I apologize for the wrong mail. This .t failed only for one patch and I
don't think it is spurious. Closing this bug as not a bug.
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:04 PM Sanju Rakonde wrote:
> I see a lot of patches are failing regressions due to the .t mentioned in
> the subject line. I've filed a
I see a lot of patches are failing regressions due to the .t mentioned in
the subject line. I've filed a bug[1] for the same.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713284
--
Thanks,
Sanju
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org