[Gluster-users] how rebalance critical is?

. There are lots of small files also. So how critical this rebalance function is? What will happen, if i will stop it and do not complete at all? what is the point of rebalnce? I don't mind, if second storage server will be used only when first will be full. -- Best regards, Roman. Community

[Gluster-users] glusterfs 3.6.5 and selfheal

images on different replicated volumes. I mean I'm not sure if it is wrong or right, just curious of this. -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] Compiling 3.13.2 under FreeBSD 11.1?

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeit...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 05/09/2018 09:02 AM, Roman Serbski wrote: >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeit...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> That's certainly tru

Re: [Gluster-users] Compiling 3.13.2 under FreeBSD 11.1?

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > That's certainly true. The issue hasn't been fixed in any version of > gluster yet. > > You can help moving it along by voting +1 on > https://review.gluster.org/19974 Will do -- thanks! > Based on that gdb bt you

Re: [Gluster-users] Compiling 3.13.2 under FreeBSD 11.1?

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Roman Serbski <mefysto...@gmail.com> wrote: > # gdb gluster > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are > welcome to change it and

Re: [Gluster-users] Compiling 3.13.2 under FreeBSD 11.1?

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:19 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > See https://review.gluster.org/19974 Many thanks Kaleb. Your patch did the trick and I did manage to compile, however I get a Segmentation fault when trying to execute gluster. I'm using the following options to

[Gluster-users] Compiling 3.13.2 under FreeBSD 11.1?

Hello, Has anyone managed to successfully compile the latest 3.13.2 under FreeBSD 11.1? ./autogen.sh and ./configure seem to work but make fails: Making all in src CC glfs.lo cc: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-rdynamic' [-Wunused-command-line-argument] cc: warning:

[Gluster-users] gluster 3.6.5 safe upgrade

Hello, Currently runnig for about a year glusterfs 3.6.5 on my glusterfs solution. Would like to upgrade it to some more recent version. Which one is it safe to upgrade to? 3.10 or 3.12? And am I able to upgrade just with 1 jump or I have to do it in some other way? -- Best regards, Roman

[Gluster-users] glusterfs distributed volume and samba, help pls.

to the second server also? How the data flow will go in this scenario? Client-gluster1-gluster2 or client-gluster2 ? I hope I do not have to setup samba share on the second server. In case I have to, what would it look like for windows clients? -- Best regards, Roman

[Gluster-users] Basic questions

on volumes? I will not use tiering with ssd. The network is going to be 10Gbps. Any advice on this topic is highly appreciated. Will start with 1 server and 50TB disks on HW raid10 and add servers as data goes larger. -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.6 branch upgrade plan

Hello, Anyone please? 2016-10-03 15:42 GMT+03:00 Roman <rome...@gmail.com>: > Hello, dear community! > It was pretty much time for me not writing here, but it only means, that > everything was just fine with our gluster storage for KVM VMs. > > We are running 3.6.5 @

[Gluster-users] 3.6 branch upgrade plan

KVM hosts 2. stop glusterd on both our storages 3. upgrade both storages to jessie via apt-get dist-upgrade 4. update 3.6.5 to 3.6.9 5. start everything. Should this work or I might facing some problems? -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] samba vfs module for debian jessie?

016-04-06 16:36 GMT+03:00 Ira Cooper <i...@redhat.com>: > > > > > Roman <rome...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > does anyone know, where do I > > > > get /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/vfs/gl

Re: [Gluster-users] samba vfs module for debian jessie?

2016-04-06 16:36 GMT+03:00 Ira Cooper <i...@redhat.com>: > Roman <rome...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > does anyone know, where do I > > get /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/vfs/glusterfs.so or where do I get > it's > > source to comp

[Gluster-users] samba vfs module for debian jessie?

Hi, does anyone know, where do I get /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/vfs/glusterfs.so or where do I get it's source to compile it for debian jessie? -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs best usage / best storage type or model

No ideas? It means I should keep to my first plan? Raid6 and single volume? 2016-03-29 11:06 GMT+03:00 Roman <rome...@gmail.com>: > According to this: > http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2014-November/019443.html > it is not that easly possible. > > 2016-03-29

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs best usage / best storage type or model

According to this: http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2014-November/019443.html it is not that easly possible. 2016-03-29 0:58 GMT+03:00 Roman <rome...@gmail.com>: > and another pretty important thing - will I be able to grow this volume by > simpli adding few bricks

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs best usage / best storage type or model

and another pretty important thing - will I be able to grow this volume by simpli adding few bricks more? Or how is it going to go with expansion? 2016-03-28 14:49 GMT+03:00 Roman <rome...@gmail.com>: > have anyone had any disaster recovery actions on such setup? > For how long i

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs best usage / best storage type or model

it :) 2016-03-28 14:21 GMT+03:00 Roman <rome...@gmail.com>: > Hi Joe, > > thanks for an answer. but in the case of 37 8TB bricks the data won't be > available if one of servers fails anyway :) And it seems to me, that it > would be even bigger mess to undarstand, what files are u

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs best usage / best storage type or model

of space either way. Make 37 8TB bricks > and use disperse. > > > On March 28, 2016 10:33:52 AM GMT+02:00, Roman <rome...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for an option, but it seems that it is not that good in our >> situation. I can't waste s

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs best usage / best storage type or model

f a whole > server goes down. If you are using local RAID for redundancy and that > server goes offline you’ll be missing files. > > > > On Mar 27, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Roman <rome...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Need an advice from heavy glusterfs users and may

[Gluster-users] glusterfs 3.6.8 release notes

easier :) -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] High I/O And Processor Utilization

t this fix and the sharding ones too >> right away. >> > > > is 3.7.7 far off? > > -- > Lindsay Mathieson > > > ___ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org >

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs 3.6.8 release notes

at 01:39:52PM +0200, Roman wrote: > > Hi > > > > Seems like I've missed the mail about 3.6.8 release and notes... Could > > someone point me to the release notes e-mail? > > > > PS > > Why wouldn't devs put release notes or changelog file to repository wi

[Gluster-users] How could this happen, didn't anyone notice?

Hello! Did someone notice the year changing thing? Happy New 2016 Year, dear community and devs! Stay rocking, feel healthy (considering both glusterfs and members) and be happy. -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] VM fs becomes read only when one gluster node goes down

meout for error detection of the > disks inside the VMs, and/or decrease the network.ping-timeout. > > It would be interesting to know if adapting these values prevents the > read-only occurrences in your environment. If you do any testing with > this, please keep me informed about the results. > >

Re: [Gluster-users] VM fs becomes read only when one gluster node goes down

> > > ___ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 4.0 - upgrades & backward compatibility strategy

from the LAN > interfaces that carry the canonical host name. > > Make sure as well that file system attributes or configuration files > aren't changed during the upgrade to a point that prevents a safe > downgrade. > > Mauro > > On Thu, October 15, 2015 04:14, Atin Mukherjee

Re: [Gluster-users] Can we run VMs from Glaster volume

e can’t have live VMs? And, what if we want to > run > > sql database in the VM? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Nashid > > > > > > ___ > > Gluster-users mailing list > > Gl

Re: [Gluster-users] back to problems: gluster 3.5.4, qemu and debian 8

, 2015 at 04:06:50PM +0300, Roman wrote: Hi all, I'm back and tested those things. Michael was right. I've enabled read-ahead option and nothing changed. So the thing causes the problem with libgfapi and d8 virtio drivers is performance.write-behind. If it is off, everything works perfect

Re: [Gluster-users] back to problems: gluster 3.5.4, qemu and debian 8

(which were confirmed by other user with same configuration). 2015-07-20 1:53 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Thanks for your reply. I will test these options as soon as I'm back from ma vacation (2 weeks from now on). I'll be too far from servers to change something even on testing volume

Re: [Gluster-users] back to problems: gluster 3.5.4, qemu and debian 8

to point out that read-ahead shouldn't *break* anything for you. At the same time, if you enable it, making no other changes, and it *does* break things, that's something people would want to know about.) On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 2:42 PM Roman rome...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! Thanks for reply

Re: [Gluster-users] back to problems: gluster 3.5.4, qemu and debian 8

Roman rome...@gmail.com wrote: solved after I've added (thanks to Niels de Vos) these options to the volumes: performance.read-ahead: off performance.write-behind: off 2015-07-15 17:23 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: hey, I've updated the bug, if some1 has some ideas

Re: [Gluster-users] back to problems: gluster 3.5.4, qemu and debian 8

solved after I've added (thanks to Niels de Vos) these options to the volumes: performance.read-ahead: off performance.write-behind: off 2015-07-15 17:23 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: hey, I've updated the bug, if some1 has some ideas - share plz. https://bugzilla.redhat.com

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster write performance

But when I'm inside of VM, I'm getting 50-53 MB/s for replica and 120 MB for distributed volumes... whats the logic? that slow write speed directly to mounted gfs volume slows down backup and restore process of VMs by VE. 2015-07-18 22:47 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Hi, Looked a lot

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster write performance

changes based on it. Cordialement, Mathieu CHATEAU http://www.lotp.fr 2015-07-18 22:11 GMT+02:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: But when I'm inside of VM, I'm getting 50-53 MB/s for replica and 120 MB for distributed volumes... whats the logic? that slow write speed directly to mounted gfs volume

Re: [Gluster-users] back to problems: gluster 3.5.4, qemu and debian 8

that if you re-enabled read-ahead, you won't see the problem. Just leave write-behind off. On Sat, Jul 18, 2015, 10:44 AM Roman rome...@gmail.com wrote: solved after I've added (thanks to Niels de Vos) these options to the volumes: performance.read-ahead: off performance.write-behind: off

Re: [Gluster-users] back to problems: gluster 3.5.4, qemu and debian 8

14, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Roman rome...@gmail.com wrote: I've done this way: installed debian8 on local disks using netinstall iso, created a template of it and then cloned (full clone) it to glusterfs storage backend. VM boots and runs fine... untill I start to install something massive (DE ie

Re: [Gluster-users] back to problems: gluster 3.5.4, qemu and debian 8

here is one of the errors example. its like files that debian installer copies to the virtual disk that is located on glusterfs storage are getting corrupted. in-target is /dev/vda1 2015-07-14 11:50 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS base install and then mate install were

Re: [Gluster-users] back to problems: gluster 3.5.4, qemu and debian 8

Ubuntu 14.04 LTS base install and then mate install were fine! 2015-07-14 2:35 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Bah... the randomness of this issue is killing me. Not only HA volumes are affected. Got an error during installation of d8 with mate (on python-gtk2 pkg) on Distributed volume

Re: [Gluster-users] back to problems: gluster 3.5.4, qemu and debian 8

everything is good on the network side of things? MTU/Loss/Errors? Is your inconsistency linked to one specific brick? Have you tried running a replica instead of distributed? -- Scott H. Login, LLC. Roman rome...@gmail.com July 14, 2015 at 6:38 AM here is one of the errors example. its

Re: [Gluster-users] split-brain.. okay, what next?

problem. To solve split-brain this time, I've restored VM from backup. 2015-07-14 21:55 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Thanx for pointing out... but doesn't seem to work... or i am too sleepy due to problems with glusterfs and debian8 in other topic which i'm fighting for month.. root

[Gluster-users] unable to mount glusterfs after update to 3.6.4 from 3.5.4

'. I've got both option rpc-auth-allow-insecure on in vol file and server.allow-insecure: on per volume. HELP please It WAS production :*( -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http

Re: [Gluster-users] back to problems: gluster 3.5.4, qemu and debian 8

glusterfs 3.6.4 any ideas? I'm ready to help to investigate this bug. When sun will shine, I'll try to install latest Ubuntu also. But now I'm going to sleep. 2015-07-14 0:54 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: So, just to conclude this: upgraded to 3.6.4 problem still exists and is only with D8

Re: [Gluster-users] back to problems: gluster 3.5.4, qemu and debian 8

Other way - some Dev should instruct me, what logs one needs and how do I get them. I do not want to switch to ceph the whole production setup, but this bug is just annoying. 2015-07-14 0:54 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: So, just to conclude this: upgraded to 3.6.4 problem still exists

Re: [Gluster-users] back to problems: gluster 3.5.4, qemu and debian 8

So, just to conclude this: upgraded to 3.6.4 problem still exists and is only with D8 and gluster HA volumes. Someone from devs really should test it. 2015-07-13 19:59 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Hi, I've reported a lot about this, but every time there was something that made me

Re: [Gluster-users] troubles installing Debian8 as qemu-kvm guest on glusterfs 3.5.4 HA storage volume, need help please!

Hi, Why do you guys ignore this? If you do not want to setup proxmox with gluster, let me help you to debug this.. I'm so far now, that can say, its only up to replicated volumes... 2015-06-17 12:51 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Hi, guys, have you tried to play with this? product can't

Re: [Gluster-users] troubles installing Debian8 as qemu-kvm guest on glusterfs 3.5.4 HA storage volume, need help please!

:08 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Hi, Why do you guys ignore this? If you do not want to setup proxmox with gluster, let me help you to debug this.. I'm so far now, that can say, its only up to replicated volumes... 2015-06-17 12:51 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Hi, guys, have

Re: [Gluster-users] troubles installing Debian8 as qemu-kvm guest on glusterfs 3.5.4 HA storage volume, need help please!

Hi, guys, have you tried to play with this? product can't be named stable, if significant part of it (HA) does not run properly ... 2015-06-15 9:50 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: any ideas? 2015-06-12 0:53 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Ah so many information to share and I forgot

Re: [Gluster-users] troubles installing Debian8 as qemu-kvm guest on glusterfs 3.5.4 HA storage volume, need help please!

any ideas? 2015-06-12 0:53 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Ah so many information to share and I forgot one more thing: if I create the VM on Distributed volume and then convert it to template and clone it to HA volume, things seem to be working fine also. So there is something wrong

[Gluster-users] upgrade

to upgrade to one of them from 3.5.3 ? -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Gluster-users] troubles installing Debian8 as qemu-kvm guest on glusterfs 3.5.4 HA storage volume, need help please!

Bricks: Brick1: stor1:/exports/S14A4F-D/2TB Brick2: stor2:/exports/S14A4F-D/2TB Options Reconfigured: network.ping-timeout: 3 server.allow-insecure: on If I install on local storage everything works fine also. -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] troubles installing Debian8 as qemu-kvm guest on glusterfs 3.5.4 HA storage volume, need help please!

of my proxmox hosts - no losses and they are connected over 1gbps network. Storage network for gluster uses separate network with 1 gbps cards also. 2015-06-12 0:38 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Hi, The debian 8.1 is released, but I've got still problems installing it as qemu-kvm guest

[Gluster-users] gluster 3.7

Hi Will there be version for wheezy also? -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Gluster-users] Debian Jessie (8) qemu-kvm VM and glusterfs as backend storage

problems. installing deb7 on the same setup (same VM even, just another virtual driver) is ok. -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] Debian Jessie (8) qemu-kvm VM and glusterfs as backend storage

Actually its pretty random. Now got installed without any problems using 3.5.3 . don't know what to do. and its only with Debian 8. 2015-05-15 18:53 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Hey, Seems like the problem exists. I've got 4 instances of proxmox. I've started to update glusterfs some

Re: [Gluster-users] Debian Jessie (8) qemu-kvm VM and glusterfs as backend storage

... we are running this on in production. 2015-05-15 16:18 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Hi, Are there any issues with debian8 and glusterfs? Got this setup: 1. promox 3.4 2. gluster 3.5.3 both server and client (I use gluster repo on proxmox server) 3. HA gluster volume What I'm

Re: [Gluster-users] Debian Jessie (8) qemu-kvm VM and glusterfs as backend storage

for your idea. 2015-05-15 19:35 GMT+03:00 Joe Julian j...@julianfamily.org: It sounds like a network problem to me. Verify with iperf between your client and each server. On 05/15/2015 09:01 AM, Roman wrote: Actually its pretty random. Now got installed without any problems using 3.5.3

Re: [Gluster-users] Problmes with GlusterFS 3.6.2 Proxmox 3.3 using OpenVZ containers

options values of a volume? Thanks in advance. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS and iScsi target export

@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] iscsi and distributed volume

Well, I meant stripe volume :) As file size should exceed brick's size. And questions remain the same. Hope for a quick response. 2015-04-01 11:38 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Hi devs, list! I've got somewhat simple but in same time pretty difficult question. But I'm running glusterf

[Gluster-users] iscsi and distributed volume

failure due to network or power) yes, we have backup server and ups and generator, as we are running DC, but I'm just curious if we will have to restore the data from backups or it will be available after brick comes back up? -- Best regards, Roman

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Got a slogan idea?

___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman

Re: [Gluster-users] expanding distributed and replicated volume size. pretty urgent.

Thanks for reply! 2015-03-30 6:40 GMT+03:00 Kaushal M kshlms...@gmail.com: Hi Roman, The steps you've given should work without any problems. And the same steps will apply for a replicated volume as well. ~kaushal On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Roman rome...@gmail.com wrote: anyone

Re: [Gluster-users] loging bug?

Anyone? 2015-03-13 10:42 GMT+02:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Hi, Running glusterfs 3.5.3 built on Nov 17 2014 15:48:54 on two servers and one client. And all have same issue: they are loging to the wrong place. They should log to: /var/log/glusterfs/cli.log /var/log/glusterfs/nfs.log

Re: [Gluster-users] expanding distributed and replicated volume size. pretty urgent.

anyone? 2015-03-13 15:48 GMT+02:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Hi, This is the question to the whole community and for devs too. So feel free to answer, if you have some experience with this. I've found a lot of information about expanding volumes by adding another volume on another server

[Gluster-users] loging bug?

rotate 7 delaycompress compress notifempty missingok postrotate [ ! -f /var/run/glusterd.pid ] || kill -HUP `cat /var/run/glusterd.pid` endscript } -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster

[Gluster-users] expanding distributed and replicated volume size. pretty urgent.

distributed volume again. Will it work? Works the same way with replicated volume? -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Gluster-users] healing never ends (or never starts?) on replicated volume with virtual block device

] 0-HA-WIN-TT-1T-replicate-0: Another crawl is in progress for HA-WIN-TT-1T-client-0 same on stor2 -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] healing never ends (or never starts?) on replicated volume with virtual block device

oh, never mind. it is synced now. took a LOT of time :) 2014-11-06 13:12 GMT+02:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Hi, another stupid/interesting situation: root@stor1:~# gluster volume heal HA-WIN-TT-1T info Brick stor1:/exports/NFS-WIN/1T/ /disk - Possibly undergoing heal Number of entries

Re: [Gluster-users] healing never ends (or never starts?) on replicated volume with virtual block device

, metadata - Pending matrix: [ [ 0 0 ] [ 3 0 ] ], on gfid:c7b624e4-1c66-4de7-aa89-95460ff098aa ehm, just found this. what could it mean? any way to gfid to file transformation? 2014-11-06 14:40 GMT+02:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: oh, never mind. it is synced now. took a LOT of time :) 2014-11-06

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs under high load failing?

Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com: On 10/14/2014 01:20 AM, Roman wrote: ok. done. this time there were no disconnects, at least all of vms are working, but got some mails from VM about IO writes again. WARNINGs: Read IO Wait time is 1.45 (outside range [0:1]). This warning says

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs under high load failing?

, distributed file system scaling to several petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman

[Gluster-users] glusterfs under high load failing?

of 900GB), healing process goes soo slow :) -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs under high load failing?

:/exports/NFS-WIN/1T Options Reconfigured: nfs.disable: 1 network.ping-timeout: 10 2014-10-13 19:09 GMT+03:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com: Could you give your 'gluster volume info' output? Pranith On 10/13/2014 09:36 PM, Roman wrote: Hi, I've got this kind of setup

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs under high load failing?

Sure. I'll let it to run for this night . 2014-10-13 19:19 GMT+03:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com: hi Roman, Do you think we can run this test again? this time, could you enable 'gluster volume profile volname start', do the same test. Provide output of 'gluster volume

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs under high load failing?

stor1:HA-WIN-TT-1T 1008G 901G 57G 95% /srv/nfs/HA-WIN-TT-1T no file, but size is still 901G. Both servers show the same. Do I really have to restart the volume to fix that? 2014-10-13 19:30 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Sure. I'll let it to run

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs under high load failing?

Still the same way: just created a large empty file: dd if=/dev/zero of=disk bs=1G count=900 iflag=fullblock 2014-10-13 19:49 GMT+03:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com: On 10/13/2014 10:03 PM, Roman wrote: hmm, seems like another strange issue? Seen this before. Had to restart

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs under high load failing?

oh sorry, and then deleted it, of course :) 2014-10-13 19:53 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: Still the same way: just created a large empty file: dd if=/dev/zero of=disk bs=1G count=900 iflag=fullblock 2014-10-13 19:49 GMT+03:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com: On 10/13

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs under high load failing?

,max_read=131072 0 0 2014-10-13 19:56 GMT+03:00 Joe Julian j...@julianfamily.org: Looks like you're mounting NFS? That would be the FSCache in the client. On 10/13/2014 09:33 AM, Roman wrote: hmm, seems like another strange issue? Seen this before. Had to restart the volume to get my

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs under high load failing?

So may I restart the volume and start the test, or you need something else from this issue? 2014-10-13 19:49 GMT+03:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com: On 10/13/2014 10:03 PM, Roman wrote: hmm, seems like another strange issue? Seen this before. Had to restart the volume to get

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs under high load failing?

i think i may know what was an issue. There was an iscsitarget service runing, that was exporting this generated block device. so maybe my collegue Windows server picked it up and mountd :) I'll if it will happen again. 2014-10-13 20:27 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: So may I restart

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs under high load failing?

1313096.68 us 125.00 us 23281862.00 us189 FSYNC 92.18 397.92 us 76.00 us 1838343.00 us7372799 WRITE Duration: 7811 seconds Data Read: 0 bytes Data Written: 966367641600 bytes does it make something more clear? 2014-10-13 20:40 GMT+03:00 Roman rome

Re: [Gluster-users] To GlusterFS or not...

/listinfo/gluster-users -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] To GlusterFS or not...

are exploring raid controllers with onboard SSD cache which may help. On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Roman rome...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, just a question ... Would SAS disks be better in situation with lots of seek times using GlusterFS? 2014-09-22 23:03 GMT+03:00 Jeff Darcy jda

[Gluster-users] INFO: task #### blocked for more than 120 seconds.

Hi This morning we had a VM crash and these logs (see attc) No logs on gluster servers nor virtual host where this is glusterfs mount is attached. Any ideas? -- Best regards, Roman. Sep 16 06:36:58 munin kernel: [1025760.825197] jbd2/vda1-8 D 88003fc93780 0 179 2

Re: [Gluster-users] libgfapi failover problem on replica bricks

No news on this? 2014-09-03 10:05 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com: well, yeah. it continues to write to the log.1 file after rotation root@stor1:~# ls -lo /proc/9162/fd/ total 0 lr-x-- 1 root 64 Sep 2 11:23 0 - /dev/null l-wx-- 1 root 64 Sep 2 11:23 1 - /dev/null lrwx-- 1

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs replica volume self heal dir very slow！！why？

/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] new packages for debian in repository

: Wait until the heal queue is empty, ie. gluster volume heal $volname info On September 3, 2014 7:28:06 AM PDT, Roman rome...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks! So it is pretty safe to upgrade. And by the way, if we speak about updgrades... is it safe to upgrade on servers? I mean, does restarting

Re: [Gluster-users] libgfapi failover problem on replica bricks

May be I have to add the HUP command for /var/lib/glusterd/glustershd/run/glustershd.pid in the logrotate.d config file? ATM it has only this postrotate [ ! -f /var/run/glusterd.pid ] || kill -HUP `cat /var/run/glusterd.pid` 2014-09-03 10:05 GMT+03:00 Roman rome

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Regarding the write performance in replica 1 volume in 1Gbps Ethernet, get about 50MB/s while writing single file.

regards, Jaden Liang 9/2/2014 -- Best regards, Jaden Liang ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -- Best regards, Roman

Re: [Gluster-users] libgfapi failover problem on replica bricks

-- 1 root 64 Sep 2 11:23 6 - socket:[1473128] lrwx-- 1 root 64 Sep 2 11:23 7 - socket:[1472592] l-wx-- 1 root 64 Sep 2 11:23 8 - /var/log/glusterfs/.cmd_log_history lrwx-- 1 root 64 Sep 2 11:23 9 - socket:[1419368] root@stor1:~# 2014-09-02 18:01 GMT+03:00 Roman rome...@gmail.com

Re: [Gluster-users] Disbalanced load

mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Gluster-users] new packages for debian in repository

Hi I see new packages available in distro. Before I upgrade, where can one read changelog? Why new and what have been done? -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman

Re: [Gluster-users] new packages for debian in repository

. KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com: Roman wrote: I see new packages available in distro. Before I upgrade, where can one read changelog? Why new and what have been done? I'm not an apt/dpkg expert but it seems like you shoudl be able to do an `apt-listchanges ...` on one of the .deb files to see its

Re: [Gluster-users] new packages for debian in repository

Thanks. Thought so. Last time had a small issue after upgrade. 2014-09-03 17:45 GMT+03:00 Joe Julian j...@julianfamily.org: Wait until the heal queue is empty, ie. gluster volume heal $volname info On September 3, 2014 7:28:06 AM PDT, Roman rome...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks! So

Re: [Gluster-users] new packages for debian in repository

Sure It does! thanks. I was looking for them at glusterfs homepage :) 2014-09-04 8:22 GMT+03:00 Justin Clift jus...@gluster.org: On 03/09/2014, at 2:38 PM, Roman wrote: snip I see new packages available in distro. Before I upgrade, where can one read changelog? Why new and what have been

Re: [Gluster-users] complete f......p thanks to glusterfs...applause, you crashed weeks of work

@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -- Best regards, Roman. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] libgfapi failover problem on replica bricks

, and it doesn't have anywhere to log that I know of. That being said, glusterfs has always recovered nicely whenever I have lost and recovered a server, but the healing seems to need an hour or so based on cpu and network usage graphs On 9/1/2014 9:26 AM, Roman wrote: Hmm, I don't know how

Re: [Gluster-users] libgfapi failover problem on replica bricks

etc? Pranith On 08/28/2014 11:27 PM, Roman wrote: Here are the results. 1. still have problem with logs rotation. logs are being written to .log.1 file, not .log file. any hints, how to fix? 2. healing logs are now much more better, I can see the successful message. 3. both volumes with HD

  1   2   >