Folks,
While I was looking into glusterd backlogs I could see there are few BZs
which were marked as needinfo on the reporter as the information was
not sufficient enough for further analysis and the reporter hasn't
gotten back with the required details.
Ideally we should close these bugs saying
Forgive me for a stupid question, I hav looked at the Wiki page on multiple
networks.
If I have a set of Gluster storage servers which have both a gigabit network
connection and a 10Gig network connection
(or an Infiniband network connection) how do I make sure the Gluster traffic
goes over
AFAIK multiple network scenario only works if you are not using Gluster
via FUSE mounts or gfapi from remote hosts. It will work for NFS access
or when you set up something like Samba with CTDB. Just not with native
Gluster as the server always tells the clients which addresses to
connect to:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:43:15 +0100
Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 04:31:38PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
Folks,
While I was looking into glusterd backlogs I could see there are
few BZs which were marked as needinfo on the reporter as the
information was
On 11/13/2014 05:13 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 04:31:38PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
Folks,
While I was looking into glusterd backlogs I could see there are few BZs
which were marked as needinfo on the reporter as the information was
not sufficient enough for further
AFAIK multiple network scenario only works if you are not using Gluster via
FUSE mounts or gfapi from remote hosts. It will work for NFS access or when
you set up something like Samba with CTDB. Just not with native Gluster as
the server always tells the clients which addresses to connect to:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:22:56 +0530
Lalatendu Mohanty lmoha...@redhat.com wrote:
snip
+1 to the idea of closing a bug if we dont get required information
in a stipulated time frame. However I would suggest a more lenient
time frame i.e. at least 4 weeks. That gives ample time for the
reporter
Hi all
may I just add a question to the topic?
In a scenario with (say) two or three servers, one distributed volume,
native (fuse) clients, and stable filesystems with more read than write
operations, what is the typical amount of traffic between the servers,
compared to the client-server
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 06:06:28 PM Alex Crow wrote:
AFAIK multiple network scenario only works if you are not using Gluster via
FUSE mounts or gfapi from remote hosts. It will work for NFS access or when
you set up something like Samba with CTDB. Just not with native Gluster as
the server always
Hi all,
Now I try glusterfs 3.6.0, use the same configuration to do test. But the
situation has not improved, several hours later, bricks' log still says socket
disconnection.
I doubt this problem may be caused by epoll, so I patch system using
Hi Atin,
FMPOV, 2 weeks time looks to be good, at the same time, please give
importance for the product version it is reported. If they are into our
running stable or near versions, we can be some more flexible.
--Humble
--Humble
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Atin Mukherjee
11 matches
Mail list logo
