Re: [Gluster-users] centos 6.x glusterfs 3.2.7 firewall blocking

2013-10-14 Thread Joe Julian
glusterbot> glusterd's management port is 24007/tcp and 24008/tcp if you use rdma. Bricks (glusterfsd) use 24009 & up for <3.4 and 49152 & up for 3.4. (Deleted volumes do not reset this counter.) Additionally it will listen on 38465-38467/tcp for nfs, also 38468 for NLM since 3.3.0. NFS also d

Re: [Gluster-users] centos 6.x glusterfs 3.2.7 firewall blocking

2013-10-14 Thread James
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:35 AM, wrote: > centos 6.x > > gluster --version > > glusterfs 3.2.7 built on Jun 11 2012 13:22:29 > > > > The problem is that when i'm trying to probe like this: > > gluster peer probe [hostname] > > > > It never probe's because the firewall is blocking (when I turn it

[Gluster-users] centos 6.x glusterfs 3.2.7 firewall blocking

2013-10-14 Thread mvb
centos 6.x gluster --version glusterfs 3.2.7 built on Jun 11 2012 13:22:29 The problem is that when i'm trying to probe like this: gluster peer probe [hostname] It never probe's because the firewall is blocking (when I turn it of on both sides everything works) But I want to keep the

[Gluster-users] Error while running make on Linux machine - unable to install glusterfs

2013-10-14 Thread Chitra Kalle
I am trying to install glusterfs on a Linux machine. glusterfs version 3.3.2 *uname -orm* *GNU/Linux 2.6.22-6.4.3-amd64-2527508 x86_64* * * Ran* **./configure --prefix=mytempdir* * * No errors reported here. When I ran make, get this error. Any help appreciated. I am a newbie. Thanks, CR * mak

Re: [Gluster-users] Shutting down a GlusterFS server.

2013-10-14 Thread James
On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 07:13 +, jan.dre...@bertelsmann.de wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wondering why gluster has to heal itself in the first place - as > the underlying architicutre is a RAID5, that one should repair itself > and gluster should not notice a defect - or does "heal" mean > "re-sync"?! He

Re: [Gluster-users] Creating volume when peer is down

2013-10-14 Thread Maciej Gałkiewicz
On 14 October 2013 13:26, Vijay Bellur wrote: > volume specific extended attributes are written on brick directories at > the time of volume creation. This information is subsequently used for > validation at the time of starting a volume. > > Do you really want to create/start a brick on a peer

Re: [Gluster-users] Cluster Slowness with Glustrefs

2013-10-14 Thread pramod.p26
Hi David, Thanks for your reply. There are lot of files and sub-directorys under them. The problem is it takes around 10min to display the contents once I use ls command which is not normal. -- Regards, Pramod From: David Gibbons [mailto:david.c.gibb...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2

Re: [Gluster-users] Managing volumes is unreliable

2013-10-14 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 10/02/2013 06:05 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: On 10/02/2013 06:57 AM, Heggland, Christian wrote: Unsure if its recommended but you could try and do the following if the set command stops adding / removing settings: 1. Stop the volume 2. Edit the config file for that volume on each node ( /var/lib/g

Re: [Gluster-users] Creating volume when peer is down

2013-10-14 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 10/08/2013 05:50 PM, Maciej Gałkiewicz wrote: Hi Is it possible to create volume even though one of bricks is down? I have automated the process of creating volumes and downtime of the brick breaks it. volume specific extended attributes are written on brick directories at the time of vol

[Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.4.1 not able to mount the exports containing soft links

2013-10-14 Thread Rahul51 S
Hi, I am running the glusterFS 3.4.1 NFS server. I have created a distributed volume on server 1 , and I am trying to mount the soft link contained in the volume as NFS from server 2 . but it is failing with the error " mount.nfs: an incorrect mount option was specified" Below is the volume i

Re: [Gluster-users] Advice for building samba-glusterfs-vfs

2013-10-14 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 10/11/2013 10:20 AM, Dan Mons wrote: Following up on this: * GlusterFS 3.4.1 solves the problem of renaming over CIFS from a Windows client (via Samba3 and vfs_glusterfs/libgfapi). Happy days! * I still see 4 lines of this sort of thing for each file read in /var/log/glusterfs/bricks/*.log:

Re: [Gluster-users] Shutting down a GlusterFS server.

2013-10-14 Thread Jan.Dreyer
Hi, I'm wondering why gluster has to heal itself in the first place - as the underlying architicutre is a RAID5, that one should repair itself and gluster should not notice a defect - or does "heal" mean "re-sync"?! Regards Jan Von: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-boun