Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster processes remaining after stopping glusterd

Thank you Atin . That's exactly what i wanted. De : Atin Mukherjee Envoyé : mercredi 18 octobre 2017 14:17 À : ismael mondiu Cc : gluster-users@gluster.org Objet : Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster processes remaining after stopping glusterd

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster + synology

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Alex Chekholko wrote: > In theory, you can run GlusterFS on a Synology box, as it is "just a Linux > box". In practice, you might be the first person to ever try it. > Not sure if this would be the first attempt. Synology seems to bundle

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster command not respond

I would first check that you have the same version on both servers. On Oct 18, 2017 6:46 PM, "Ngo Leung" wrote: > Dear Sir / Madam > > > > I had been using Glusterfs of both nodes, and it is under in distribute > mode. But I cannot use all of the gluster commands at one

Re: [Gluster-users] warning spam in the logs after tiering experiment

Hi Alastair I apologize my email is off topic, but I also have strange issues on a volume and it happened to be volume with hot-tier attached to it in past. Can you do me a favor and test something on the volume where you used to have hot-tier? I'm working with RH on issue where glusterfs fuse

Re: [Gluster-users] warning spam in the logs after tiering experiment

forgot to mention Gluster version 3.10.6 On 18 October 2017 at 13:26, Alastair Neil wrote: > a short while ago I experimented with tiering on one of my volumes. I > decided it was not working out so I removed the tier. I now have spam in > the glusterd.log evert 7

[Gluster-users] warning spam in the logs after tiering experiment

a short while ago I experimented with tiering on one of my volumes. I decided it was not working out so I removed the tier. I now have spam in the glusterd.log evert 7 seconds: [2017-10-18 17:17:29.578327] W [socket.c:3207:socket_connect] 0-tierd: Ignore failed connection attempt on

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster + synology

In theory, you can run GlusterFS on a Synology box, as it is "just a Linux box". In practice, you might be the first person to ever try it. On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Ben Mabey wrote: > Hi, > Does anyone have any experience of using Synology NAS servers as

[Gluster-users] Gluster command not respond

Dear Sir / Madam I had been using Glusterfs of both nodes, and it is under in distribute mode. But I cannot use all of the gluster commands at one of the node recently, any gluster command not respond (E.g volume info or pool list), and I got the error in cli.log . Does anyone can help me,

[Gluster-users] ObjectStore on top of gluster volume

Hello Gluster Community, does anybody know how much performance (read/write bandwith) I will loose if I use an object store on top of a gluster volume? Any experiences? Regards David Spisla Software Developer david.spi...@iternity.com

Re: [Gluster-users] gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal

It looks like these entries don't have a corresponding file path, they exist only in .glusters and appear to be orphaned: [root@tpc-cent-glus2-081017 ~]# find /exp/b4/gv0 -samefile /exp/b4/gv0/.glusterfs/e0/c5/e0c56bf7-8bfe-46ca-bde1-e46b92d33df3

[Gluster-users] Mounting of Gluster volumes in Kubernetes

Hi all, Wondered if there are others in the community using GlusterFS on Google Compute Engine and Kubernetes via Google Container Engine together. We're running glusterfs 3.7.6 on Ubuntu Xenial across 3 GCE nodes. We have a single replicated volume of ~800GB that our pods running in Kubernetes

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster processes remaining after stopping glusterd

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 3:28 PM, ismael mondiu wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that when i stop my gluster server via systemctl stop glusterd > command , one glusterfs process is still up. > > Which is the correct way to stop all gluster processes in my host? > Stopping glusterd

Re: [Gluster-users] gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal

Hey Matt, >From the xattr output, it looks like the files are not present on the arbiter brick & needs healing. But on the parent it does not have the pending markers set for those entries. The workaround for this is you need to do a lookup on the file which needs heal from the mount, so it will