Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs process eats memory until OOM kills it

2012-07-19 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 07/19/2012 01:46 AM, Andreas Kurz wrote: Hi, I'm running GlusterFS 3.2.6 in AWS on CentOS 6.2, running a distributed/replicated setup. Type: Distributed-Replicate Status: Started Number of Bricks: 4 x 2 = 8 Whenever geo-replication is activated, the corresponding glusterfs process on the

Re: [Gluster-users] NFS subdirectory Solaris client

2012-07-19 Thread anthony garnier
Hi Shishir, I have reconfigured the port to 2049 so there is no need to specify it. Moreover the mount of the volume works fine, it's only the mount of the subdirectory that doesn't work. Thx and Regards, Anthony Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 22:54:28 -0400 From: sgo...@redhat.com To:

Re: [Gluster-users] NFS performance degradation in 3.3

2012-07-19 Thread samuel
I've just make more tests and without any error log, the NFS glusterfs server raised up to 6.00 load (in a 4 core server) and in the 2 bricks where the real files where stored, reached loads of 10. No error message in log files (nfs, bricks, gluster). Will deactivate NLM improve performance? Any

Re: [Gluster-users] NFS subdirectory Solaris client

2012-07-19 Thread Rajesh Amaravathi
Hi Anthony, sub directory mount is not possible with GlusterNfs in 3.2.x version. you can get the 3.3 gNfs to work for subdir mount on solaris, though it requires some oblique steps to get it working. The steps are provided in the documentation (Admin guide i think) for 3.3. Regards,

Re: [Gluster-users] NFS subdirectory Solaris client

2012-07-19 Thread anthony garnier
Hi Rajesh , My mistake, I didn't specify that I was in 3.3. I didn't see any particular comment in the Admin doc about subdirectory export. Are you referring to this option: nfs.export-dir, but by default every subdirectory are exported. Regards, Anthony Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 04:42:20

Re: [Gluster-users] Granular locking - does this need to be enabled in 3.3.0 ?

2012-07-19 Thread Jake Grimmett
Dear Pranith /Anand , Update on our progress with using KVM Gluster: We built a two server (Dell R710) cluster, each box has... 5 x 500 GB SATA RAID5 array (software raid) an Intel 10GB ethernet HBA. One box has 8GB RAM, the other 48GB both have 2 x E5520 Xeon Centos 6.3 installed

Re: [Gluster-users] NFS subdirectory Solaris client

2012-07-19 Thread anthony garnier
Hi Rajesh, Thank you for the workaround, it works fine. Can we expect a patch in the future release to avoid this procedure ? Regards, Anthony Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 05:30:24 -0400 From: raj...@redhat.com To: sokar6...@hotmail.com CC: gluster-users@gluster.org; sgo...@redhat.com Subject:

Re: [Gluster-users] NFS mounts with glusterd on localhost - reliable or not?

2012-07-19 Thread Whit Blauvelt
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 01:56:04AM -0400, Rajesh Amaravathi wrote: As to whether we can disable parts of kernel NFS (I'm assuming e.g NLM), I think its not really necessary since we can mount other exports with nolock option. If we take out NLM or disable NLM at the kernel level, then every

Re: [Gluster-users] NFS mounts with glusterd on localhost - reliable or not?

2012-07-19 Thread Whit Blauvelt
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:16:24AM -0400, Krishna Srinivas wrote: It was pretty confusing to read this thread. Hope I can clarify the questions here. Thanks. I was confused. The other discussion in this thread was related to NLM which has been implemented in 3.3.0. This is to support locking

Re: [Gluster-users] Granular locking - does this need to be enabled in 3.3.0 ?

2012-07-19 Thread Anand Avati
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Jake Grimmett j...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.ukwrote: Dear Pranith /Anand , Update on our progress with using KVM Gluster: We built a two server (Dell R710) cluster, each box has... 5 x 500 GB SATA RAID5 array (software raid) an Intel 10GB ethernet HBA. One box

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs process eats memory until OOM kills it

2012-07-19 Thread Andreas Kurz
On 07/19/2012 08:57 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 07/19/2012 01:46 AM, Andreas Kurz wrote: Hi, I'm running GlusterFS 3.2.6 in AWS on CentOS 6.2, running a distributed/replicated setup. Type: Distributed-Replicate Status: Started Number of Bricks: 4 x 2 = 8 Whenever geo-replication is

[Gluster-users] Setting up a new gluster volume using a block device

2012-07-19 Thread Sallee, Stephen (Jake)
I am new to gluster so please be a bit patient with me. I am trying to setup a gluster volume with the bricks being /dev/sdb1 (or /dev/sdb, I have tried both) ... etc. however I get an error message and the operation fails. I do not have the error message (sorry!) the only brick I have

Re: [Gluster-users] Setting up a new gluster volume using a block device

2012-07-19 Thread David Coulson
Your gluster brick must be a directory, not a block device. The filesystem that directory is located on must supported xattr. David On 7/19/12 1:16 PM, Sallee, Stephen (Jake) wrote: I am new to gluster so please be a bit patient with me. I am trying to setup a gluster volume with the bricks