Re: [Gluster-users] libgfapi access

On 12/10/2015 07:15 PM, Ankireddypalle Reddy wrote: Hi, Please let me know in case you need any more details. Even for only write operations fuse seems to outperform libgfapi. Is it because of disperse volumes?. Also I noticed a lot of data loss in case I use libgfapi asyn I/O for

Re: [Gluster-users] Add-brick and arbiter volume

On 12/11/2015 08:30 AM, Tim wrote: Hey List, re: https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2015-August/023030.html Is this possible yet? This will make it to glusterfs-3.8. -Ravi As I just tried replacing an arbiter volume using replace-brick and it seems that it's now using the

Re: [Gluster-users] libgfapi access

On 12/10/2015 03:31 AM, Ankireddypalle Reddy wrote: Hi, I upgraded my setup to gluster 3.7.3. I tested writes by performing writes through fuse and through libgfapi. Attached are the profiles generated from fuse and libgfapi. The test programs essentially writes 1 blocks each

[Gluster-users] Add-brick and arbiter volume

Hey List, re: https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2015-August/023030.html Is this possible yet? As I just tried replacing an arbiter volume using replace-brick and it seems that it's now using the same amount of space as the other bricks. Cheers, Tim

Re: [Gluster-users] libgfapi access

Hi, Please let me know in case you need any more details. Even for only write operations fuse seems to outperform libgfapi. Is it because of disperse volumes?. Also I noticed a lot of data loss in case I use libgfapi asyn I/O for disperse volumes. Thanks and Regards, Ram -Original

[Gluster-users] Gluster HA for SMB with CTDB - IO Error

Hi Gluster List, I'm trying to configure a 2 node GlusterFS replicated volume with CTDB managing SMB failover and I'm wondering if the behaviour I am seeing is normal... If I am playing back a large video file from a client (both Windows and Linux) mounting the SMB share and issue `ctdb moveip`

Re: [Gluster-users] Add-brick and arbiter volume

On 12/11/2015 09:37 AM, Ravishankar N wrote: As I just tried replacing an arbiter volume using replace-brick and it seems that it's now using the same amount of space as the other bricks. There is a bug in glusterfs 3.7.6 where if the glusterd gets restarted for whatever reason, and you do

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster - Performance issue while copying bulk files/folders

On 12/09/2015 07:03 AM, Srikanth Mampilakal wrote: However, if I do dd to check the copy speed, I get the below result. [root@ClientServer ~]# time sh -c "dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/testmount/test.tmp bs=4k count=2 && sync" 2+0 records in 2+0 records out 8192 bytes (82 MB) copied,

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster - Performance issue while copying bulk files/folders

Response inline. - Original Message - > From: "Srikanth Mampilakal" > To: gluster-users@gluster.org > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 7:59:04 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster - Performance issue while copying bulk > files/folders > > > > Hi

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster - Performance issue while copying bulk files/folders

Hi members, Really appreciate if you can share your thoughts or any feedback for resolving the slow copy issue Regards Srikanth On 10-Dec-2015 2:12 AM, "Srikanth Mampilakal" wrote: > Hi, > > > I have production gluster file service used as a shared storage where

Re: [Gluster-users] Strange file corruption

Am 09.12.2015 um 22:33 schrieb Lindsay Mathieson: On 10/12/2015 3:15 AM, Udo Giacomozzi wrote: This were the commands executed on node #2 during step 6: gluster volume add-brick "systems" replica 3 metal1:/data/gluster/systems gluster volume heal "systems" full # to trigger

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster - Performance issue while copying bulk files/folders

Hello, I doesn't use version 3.7 in production. I think need try new options (I don't know how it improve work with big files but it should improve work with small files): gluster v set prodcmsroot client.event-threads 4 gluster v set prodcmsroot server.event-threads 4 gluster v set prodcmsroot