in the cli.log [2012-02-23 22:32:15.808271] W [rpc-transport.c:606:rpc_transport_load] 0-rpc-transport: missing

[Gluster-users] default cluster.stripe-block-size for striped volumes on 3.0.x vs 3.3 beta (128kb), performance change if i reduce to a smaller block size?

2012-02-23 Thread Sabuj Pattanayek
Hi, I've been migrating data from an old striped 3.0.x gluster install to a 3.3 beta install. I copied all the data to a regular XFS partition (4K blocksize) from the old gluster striped volume and it totaled 9.2TB. With the old setup I used the following option in a volume stripe block in the

Re: [Gluster-users] default cluster.stripe-block-size for striped volumes on 3.0.x vs 3.3 beta (128kb), performance change if i reduce to a smaller block size?

2012-02-23 Thread Sabuj Pattanayek
This seems to be a bug in XFS as Joe pointed out : http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2011-06/msg00233.html http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6940516/create-sparse-file-with-alternate-data-and-hole-on-ext3-and-xfs It seems to be there in XFS available natively in RHEL6 and RHEL5 On Thu, Feb 23,

Re: [Gluster-users] default cluster.stripe-block-size for striped volumes on 3.0.x vs 3.3 beta (128kb), performance change if i reduce to a smaller block size?

2012-02-23 Thread Sabuj Pattanayek
Well, I'm still getting weird results with ext4 : gluster1:/pirstripe34T 88G 34T 1% /pirstripe gluster1:/pirdist 34T 88G 34T 1% /pirdist [root@gluster1 ~]# du -sh /pirstripe /pirdist 10G /pirstripe 38G /pirdist 10 * 5 + 38 = 88, but not 10 + 38 On Fri, Feb 24,