Re: [Gluster-users] NFS replacement

2009-09-02 Thread Stephan von Krawczynski
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:33:38 +0530 Shehjar Tikoo shehj...@gluster.com wrote: Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:48:46 +0530 Shehjar Tikoo shehj...@gluster.com wrote: Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: Hello all, after playing around for some weeks we decided to

[Gluster-users] NFS replacement

2009-08-31 Thread Stephan von Krawczynski
Hello all, after playing around for some weeks we decided to make some real world tests with glusterfs. Therefore we took a nfs-client and mounted the very same data with glusterfs. The client does some logfile processing every 5 minutes and needs around 3,5 mins runtime in a nfs setup. We found

Re: [Gluster-users] NFS replacement

2009-08-31 Thread Shehjar Tikoo
Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: Hello all, after playing around for some weeks we decided to make some real world tests with glusterfs. Therefore we took a nfs-client and mounted the very same data with glusterfs. The client does some logfile processing every 5 minutes and needs around 3,5 mins

Re: [Gluster-users] NFS replacement

2009-08-31 Thread Stephan von Krawczynski
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:48:46 +0530 Shehjar Tikoo shehj...@gluster.com wrote: Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: Hello all, after playing around for some weeks we decided to make some real world tests with glusterfs. Therefore we took a nfs-client and mounted the very same data with

Re: [Gluster-users] NFS replacement, rest stopped

2009-08-31 Thread Stephan von Krawczynski
Hello all, as told earlier we tried to replace a nfs-server/client combination in semi-production environment with a trivial one-server gluster setup. We thought at first that this pretty simple setup would allow some more testing. Unfortunately we have to stop those tests because it turns out