[Gluster-users] RAID on GLUSTER node

Hi All, We have a fairly powerful server sitting at office with 128 Gig RAM and 36 X 4 TB drives. I am planning to utilize this server as a backend storage with GlusterFS on it. I have been doing lot of reading on Glusterfs, but I do not see any definite recommendation on having RAID on GLUSTER

Re: [Gluster-users] Memory leak in GlusterFS FUSE client

I have made changes to fix the lookup leak in a different way (as discussed with Pranith) and uploaded them in the latest patch set #4 - http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13096/ Please check if it resolves the mem leak and hopefully doesn't result in any assertion :) Thanks, Soumya On

[Gluster-users] subvolumes report error when copying small files

Hello: I have a six node cluster in 3 X 2 (distributed replicated) mode, with glusterfs 3.7.6 and centos 6.3. problem is that subvolumes report error from time to time when dealing with bunch of small files, such as tar, cp command. the following is snip from log file. (can see a lot of

Re: [Gluster-users] RAID on GLUSTER node

On 01/12/2016 04:34 AM, Pawan Devaiah wrote: Hi All, We have a fairly powerful server sitting at office with 128 Gig RAM and 36 X 4 TB drives. I am planning to utilize this server as a backend storage with GlusterFS on it. I have been doing lot of reading on Glusterfs, but I do not see any

Re: [Gluster-users] possible memory leak in 3.6.0.29

hi Francesco, I can take a look at this if you could give me statedump of the process which is consuming so much memory. If the process consuming so much memory is client process. Please use

Re: [Gluster-users] High I/O And Processor Utilization

On 12/01/16 13:38, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: is 3.7.7 far off? It is getting delayed because of me. Let me see what I can do. Will update you with something by end of this week. Oh, no hurry - didn't mean to pressure you - just curious. It'll be ready when its ready. Thanks, --

[Gluster-users] subvolumes report error when copying small files

Hello: I have a six node cluster in 3 X 2 (distributed replicated) mode, with glusterfs 3.7.6 and centos 6.3. problem is that subvolumes report error from time to time when dealing with bunch of small files, such as tar, cp command. the following is snip from log file. (can see a lot of

Re: [Gluster-users] High I/O And Processor Utilization

On 01/10/2016 04:44 AM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: On 9/01/2016 12:34 PM, Ravishankar N wrote: If you're trying arbiter, it would be good if you can compile the 3.7 branch and use it since it has an important fix (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12479/) that will only make it to

Re: [Gluster-users] RAID on GLUSTER node

Hello, For any system, 36 disks raise disk failure probability. Do you plan GlusterFS with only one server? You should think about failure at each level and be prepared for it: - Motherboard failure (full server down) - Disks failure - Network cable failure - File system corruption

Re: [Gluster-users] High I/O And Processor Utilization

On 11/01/16 15:37, Krutika Dhananjay wrote: Kyle, Based on the testing we have done from our end, we've found that 512MB is a good number that is neither too big nor too small, and provides good performance both on the IO side and with respect to self-heal. Hi Krutika, I experimented a lot

Re: [Gluster-users] different free disk space size on distributed replicated

On 01/08/2016 06:30 PM, Patrick Kaiser wrote: hi, I am running a distributed replicated gluster fs setup with 4 nodes. currently i have no problems but i was wondering when i am running gluster volume status and seeing different free disk space on every node. I am wondering if I should not

Re: [Gluster-users] Memory leak in GlusterFS FUSE client

On 01/11/2016 05:11 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: Brief test shows that Ganesha stopped leaking and crashing, so it seems to be good for me. Thanks for checking. Nevertheless, back to my original question: what about FUSE client? It is still leaking despite all the fixes applied. Should

Re: [Gluster-users] Memory leak in GlusterFS FUSE client

Hello, I also experience high memory usage on my gluster clients. Sample : [image: Images intégrées 1] Can I help in testing/debugging ? Cordialement, Mathieu CHATEAU http://www.lotp.fr 2016-01-12 7:24 GMT+01:00 Soumya Koduri : > > > On 01/11/2016 05:11 PM, Oleksandr

Re: [Gluster-users] High I/O And Processor Utilization

On 01/12/2016 08:52 AM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: On 11/01/16 15:37, Krutika Dhananjay wrote: Kyle, Based on the testing we have done from our end, we've found that 512MB is a good number that is neither too big nor too small, and provides good performance both on the IO side and with

Re: [Gluster-users] subvolumes report error when copying small files

On 01/12/2016 08:36 AM, ngsflow wrote: Hello: I have a six node cluster in 3 X 2 (distributed replicated) mode, with glusterfs 3.7.6 and centos 6.3. problem is that subvolumes report error from time to time when dealing with bunch of small files, such as tar, cp command. the following

Re: [Gluster-users] Memory leak in GlusterFS FUSE client

I tried like suggested: echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches sync It lower a bit usage: before: [image: Images intégrées 2] after: [image: Images intégrées 1] Cordialement, Mathieu CHATEAU http://www.lotp.fr 2016-01-12 7:34 GMT+01:00 Mathieu Chateau : > Hello, >

Re: [Gluster-users] Memory leak in GlusterFS FUSE client

Just in case, here is Valgrind output on FUSE client with 3.7.6 + API-related patches we discussed before: https://gist.github.com/cd6605ca19734c1496a4 12.01.2016 08:24, Soumya Koduri написав: For fuse client, I tried vfs drop_caches as suggested by Vijay in an earlier mail. Though all the

[Gluster-users] 3.8 Plan changes - proposal

Hi All, We discussed the following proposal for 3.8 in the maintainers mailing list and there was general consensus about the changes being a step in the right direction. Would like to hear your thoughts about the same. Changes to 3.8 Plan: 1. Include 4.0 features such

Re: [Gluster-users] Memory leak in GlusterFS FUSE client

Brief test shows that Ganesha stopped leaking and crashing, so it seems to be good for me. Nevertheless, back to my original question: what about FUSE client? It is still leaking despite all the fixes applied. Should it be considered another issue? 11.01.2016 12:26, Soumya Koduri написав: