Hi Carlos,
I know your working with Glusterfs in VMWARE and about to embark on the
QEMU integration.
I was unable to get QEMU installed correctly because virtualisation
technology was not enabled.
I have come across this blog explaining how to set that up:
http://thetechnologychronicle.
Just another thing i noticed:
when i mount the volume as nfs on linux and i do a: find .
i get -no- errors at all!
it seems to me the issue i'm expericencing on linux and windows is related to
the permissions of the files. Whenever nfs tries to read the permissions of a
file it fails a lot of th
I second that comment !
Boy, I was chasing ghosts until very recently, regarding disk
configurations (physical RAID).
I had a 4 x 1 TB SAS disks, configured as RAID5 on a Dell PERC 6, and
thought that would be good enough.
My network throughput would not go over 280 Mbps and I was blaming Linux.
Hey David,
Can you provide the qemu command to run each of them? What's your
gluster/disk/network layout look like?
Depending on your disk and network setup you may be hitting a bottleneck there
that would prevent gfapi from performing at capacity. Lots of options here that
could impact thin
On 04/03/2014 09:17 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
Suppose one has a distributed non-replicated glusterfs file system where
the bricks are subdirectories of real file systems, and the file systems
also contain data outside of the brick directories. Never mind if this
is a good idea or not; it's a thou
Suppose one has a distributed non-replicated glusterfs file system where
the bricks are subdirectories of real file systems, and the file systems
also contain data outside of the brick directories. Never mind if this is
a good idea or not; it's a thought experiment. Does glusterfs balance
space
GlusterFS-3.4.3 RPMs for el5-7 (RHEL, CentOS, etc.) are available now in
the YUM repo at
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.4/3.4.3/. Other
distros coming soon.
RPMs for Fedora are in the updates-testing Fedora repo. They will
migrate to the updates repo after a nominal tes
Good Morning,
In my earlier experience invoking a VM using qemu/libgfapi, I reported that
it was noticeably faster than the same VM invoked from libvirt using a FUSE
mount; however, this was erroneous as the qemu/libgfapi-invoked image was
created using 2x the RAM and cpu's...
So, invoking the im
Try mounting like this:
mount -t nfs -o
rw,async,vers=3,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,noatime,nodiratime
localhost:/caviar_data11
/media
Try to test with fresh files, and not necessarily already existing ones.
Then the existing ones.
Let's see what it tells us.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:05 AM, VAN C
