Re: [Gluster-users] No performance difference using libgfapi?

2014-04-04 Thread Humble Devassy Chirammal
Hi David, Regarding hdparm: 'hdparm' has to be used against SATA/IDE device. --snip-- hdparm - get/set SATA/IDE device parameters hdparm provides a command line interface to various kernel interfaces supported by the Linux SATA/PATA/SAS libata subsystem and the older IDE

Re: [Gluster-users] No performance difference using libgfapi?

2014-04-04 Thread Dan Lambright
Christianson davidchristians...@gmail.com Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org Sent: Friday, April 4, 2014 3:05:20 AM Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] No performance difference using libgfapi? Hi David, Regarding hdparm: 'hdparm' has to be used against SATA/IDE device. --snip-- hdparm - get/set SATA/IDE

[Gluster-users] No performance difference using libgfapi?

2014-04-03 Thread Dave Christianson
Good Morning, In my earlier experience invoking a VM using qemu/libgfapi, I reported that it was noticeably faster than the same VM invoked from libvirt using a FUSE mount; however, this was erroneous as the qemu/libgfapi-invoked image was created using 2x the RAM and cpu's... So, invoking the

Re: [Gluster-users] No performance difference using libgfapi?

2014-04-03 Thread Josh Boon
things. - Original Message - From: Dave Christianson davidchristians...@gmail.com To: gluster-users@gluster.org Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 6:05:51 AM Subject: [Gluster-users] No performance difference using libgfapi? Good Morning, In my earlier experience invoking a VM using qemu

Re: [Gluster-users] No performance difference using libgfapi?

2014-04-03 Thread Carlos Capriotti
*To: *gluster-users@gluster.org *Sent: *Thursday, April 3, 2014 6:05:51 AM *Subject: *[Gluster-users] No performance difference using libgfapi? Good Morning, In my earlier experience invoking a VM using qemu/libgfapi, I reported that it was noticeably faster than the same VM invoked from libvirt