Hi everyone. I have a question about performance, hoping that perhaps
someone has already tested these scenarios so that I don't have to.
In order to maximize a Gluster array's performance, which is faster:
Gluster servers with 6 SAS disks each set up in a RAID0 configuration,
letting Gluster
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:06:05PM +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
What was interesting is that pure-linux-nfs from
node2 to node1 had roughly the same results as glusterfs on node2 to a single-
brick volume on node1...
Yes, that's what I was hoping you'd see. There's nothing inherently
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:37:10AM +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
1) two nodes, two bricks, 2) two nodes, four bricks and 3) three
nodes, 6bricks.
Are these distributed only, or replicated?
If I understand it right (and I'm quite new to gluster myself), whenever you
do a read on a replicated
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 03:07:53PM +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
If I understand it right (and I'm quite new to gluster myself), whenever you
do a read on a replicated volume, gluster dispatches the operation to both
nodes, waits for both results to come back, and checks they are the same
-users-boun...@gluster.org
[mailto:gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] On Behalf Of Brian Candler
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 8:13 AM
To: Arnold Krille
Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Performance question
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 03:07:53PM +0100, Arnold Krille wrote
I'm using an unpatched fuse 2.7.4-1 and glusterfs 2.0.2-1 with the
following configs and have this result which surprised me:
# dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=512k count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 14.1538 seconds, 37.9 MB/s
# dd if=/dev/zero of=foo
Joe Julian wrote:
I'm using an unpatched fuse 2.7.4-1 and glusterfs 2.0.2-1 with the
following configs and have this result which surprised me:
# dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=512k count=1024 1024+0 records in 1024+0
records out 536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 14.1538 seconds, 37.9
MB/s # dd
I'm using an unpatched fuse 2.7.4-1 and glusterfs 2.0.2-1 with the
following configs and have this result which surprised me:
# dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=512k count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 14.1538 seconds, 37.9 MB/s
# dd if=/dev/zero of=foo
