Re: [Gluster-users] Need help to design a data storage

2016-09-01 Thread Xavier Hernandez
Hi, On 09/08/16 20:43, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: Il 09 ago 2016 19:57, "Ashish Pandey" > ha scritto: Yes, redundant data spread across multiple servers. In my example I mentioned 6 different nodes each with one brick. Point is that for 4+2

Re: [Gluster-users] Need help to design a data storage

2016-08-09 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
Il 09 ago 2016 19:57, "Ashish Pandey" ha scritto: > Yes, redundant data spread across multiple servers. In my example I mentioned 6 different nodes each with one brick. > Point is that for 4+2 you can loose any 2 bricks. It could be because of node failure or brick failure. >

Re: [Gluster-users] Need help to design a data storage

2016-08-09 Thread Ashish Pandey
...@gmail.com> To: "Ashish Pandey" <aspan...@redhat.com> Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 11:08:12 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Need help to design a data storage Il 09 ago 2016 19:20, "Ashish Pandey" < aspan...@redhat.com > ha

Re: [Gluster-users] Need help to design a data storage

2016-08-09 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
Il 09 ago 2016 19:20, "Ashish Pandey" ha scritto: > 3 - EC with redundancy 2 that is 4+2 > The over all storage space you get is 4TB and any 2 bricks can be down at any point of time. So it is as good as replica 3 but providing more space. Not really. With replica 3 i can

Re: [Gluster-users] Need help to design a data storage

2016-08-09 Thread Ashish Pandey
- Original Message - From: "Gandalf Corvotempesta" <gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> To: "Ashish Pandey" <aspan...@redhat.com> Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 8:33:31 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Need help to design a data storage

Re: [Gluster-users] Need help to design a data storage

2016-08-09 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
Il 09 ago 2016 10:06 AM, "Ashish Pandey" ha scritto: > If your main concern is data redundancy, I would suggest you to go for erasure coded volume provided by gluster. Anyway EC volumes has a lower redundancy level than standard replicated volumes. Let's assume a 9 nodes

Re: [Gluster-users] Need help to design a data storage

2016-08-09 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
Il 09 ago 2016 10:06 AM, "Ashish Pandey" ha scritto: > If your main concern is data redundancy, I would suggest you to go for erasure coded volume provided by gluster. > Erasure coded (EC) volume or disperse volume can provide you redundancy without wasting too much storage.

[Gluster-users] Need help to design a data storage

2016-08-08 Thread Sham Arsiwala
HI, I want to store data which is 135TB, and main requirement is data redundancy, i can scarify of data performance, but data should not be lost. ​can you help me in a design​ -- -- Regards.: SHAM P. ARSIWALA. RHC{E-A-I} M.: 9099099855 ___