Another invocation of this issue:
E138: Can't write viminfo file /home/aorth/.viminfo!
This happened after using vim on several machines which share the same
networked /home directory. Usage wasn't concurrent, but within 10
seconds or so of each other. The client's volume log looks like this:
Alan,
I could be wrong, but the issue looks so much like the following bug?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041109
Pranith
- Original Message -
From: Alan Orth alan.o...@gmail.com
To: gluster-users gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:04:43 PM
Alan,
Could you check if you can re-create the issue with use-readdirp=no option
for the fuse mount?
Pranith
- Original Message -
From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com
To: Alan Orth alan.o...@gmail.com
Cc: gluster-users gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Thursday, March
Hi, Pranith.
Let me re-mount the volumes on my nodes using use-readdirp=no and do
some more testing.
Also, one of the suggestions in that bug thread was to drop caches. I
did this on one of the clients in question and then I was able to access
the file immediately (in this case, exit, then `ssh
- Original Message -
From: Alan Orth alan.o...@gmail.com
To: Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com
Cc: gluster-users gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 2:13:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Stale file handle with FUSE client
Hi, Pranith.
Let me
Pranith,
Ok, I've re-mounted several of my clients with the 'use-readdirp=no'
mount option and I'll keep an eye on them. Also good to hear about RHEL
6.5 kernel, as moving to RHEL 6.5 is something I will be doing on my
cluster clients as I see moments of opportunity (already upgraded a few).
Results of GlusterFS 3.6 Planning Meeting
*
The GlusterFS 3.6 Planning Meeting was held yesterday on IRC, with 25
feature proposals and 28 people actively involved in the discussion.
The results were...
Core features for 3.6
*
*
Hi All,
I am observing gfid mismatch issue with Glusterfs 3.4.2 version. I
observed the same issue is reported as Bug 860297.
Bug description says it has been fixed in Redhat update 4 Errata.
Is this fix is ported to Gluster repository as well ?
If not can anyone please post us the patch id
Sejal,
Checked the code, patch is present. May be the steps which lead to this
situation are different. What lead to this issue?
Pranith
- Original Message -
From: Sejal1 S sejal...@tcs.com
To: Gluster Devel gluster-de...@nongnu.org, Gluster Users
Gluster-users@gluster.org,
Hi,
Thanks for the advice, I finally have time to go back to this issue now.
It doesn't seem to be sticking on any particular part of the file system as
far as I can tell.
One thing I've noticed is I always get an error about missing 'option
transport-type'
2014-03-13 09:57:00.902189] E
Hello, all.
I am a little bit impressed by the lack of action on this topic. I hate to
be that guy, specially being new here, but it has to be done.
If I've got this right, we have here a chance of developing Gluster even
further, sponsored by Google, with a dedicated programmer for the summer.
Hello, all.
I am a little bit impressed by the lack of action on this topic. I hate to
be that guy, specially being new here, but it has to be done.
If I've got this right, we have here a chance of developing Gluster even
further, sponsored by Google, with a dedicated programmer for the summer.
thnx Carlos for your ambition Carlos
I'm not much of a developer but for what it's worth here my thoughts:
Your #1) sounds great, but does that mean object store or will it still be
whole files that are handled?
up to now I loved the feeling of having at least my files on the bricks if
I vote for 3,2,1 :
Best: the accelerator looks cool and would be awesome for supporting hi
throughput workloads w/ different consistency gaurantees. In hadoop this could
be valuable I think when we want fast ETL but can wait a few seconds for files
to b available in global namespace
2nd
Pranith,
We are performing same steps.
We are rebooting and then remounting the gluster volumes.
-Sejal
From:
Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com
To:
Sejal1 S sejal...@tcs.com
Cc:
Gluster Devel gluster-de...@nongnu.org, Gluster Users
Gluster-users@gluster.org,
Ok.. Maybe I was a little bit too enthusiastic ;)
Actually when I said vote, I never meant vote on my ideas, but here are
my ideas; Would you mind sharing your ?.
Well, it is already out there, so clarifications are required.
People, DO share your ideas, or, as an alternative, vote on the ones
Now, to the tech talk.
1) Striped, as far as I could see, already works on a block level and it
uses disk space in a more sensible way. auto-balance tends to be simpler,
or quicker, and resilience is embedded on each node. Other solutions in the
market do similar things and that works REALLY
I am a little bit impressed by the lack of action on this topic. I hate to be
that guy, specially being new here, but it has to be done.
If I've got this right, we have here a chance of developing Gluster even
further, sponsored by Google, with a dedicated programmer for the summer.
In other
has the 32 group limit been fixed yet? If not how about that :) ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789961
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Jeff Darcy jda...@redhat.com wrote:
I am a little bit impressed by the lack of action on this topic. I hate
to be
that guy, specially being
SRC:
http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.4.3beta1.tar.gz
This release is made off jenkins-release-63
-- Gluster Build System
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
I had a chat with Carlos on this subject (#3) the other day, from my point of
view it was very interesting to have a look at how Isilon leverages new backend
storage technologies. Ceph is of course making claims in this area as well. So
we (gluster) do indeed need to make some progress in this
Community,
My management wants me to build a deeper understanding and explain to them
as we migrate over to glusterfs from traditional NFS, why latency has
increased. We are currently using rhel 6.5 and glusterfs-fuse-3.4.2-1
version.
Latency has increased on our apache servers, not
CentOS 6.5, repo glusterfs-epel.repo
I used both of these as guide to upgrade
http://vbellur.wordpress.com/2013/07/15/upgrading-to-glusterfs-3-4/
http://vbellur.wordpress.com/2012/05/31/upgrading-to-glusterfs-3-3
My problem seems to be with trusted.glusterfs.volume-id that the 3.2.7 version
On 03/13/2014 09:18 AM, Alejandro Planas wrote:
Hello,
We have 2 AWS instances, 1 brick on each instance, one replicated volume
among both instances. When one of the instances fails completely and
autoscaling replaces it with a new one, we are having issues recreating
the replicated volume
On 03/13/2014 10:39 PM, bernhard glomm wrote:
*Ecologic Institute**Bernhard Glomm*
IT Administration
Phone: +49 (30) 86880 134
Fax:+49 (30) 86880 100
Skype: bernhard.glomm.ecologic
Website: http://ecologic.eu |
Bernhard Glomm
IT Administration
Phone: +49 (30) 86880 134
Fax: +49 (30) 86880 100
Skype: bernhard.glomm.ecologic
Ecologic Institut gemeinnützige GmbH | Pfalzburger Str. 43/44 | 10717 Berlin |
Germany
GF: R. Andreas Kraemer | AG: Charlottenburg HRB 57947 |
Did u see this?
http://joejulian.name/blog/glusterfs-path-or-a-prefix-of-it-is-already-part-of-a-volume/
Am 13.03.2014 17:39:10, schrieb Kent Nasveschuk:
CentOS 6.5, repo glusterfs-epel.repo
I used both of these as guide to upgrade
- Original Message -
Welcome, Carlos. I think it's great that you're taking initiative here.
+1 - I love enthusiastic fresh me^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hcommunity members! :)
However, it's also important to set proper expectations for what a GSoC
intern
could reasonably be expected to
3.4.3alpha1 RPMs for el5, el6, el7, fedora 19, fedora 20, and fedora 21
(rawhide) are available in YUM repos at
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/3.4.3beta1/
--
Kaleb
___
Gluster-users mailing list
On 31 Aug 2013, at 01:52 , Justin Clift jcl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 30/08/2013, at 10:59 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
Hi,
I run ./configure then make. But I see the following error. Does
anybody know how to compile gluster 3.4 on Mac OS X 10.8.4? Thanks.
Hi Peng,
GlusterFS doesn't yet work on
Khoi:
From the discussions I've seen here, and some documentation on the web, the
gluster client has some issues with small files access.
As a matter of fact, gluster tends to perform a little less well with small
files.
There is a number of things that can be done in order to improve this.
Denis:
Out of curiosity, and never meaning to discourage you, but gluster, deep
inside, is a server-side application, designed to manage multiple volume
spans. You get the cluster stuff, of course.
What would be the objective of coding Gluster on Mac OS, if Apple no longer
sells that platform
On 13/03/2014, at 9:04 PM, Dennis Schafroth wrote:
On 31 Aug 2013, at 01:52 , Justin Clift jcl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 30/08/2013, at 10:59 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
Hi,
I run ./configure then make. But I see the following error. Does
anybody know how to compile gluster 3.4 on Mac OS X 10.8.4?
On 13/03/2014, at 9:56 PM, Carlos Capriotti wrote:
Denis:
Out of curiosity, and never meaning to discourage you, but gluster, deep
inside, is a server-side application, designed to manage multiple volume
spans. You get the cluster stuff, of course.
What would be the objective of coding
Sequence of events:
spun up new Centos 6.5 VM
yum -y update
yum install glusterfs
this installed gluster 3.4.0
find out there is no gluster-server package in CentOS repos.
added glusterfs-epel, glusterfs-noarch-epel
yum -y install gluster-server
service glusterd start [*FAILED*]
yum
[snip]
2) We have a recurring issue with split-brain solution. There is an entry
on trello asking/suggesting a mechanism that arbitrates this resolution
automatically. I pretty much think this could come together with another
solution that is file replication consistency check.
Anything
What link did you use to fetch your .repo file ?
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Ted Miller tmil...@hcjb.org wrote:
Sequence of events:
spun up new Centos 6.5 VM
yum -y update
yum install glusterfs
this installed gluster 3.4.0
find out there is no gluster-server package in CentOS
Yeah... I found the Joe Julian do's and don'ts blog post that pretty much
says I shouldn't have started down this road too late. But I have started
down the road, so I'd like to make the best of it. (
http://joejulian.name/blog/glusterfs-replication-dos-and-donts/)
So now I'm wondering what I
I actually copied it from an oVirt node, where they get it from. Content of
the /etc/yum.repos.d/glusterfs-epel.repo file is:
# Place this file in your /etc/yum.repos.d/ directory
[glusterfs-epel]
name=GlusterFS is a clustered file-system capable of scaling to several
petabytes.
On 14/03/2014, at 2:25 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
snip
Maybe flush your yum cache, or force a different mirror or something?
Oops, ignore that. Mis-read your message.
I should really get some sleep :
+ Justin
--
Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat
twitter.com/realjustinclift
40 matches
Mail list logo
