On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:49 AM, atris adam wrote:
> Hello everybody
>
> I have 3 datacenters in different regions, Can I deploy my own cloud
> storage with the help of glusterfs on the physical nodes?If I can, what are
> the differences between cloud storage glusterfs and local gluster storage?
Dear Krutika,
Sorry for asking so naively but can you tell me on what factor do you base that
the client and server event-threads parameters for a volume should be set to 4?
Is this metric for example based on the number of cores a GlusterFS server has?
I am asking because I saw my GlusterFS vo
I did a typo during the initial setup but corrected it. I do see a few
files in the .trashcan folder that were created. However, gluster stopped
about 3 hours after I enabled the feature. I don't have anything else in
the logs than these entries.
Ludwig
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Anoop C S
Hi Ben,
Sorry this took so long, but we had a real-time forecasting exercise
last week and I could only get to this now.
Backend Hardware/OS:
* Much of the information on our back end system is included at the
top of
http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-April/030529.h
glusterfs-3.6 version is no more active and not supported by community. You
should upgrade to the latest which is 3.10 (long term maintenance). If you
want to explore more, then you can choose to upgrade to 3.11 (short term
maintenance) which has more features but has a life of only 3 months.
On T
Hi,
This problem has been solved.
Kind regards, Sophie.
From: sophie.loewent...@smals.be
To: gluster-users@gluster.org,
Date: 20/06/2017 16:01
Subject:[Gluster-users] Unable to get transaction opinfo for
transaction ID gluster version 3.6
Sent by:gluster-users-boun.
On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 08:52 -0400, Ludwig Gamache wrote:
> All,
>
> I currently have 2 bricks running Gluster 3.10.1. This is a Centos
> installation. On Friday last
> week, I enabled the trashcan feature on one of my volumes:
> gluster volume set date01 features.trash on
I think you misspelled
Hi,
Release tagging has been postponed by a day to accommodate a fix for a
regression that has been introduced between 3.11.0 and 3.11.1 (see [1]
for details).
As a result 3.11.1 will be tagged on the 21st June as of now (further
delays will be notified to the lists appropriately).
Thanks,
On 06/20/2017 08:41 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Shyam mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi,
It's time to prepare the 3.11.1 release, which falls on the 20th of
each month [4], and hence would be June-20th-2017 this time around.
This ma
All,
Over the week-end, one of my volume became unavailable. All clients could
not access their mount points. On some of the clients, I had user processes
that we using these mount points. So, I could not do a umount/mount without
killing these processes.
I also noticed that when I restarted the
Hi,
I have some blocked transactions. Does anybody have some advise on how I
could mend this because I am unsure where to start?
I believe this broke after I issued some set auth.allow commands:
# gluster volume set oem-shared auth.allow
10.54.54.57,10.54.54.160,10.54.54.161,10.54.54.213,10.54.
All,
I currently have 2 bricks running Gluster 3.10.1. This is a Centos
installation. On Friday last week, I enabled the trashcan feature on one of
my volumes:
gluster volume set date01 features.trash on
I also limited the max file size to 500MB:
gluster volume set data01 features.trash-max-fil
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Shyam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's time to prepare the 3.11.1 release, which falls on the 20th of
> each month [4], and hence would be June-20th-2017 this time around.
>
> This mail is to call out the following,
>
> 1) Are there any pending *blocker* bugs that need to be
Thanks Gaurav!
1. Any time estimation on to when this fix would be released?
2. Any recommended workaround?
Best,
Guy.
From: Gaurav Yadav [mailto:gya...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 9:46 AM
To: Guy Cukierman
Cc: Atin Mukherjee ; gluster-users@gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster
On 20/06/2017 8:43 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
bumps in revisions usually address some minor issue in the packaging.
I've never announced them AFAIR.
Debian and Ubuntu packaging bits are at [1] and e.g. the glusterfs-3.8
bits for jessie are at [2].
You can check the commit message to see wh
On 06/19/2017 07:28 PM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
On 18/06/2017 12:47 PM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
I installed 3.8.12 a while back and the packages seem to have been
updated since (2017-06-13), prompting me for updates.
I haven't seen any release announcements or notes on this though.
Bump
Couple of things:
1. Like Darrell suggested, you should enable stat-prefetch and increase
client and server event threads to 4.
# gluster volume set performance.stat-prefetch on
# gluster volume set client.event-threads 4
# gluster volume set server.event-threads 4
2. Also glusterfs-3.10.1 and
Have you tried with:
performance.strict-o-direct : off
performance.strict-write-ordering : off
They can be changed dynamically.
On 20 June 2017 at 17:21, Sahina Bose wrote:
> [Adding gluster-users]
>
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Chris Boot wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I have 3x servers
[Adding gluster-users]
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Chris Boot wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have 3x servers in a "hyper-converged" oVirt 4.1.2 + GlusterFS 3.10
> configuration. My VMs run off a replica 3 arbiter 1 volume comprised of
> 6 bricks, which themselves live on two SSDs in each of the s
19 matches
Mail list logo
