.
Regards
Rafi KC
On 27/05/20 5:49 pm, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
Hi Rafi,
I have a test oVirt 4.3.9 cluster with Gluster v7.5 on CentOS7.
Can you provide the rpms and I will try to test.
Also, please share the switch that disables this behaviour (in case something
goes wrong).
Best Regards,
Strahil
as I don't
have to backport to a previous version.
May I ask you the access protocol that you use (FUSE, SMB , NFS, gfapi).
I did the testing on a fuse protocol.
Rafi KC
On 27/05/20 4:14 pm, Felix Kölzow wrote:
Dear Rafi KC,
lets suppose I going to spend some time for testing. H
.
Regards
Rafi KC
On 27/05/20 11:26 am, RAFI KC wrote:
Hi All,
I have been working on POC to improve readdirp performance
improvement. At the end of the experiment, The results are showing
promising result in performance, overall there is a 104% improvement
for full filesystem crawl compared to the
know.
Regards
Rafi KC
On 27/05/20 12:37 pm, Felix Kölzow wrote:
Dear Rafi,
thanks for your effort. I think this is of great interest of many
gluster users. Thus, I would really encourage you to
test and to further improve this feature. Maybe it is beneficial to
create a certain guid
workloads, I
would be very happy to assist. If wanted to test the patch and run a
performance test on your setup, I could help with back-porting the patch
to the version of your choice.
https://review.gluster.org/24469
https://review.gluster.org/24470
Regards
Rafi KC
Community
021# Gluster Community Meeting - 14-04-2020
### Previous Meeting minutes:
- http://github.com/gluster/community
- Recording of this meeting-
### Date/Time: Check the [community
calendar](https://calendar.google.com/calendar/b/1?cid=dmViajVibDBrbnNiOWQwY205ZWg5cGJsaTRAZ3JvdXAuY2FsZW5kYXIuZ2
David
Am Mi., 6. Nov. 2019 um 04:10 Uhr schrieb RAFI KC <mailto:rkavu...@redhat.com>>:
I will take a look at the profile info shared. Since there is a
huge difference in the performance numbers between fuse and samba,
it would be great if we can get the profile info of fus
On 11/5/19 4:53 PM, Riccardo Murri wrote:
Is it possible for you to repeat the test by disabling ctime or increasing the
inode size to a higher value say 1024?
Sure! How do I disable ctime or increase the inode size?
Would this suffice to disable `ctime`?
sudo gluster volume set gluste
repeat, and we can find out it by comparing with fuse.
Also if possible, can you please get client profile info from fuse mount
using the command `setxattr -n trusted.io-stats-dump -v /tmp/iostat.log> `.
Regards
Rafi KC
On 11/5/19 11:05 PM, David Spisla wrote:
I did the test with Glus
On 11/4/19 8:46 PM, David Spisla wrote:
Dear Gluster Community,
I also have a issue concerning performance. The last days I updated
our test cluster from GlusterFS v5.5 to v7.0 . The setup in general:
2 HP DL380 Servers with 10Gbit NICs, 1 Distribute-Replica 2 Volume
with 2 Replica Pairs. C
On 11/4/19 2:41 PM, Riccardo Murri wrote:
Hello Amar,
Can you please check the profile info [1] ? That may give some hints.
I am attaching the output of `sudo gluster volume profile info` as a text file
to preserve formatting. This covers the time from Friday night to
Monday morning;
during
brick. So you can initiate a
reset-brick start, then you have to replace your failed disk and create
new brick with same name . Once you have healthy disk and brick, you can
commit the reset-brick.
Let's know if you have any question,
Rafi KC
On 4/10/19 3:39 PM, David Spisla wrote:
doc with the information.
Regards
Rafi KC
On 3/6/19 2:03 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote:
Hi Sanju,
Thanks for the response.
I have resolved the issue, actually I have updated from 3.7.6 to 5.0,
in new version RPC is coming from libtirpb , but I forgot to enable
"--with-libtirp
Hi there,
Rafi KC (rkavu...@redhat.com) invites you to participate in the Doodle
poll "Gluster Community Bug Triage meeting."
Participate now
https://doodle.com/poll/tsywtwfngfk4ssr8?tmail=poll_invitecontact_participant_invitation&tlink=pollbtn
What is Doodle? Doodle is a web serv
14 matches
Mail list logo
