Re: [Gluster-users] Can I do SSL with Gluster v3.4.2 ?

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:48 AM, dev wrote: > I'm trying to setup SSL transport with glusterfs following the guide > here: http://blog.gluster.org/author/zbyszek/ > > I've copied the resulting ca, pem and key files to my server > (to /etc/ssl) as well as a copy on my gluster

[Gluster-users] GlusterFS + Ubuntu + Infiniband RDMA

Hello, Does anyone have a working setup of GlusterFS on Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS using Infiniband & RDMA ? I am planning to use Infiniband(IPoIB) for Cluster-Interconnect & how would RMDA be configured. Any info is appreciated. -- Deepak

[Gluster-users] Can I do SSL with Gluster v3.4.2 ?

I'm trying to setup SSL transport with glusterfs following the guide here: http://blog.gluster.org/author/zbyszek/ I've copied the resulting ca, pem and key files to my server (to /etc/ssl) as well as a copy on my gluster client. The link above does not explain the proper mount options for

[Gluster-users] 90 Brick/Server suggestions?

Hi, We are evaluating dell DSS7000 chassis with 90 disks. Has anyone used that much brick per server? Any suggestions, advices? Thanks, Serkan ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org

[Gluster-users] GlusterFS Performance Test

Hello Gluster-Community, we want to make some Performance Tests with Gluster (4 Nodes, also with HA) and now there is a discussion about the hardware configuration. Are there any experiences concerning this? It is better to have more CPU-Cores OR higher CPU-Rate OR more RAM? AFAIK the brick

[Gluster-users] Optimal shard size & self-heal algorithm for VM hosting?

Hey guys, I keep seeing different recommendations for the best shard sizes for VM images, from 64MB to 512MB. What's the benefit of smaller v larger shards? I'm guessing smaller shards are quicker to heal, but larger shards will provide better sequential I/O for single clients? Anything else? I

Re: [Gluster-users] CentOS Storage SIG Repo for 3.8 is behind 3 versions (3.8.5). Is it still being used and can I help?

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 02:53:26PM +0100, Pavel Szalbot wrote: > Hi, tested it with 3.8.8 on client (CentOS) and server (Ubuntu) and > everything is OK now. Awesome, many thanks for testing and reporting back the results. Niels > > -ps > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Pavel Szalbot

Re: [Gluster-users] CentOS Storage SIG Repo for 3.8 is behind 3 versions (3.8.5). Is it still being used and can I help?

Hi, tested it with 3.8.8 on client (CentOS) and server (Ubuntu) and everything is OK now. -ps On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Pavel Szalbot wrote: > Hi Daryl, > > I must have missed your reply and found out about it when reading about > 3.8.9 and searching in

Re: [Gluster-users] CentOS Storage SIG Repo for 3.8 is behind 3 versions (3.8.5). Is it still being used and can I help?

Hi Daryl, I must have missed your reply and found out about it when reading about 3.8.9 and searching in gluster-users history. I will test the same setup with gluster 3.8.8 i.e. libvirt 2.0.0-10.el7_3.4, glusterfs 3.8.8-1.el7 and gluster 3.8.8 on servers (Ubuntu) and let you know. This is

Re: [Gluster-users] CentOS Storage SIG Repo GlusterFS 3.8.9 testing results

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:00:18AM -0800, Daryl lee wrote: > Niels, > Thanks for submitting the GlusterFS 3.8.9 package to the testing repo. I > have my testing feedback to provide but I'm not sure where you want me to > post this (should I subscribe to the package mailing list and post it >