Hi Philip,
Did you try installing libssl from source to meet the dependency?
-sac
Sent from my iPhone
On 02-Jun-2012, at 13:57, Philip flip...@googlemail.com wrote:
It is still not possible to install the 3.3 deb on a stable release of debian
because squeeze has no libssl1.0.0.
Doesn't sound like the solution we need for a large cluster. We would like
to keep it simple and stupid. Squeeze has libssl version 0.9.8. Maybe you
can work with Toby Corkindale since he managed to create a deb for sq
ueeze?
2012/6/2 John Mark Walker johnm...@redhat.com
Philip -
Gluster.org
- Original Message -
Doesn't sound like the solution we need for a large cluster. We would
like to keep it simple and stupid . Squeeze has libssl version
0.9.8. Maybe you can work with Toby Corkindale since he managed
to create a deb for sq ueeze?
I hear what you're saying. I expect
It is still not possible to install the 3.3 deb on a stable release of
debian because squeeze has no libssl1.0.0.
2012/5/31 John Mark Walker johnm...@redhat.com
Today, we’re announcing the next generation of
GlusterFShttp://www.gluster.org/,
version 3.3. The release has been a year in the
I haven't but I will give it a try! Maybe you should also reconsider the
way you are building the debs. Building debs for a stable software on/for a
unstable operating system isn't smart is it?
2012/6/2 Sachidananda URS s...@redhat.com
Hi Philip,
Did you try installing libssl from source to
Installing libssl1.0.0 from source does not help, I am still getting the
same error message. Come on Gluster/Redhat, its kind of ridiculous if you
only support a unstable operating system for your stable release.
2012/6/2 Philip flip...@googlemail.com
I haven't but I will give it a try! Maybe
Philip -
Gluster.org is only nominally a Red Hat operation. If you want better Debian
support, you need to help us do it. Also, it's common for legacy distributions
not to have support for brand new releases. You can expect Squeeze to support
3.2.x, but not necessarily 3.3.x. I agree that this
- Original Message -
Installing libssl1.0.0 from source does not help, I am still getting
the same error message. Come on Gluster/Redhat, its kind of
ridiculous if you only support a unstable operating system for your
stable release.
Hi Philip - I just realized that the released
] A very special announcement from Gluster.org
It is still not possible to install the 3.3 deb on a stable release of debian
because squeeze has no libssl1.0.0.
2012/5/31 John Mark Walker johnm...@redhat.com
Today, we’re announcing the next generation of GlusterFS , version 3.3
This post mentions that you should skip step 5 if installed using RPM.
Is this also true for the debian/ubuntu packages? The debian packages
appear a lot smaller than the ubuntu ones, is this expected?
I shall test the upgrade path on debian in a test environment, so I
suppose I will find out
Congratulations on the release of 3.3.0!
Very exciting times in the world of gluster right now.
I'm looking to upgrade from 3.2.6 to 3.3.0 on a RHEL5.8 system.
I notice only RHEL6 RPM's are currently being made available.
Apologies if this has already been covered elsewhere:
Will RHEL5
I experienced the following going from both 3.2.5 and 3.2.6 (using
'official' gluster packages) on RHEL6.
[root@rhesproddns02 ~]# rpm -Uvh glusterfs-*3.3.0*
Preparing...###
[100%]
1:glusterfs
On 06/01/2012 08:00 AM, David Coulson wrote:
I experienced the following going from both 3.2.5 and 3.2.6 (using
'official' gluster packages) on RHEL6.
If by 'official' gluster packages you mean the glusterfs rpms in the
fedora/epel yum repo, and your 3.2.5 was built from source or using
I had the same thing happen to me on RHEL6 with /var being it's own
mount point. All I had to do was copy /etc/glusterd to /var/lib/ as you
did, run the remaining part of the RPM's script by hand, then rename my
vol files back in place.
To get the RPM script: rpm -q --scripts
No build for Ubuntu 12.04 yet? :-(
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
On 6/1/12 8:14 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
If by 'official' gluster packages you mean the glusterfs rpms in the
fedora/epel yum repo, and your 3.2.5 was built from source or using
rpms from somewhere else, including e.g. gluster.org, then your
experience is not unexpected.
I used the
Today, we’re announcing the next generation of GlusterFS , version 3.3. The
release has been a year in the making and marks several firsts: the first
post-acquisition release under Red Hat, our first major act as an
openly-governed project and our first foray beyond NAS. We’ve also taken our
Is there a migration guide from 3.2.5 to 3.3 available?
On 5/31/12 12:33 PM, John Mark Walker wrote:
Today, we're announcing the next generation of GlusterFS
http://www.gluster.org/, version 3.3. The release has been a year in
the making and marks several firsts: the first post-acquisition
See this post -
http://vbellur.wordpress.com/2012/05/31/upgrading-to-glusterfs-3-3/
Will publish that on gluster.org very soon.
-JM
- Original Message -
Is there a migration guide from 3.2.5 to 3.3 available?
On 5/31/12 12:33 PM, John Mark Walker wrote:
Today, we’re announcing
WooHooo! Thanks, Glusteristas! Timing is quite fortuitous for us.
hjm
On 05/31/2012 09:33 AM, John Mark Walker wrote:
Today, we're announcing the next generation of GlusterFS
http://www.gluster.org/, version 3.3. The release has been a year in
the making and marks several firsts: the first
20 matches
Mail list logo
