[Gluster-users] 'replace-brick' - why we plan to deprecate

2012-10-11 Thread Amar Tumballi
Hi All, When we initially came up with specs of 'glusterd', we needed an option to replace a dead brick, and few people even requested for having an option to migrate the data from the brick, when we are replacing it. The result of this is 'gluster volume replace-brick' CLI, and in the relea

[Gluster-users] 32(client) vs 64(server) bit problem

2012-10-11 Thread Marek Červenka
hi, i have problem with x86_64 on server vs x86 on the client (both centos6) i filled this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862908 can you someone confirm that is real bug? thanks -- --- Marek Cervenka ===

[Gluster-users] 3.3 joining existing cluster

2012-10-11 Thread Frank Carmickle
Hello Gluster users We had to migrate our gluster replicated store from three less capable nodes to two more capable nodes. When we did that we seem to have some meta data hanging around and at some point gluster crashed. All seemed to be fine for a while. Now we are trying to add in two mor

Re: [Gluster-users] Change transport type on volume from tcp to rdma

2012-10-11 Thread Ivan Dimitrov
http://community.gluster.org/q/how-to-change-transport-type-on-active-volume---glusterfs-3-3/ On 10/11/12 4:41 PM, John Mark Walker wrote: Cool - can you add this to http://community.gluster.org/ ? -JM - Original Message - What I did was: gluster volume stop VOLUME gluster volume

Re: [Gluster-users] Change transport type on volume from tcp to rdma

2012-10-11 Thread John Mark Walker
Cool - can you add this to http://community.gluster.org/ ? -JM - Original Message - > What I did was: > > gluster volume stop VOLUME > gluster volume delete VOLUME > > On each peer on each brick I did: > setfattr -x trusted.glusterfs.volume-id /mnt/brick1 > setfattr -x trusted.gfid /m

Re: [Gluster-users] Change transport type on volume from tcp to rdma

2012-10-11 Thread Ivan Dimitrov
What I did was: gluster volume stop VOLUME gluster volume delete VOLUME On each peer on each brick I did: setfattr -x trusted.glusterfs.volume-id /mnt/brick1 setfattr -x trusted.gfid /mnt/brick1 setfattr -x trusted.glusterfs.volume-id /mnt/brick2 setfattr -x trusted.gfid /mnt/brick2 rm -r /mnt/b

[Gluster-users] samba performance downgrade with glusterfs backend

2012-10-11 Thread nuaa_liuben
Hi folks, We found that samba performance downgrade a lot with glusterfs backend. volume info as followed, Volume Name: vol1 Type: Distribute Status: Started Number of Bricks: 1 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: pana53:/data/ Options Reconfigured: auth.allow: 192.168.* features.quota: on nfs.di